106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18458592)
1. Intraoperative 3-dimensional reconstructed multiplanar fluoroscopic imaging for immediate evaluation of spinal decompression.
Patel VV; Dwyer A; Estes S; Burger E
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 May; 21(3):209-12. PubMed ID: 18458592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Intraoperative three-dimensional imaging to monitor selective decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis].
Mauer UM; Kunz U
Orthopade; 2006 Dec; 35(12):1258-60. PubMed ID: 17089144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Lumbar spinal canal dimensions measured intraoperatively after decompression are not properly rendered on early postoperative MRI.
Schenck C; van Susante J; van Gorp M; Belder R; Vleggeert-Lankamp C
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2016 May; 158(5):981-8. PubMed ID: 27005673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison between MRI and myelography in lumbar spinal canal stenosis for the decision of levels of decompression surgery.
Morita M; Miyauchi A; Okuda S; Oda T; Iwasaki M
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Feb; 24(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 20625326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Epidural fentanyl for postoperative analgesia after lumbar canal decompression: a randomized controlled trial.
Guilfoyle MR; Mannion RJ; Mitchell P; Thomson S
Spine J; 2012 Aug; 12(8):646-51. PubMed ID: 22926408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Outcome after less-invasive decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized comparison of unilateral laminotomy, bilateral laminotomy, and laminectomy.
Thomé C; Zevgaridis D; Leheta O; Bäzner H; Pöckler-Schöniger C; Wöhrle J; Schmiedek P
J Neurosurg Spine; 2005 Aug; 3(2):129-41. PubMed ID: 16370302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intraoperative spinal navigation.
Holly LT; Foley KT
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Aug; 28(15 Suppl):S54-61. PubMed ID: 12897475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intraoperative myelography in minimally invasive decompression for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.
Pao JL; Wang JL
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Jul; 25(5):E117-24. PubMed ID: 22739384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The significance of residual stenosis after decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis.
Jalovaara P; Lähde S; Iikko E; Niinimäki T; Puranen J; Lindholm RV
Ann Chir Gynaecol; 1989; 78(4):304-8. PubMed ID: 2624404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Distraction laminoplasty for decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis.
O'Leary PF; McCance SE
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2001 Mar; (384):26-34. PubMed ID: 11249174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Complications associated with minimally invasive decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis.
Podichetty VK; Spears J; Isaacs RE; Booher J; Biscup RS
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2006 May; 19(3):161-6. PubMed ID: 16770211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Myelography using flat panel volumetric computed tomography: a comparative study in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
Engelhorn T; Rennert J; Richter G; Struffert T; Ganslandt O; Doerfler A
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Aug; 32(18):E523-7. PubMed ID: 17700433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Chimney sublaminar decompression for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.
Lin SM; Tseng SH; Yang JC; Tu CC
J Neurosurg Spine; 2006 May; 4(5):359-64. PubMed ID: 16703902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of sagittal spinopelvic alignment on clinical outcomes after decompression surgery for lumbar spinal canal stenosis without coronal imbalance.
Hikata T; Watanabe K; Fujita N; Iwanami A; Hosogane N; Ishii K; Nakamura M; Toyama Y; Matsumoto M
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Oct; 23(4):451-8. PubMed ID: 26140404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Usefulness of Posner's definition of spinal instability for selection of surgical treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis.
Yone K; Sakou T
J Spinal Disord; 1999 Feb; 12(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 10078948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The value of intraoperative three dimensional fluoroscopy in anterior decompressive surgery of the cervical spine.
Baldauf J; Müller JU; Fleck S; Hinz P; Chiriac A; Schroeder HW
Zentralbl Neurochir; 2008 Feb; 69(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 18393162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Anamnesis and myelography in the preoperative assessment of lumbar spinal stenosis. Results of a postoperative follow-up study].
Jeanneret B; Forster T
Orthopade; 1993 Aug; 22(4):227-31. PubMed ID: 8414479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of indirect decompression of the lumbar spinal canal following minimally invasive lateral transpsoas interbody fusion: radiographic and outcome analysis.
Elowitz EH; Yanni DS; Chwajol M; Starke RM; Perin NI
Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2011 Oct; 54(5-6):201-6. PubMed ID: 22278781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Unilateral approach for bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: a minimal invasive surgery.
Usman M; Ali M; Khanzada K; Ishaq M; Naeem-ul-Haq ; Aman R; Ali M
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2013 Dec; 23(12):852-6. PubMed ID: 24304987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Modified Marmot operation versus spinous process transverse cutting laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis.
Kawakami M; Nakao S; Fukui D; Kadosaka Y; Matsuoka T; Yamada H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Nov; 38(23):E1461-8. PubMed ID: 23778375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
