These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18459263)

  • 1. Selection in touch: negative priming with tactile stimuli.
    Frings C; Bader R; Spence C
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Apr; 70(3):516-23. PubMed ID: 18459263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Identity-Based Crossmodal Negative Priming: Aftereffects of Ignoring in One Sensory Modality on Responding to Another Sensory Modality.
    Wesslein AK; Frings C
    Multisens Res; 2020 Aug; 33(7):703-721. PubMed ID: 32101789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Remember the touch: tactile distractors retrieve previous responses to targets.
    Moeller B; Frings C
    Exp Brain Res; 2011 Sep; 214(1):121-30. PubMed ID: 21822951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Vision of a pictorial hand modulates visual-tactile interactions.
    Igarashi Y; Kitagawa N; Ichihara S
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2004 Jun; 4(2):182-92. PubMed ID: 15460924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spatial constraints on visual-tactile cross-modal distractor congruency effects.
    Spence C; Pavani F; Driver J
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2004 Jun; 4(2):148-69. PubMed ID: 15460922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. When vision influences the invisible distractor: tactile response compatibility effects require vision.
    Wesslein AK; Spence C; Frings C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Apr; 40(2):763-74. PubMed ID: 24245501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spatial negative priming: In touch, it's all about location.
    Wesslein AK; Spence C; Mast F; Frings C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Feb; 78(2):464-73. PubMed ID: 26590049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Separating after-effects of target and distractor processing in the tactile sensory modality.
    Wesslein AK; Moeller B; Frings C; Giesen C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Apr; 81(3):809-822. PubMed ID: 30628034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. When seeing doesn't matter: assessing the after-effects of tactile distractor processing in the blind and the sighted.
    Frings C; Amendt A; Spence C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Aug; 37(4):1174-81. PubMed ID: 21553991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tactile spatial negative priming occurs without feature mismatch.
    Frings C; Mast F; Spence C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Nov; 76(8):2305-14. PubMed ID: 24944106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Gating at early cortical processing stages is associated with changes in behavioural performance on a sensory conflict task.
    Adams MS; Popovich C; Staines WR
    Behav Brain Res; 2017 Jan; 317():179-187. PubMed ID: 27641325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. You can't ignore what you can't separate: the effect of visually induced target-distractor separation on tactile selection.
    Wesslein AK; Spence C; Frings C
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Jun; 22(3):728-36. PubMed ID: 25316048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cognitive-behavioral and electrophysiological evidence of the affective consequences of ignoring stimulus representations in working memory.
    De Vito D; Ferrey AE; Fenske MJ; Al-Aidroos N
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2018 Jun; 18(3):460-475. PubMed ID: 29546688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On the fate of distractor representations.
    Frings C; Wentura D; Wühr P
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Jun; 38(3):570-5. PubMed ID: 22428679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The redundant target effect is affected by modality switch costs.
    Gondan M; Lange K; Rösler F; Röder B
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2004 Apr; 11(2):307-13. PubMed ID: 15260198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. When visual distractors predict tactile search: The temporal profile of cross-modal spatial learning.
    Chen S; Shi Z; Müller HJ; Geyer T
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Sep; 47(9):1453-1470. PubMed ID: 33464111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Expected but omitted stimuli affect crossmodal interaction.
    Costantini M; Migliorati D; Donno B; Sirota M; Ferri F
    Cognition; 2018 Feb; 171():52-64. PubMed ID: 29107888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual capture of touch: out-of-the-body experiences with rubber gloves.
    Pavani F; Spence C; Driver J
    Psychol Sci; 2000 Sep; 11(5):353-9. PubMed ID: 11228904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Space-independent modality-driven attentional capture in auditory, tactile and visual systems.
    Turatto M; Galfano G; Bridgeman B; Umiltà C
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Apr; 155(3):301-10. PubMed ID: 14658019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Everything is worth when it is close to my body: How spatial proximity and stimulus valence affect visuo-tactile integration.
    Spaccasassi C; Romano D; Maravita A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jan; 192():42-51. PubMed ID: 30412839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.