These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18459349)

  • 1. Nonequilibrium coexistence in a competition model with nutrient storage.
    Revilla T; Weissing FJ
    Ecology; 2008 Mar; 89(3):865-77. PubMed ID: 18459349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Seed-cache exchange promotes coexistence and coupled consumer oscillations: a model of desert rodents as resource processors.
    Price MV; Mittler JE
    J Theor Biol; 2003 Jul; 223(2):215-31. PubMed ID: 12814604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Coexistence and limiting similarity of consumer species competing for a linear array of resources.
    Abrams PA; Rueffler C
    Ecology; 2009 Mar; 90(3):812-22. PubMed ID: 19341150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A periodic Droop model for two species competition in a chemostat.
    White MC; Zhao XQ
    Bull Math Biol; 2009 Jan; 71(1):145-61. PubMed ID: 18825462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bacterial competition in activated sludge: theoretical analysis of varying solids retention times on diversity.
    Saikaly PE; Oerther DB
    Microb Ecol; 2004 Aug; 48(2):274-84. PubMed ID: 15116279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Competition and allelopathy with resource storage: two resources.
    Grover JP; Wang FB
    J Theor Biol; 2014 Jun; 351():9-24. PubMed ID: 24560723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stoichiometrically explicit competition between grazers: species replacement, coexistence, and priority effects along resource supply gradients.
    Hall SR
    Am Nat; 2004 Aug; 164(2):157-72. PubMed ID: 15278841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Competitive mechanism of non - predator - prey metapopulation system based on competition and dispersal ability].
    Liang R; Lin Z
    Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2006 Jun; 17(6):987-91. PubMed ID: 16964928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Trade-offs, temporal variation, and species coexistence in communities with intraguild predation.
    Amarasekare P
    Ecology; 2007 Nov; 88(11):2720-8. PubMed ID: 18051639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Species coexistence under resource competition with intraspecific and interspecific direct competition in a chemostat.
    Saito Y; Miki T
    Theor Popul Biol; 2010 Nov; 78(3):173-82. PubMed ID: 20674582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Positive interactions among competitors can produce species-rich communities.
    Gross K
    Ecol Lett; 2008 Sep; 11(9):929-36. PubMed ID: 18485001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biodiversity, habitat area, resource growth rate and interference competition.
    Kuang Y; Fagan WF; Loladze I
    Bull Math Biol; 2003 May; 65(3):497-518. PubMed ID: 12749536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evolution of nutrient uptake reveals a trade-off in the ecological stoichiometry of plant-herbivore interactions.
    Branco P; Stomp M; Egas M; Huisman J
    Am Nat; 2010 Dec; 176(6):E162-76. PubMed ID: 20942643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effective Resource Competition Model for Species Coexistence.
    Gupta D; Garlaschi S; Suweis S; Azaele S; Maritan A
    Phys Rev Lett; 2021 Nov; 127(20):208101. PubMed ID: 34860037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mechanistic analysis of interspecific competition using foraging trade-offs: implications for duck assemblages.
    Gurd DB
    Ecology; 2008 Feb; 89(2):495-505. PubMed ID: 18409438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Armstrong-McGehee mechanism revisited: competitive exclusion and coexistence of nonlinear consumers.
    Xiao X; Fussmann GF
    J Theor Biol; 2013 Dec; 339():26-35. PubMed ID: 23811237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Periodic coexistence of four species competing for three essential resources.
    Li B; Smith HL
    Math Biosci; 2003 Aug; 184(2):115-35. PubMed ID: 12832144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Coexistence in MacArthur-style consumer-resource models.
    Haygood R
    Theor Popul Biol; 2002 Mar; 61(2):215-23. PubMed ID: 11969391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mesoscale vortices and the paradox of the plankton.
    Bracco A; Provenzale A; Scheuring I
    Proc Biol Sci; 2000 Sep; 267(1454):1795-800. PubMed ID: 12233779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does local competition increase the coexistence of species in intransitive networks?
    Laird RA; Schamp BS
    Ecology; 2008 Jan; 89(1):237-47. PubMed ID: 18376565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.