These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18459377)

  • 1. Conformity among cowitnesses sharing same or different information about an event in experimental collaborative eyewitness testimony.
    Mori K; Mori H
    Percept Mot Skills; 2008 Feb; 106(1):275-90. PubMed ID: 18459377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Will your words become mine? underlying processes and cowitness intimacy in the memory conformity paradigm.
    Oeberst A; Seidemann J
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2014 Jun; 68(2):84-96. PubMed ID: 24708407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Investigating investigators: examining the impact of eyewitness identification evidence on student-investigators.
    Boyce MA; Lindsay DS; Brimacombe CA
    Law Hum Behav; 2008 Oct; 32(5):439-53. PubMed ID: 18060486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Co-witness information can have immediate effects on eyewitness memory reports.
    Shaw JS; Garven S; Wood JM
    Law Hum Behav; 1997 Oct; 21(5):503-23. PubMed ID: 9374604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does post-identification feedback affect evaluations of eyewitness testimony and identification procedures?
    Douglass AB; Neuschatz JS; Imrich J; Wilkinson M
    Law Hum Behav; 2010 Aug; 34(4):282-94. PubMed ID: 19585229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Criminal identification comparison: aural versus visual identifications resulting from a simulated crime.
    Hollien H; Bennett G; Gelfer MP
    J Forensic Sci; 1983 Jan; 28(1):208-21. PubMed ID: 6680738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effects of local and global processing orientation on eyewitness identification performance.
    Perfect TJ; Dennis I; Snell A
    Memory; 2007 Oct; 15(7):784-98. PubMed ID: 17852730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does methodology matter in eyewitness identification research? The effect of live versus video exposure on eyewitness identification accuracy.
    Pozzulo JD; Crescini C; Panton T
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2008; 31(5):430-7. PubMed ID: 18790535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Co-witness auditory memory conformity following discussion: a misinformation paradigm.
    Mori K; Kishikawa T
    Percept Mot Skills; 2014 Apr; 118(2):533-47. PubMed ID: 24897885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Eyewitness testimony.
    Wells GL; Olson EA
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2003; 54():277-95. PubMed ID: 12209024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The information gained from witnesses' responses to an initial "blank" lineup.
    Palmer MA; Brewer N; Weber N
    Law Hum Behav; 2012 Oct; 36(5):439-47. PubMed ID: 22468758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The impact of eyewitness identifications from simultaneous and sequential lineups.
    Wright DB
    Memory; 2007 Oct; 15(7):746-54. PubMed ID: 17852725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Can eyewitnesses correct for external influences on their lineup identifications? The actual/counterfactual assessment paradigm.
    Charman SD; Wells GL
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2008 Mar; 14(1):5-20. PubMed ID: 18377163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Judging veracity impairs eyewitnesses' memory of a perpetrator.
    Pickel KL; Kulig TC; Bauer HM
    Memory; 2013; 21(7):843-56. PubMed ID: 23350799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Post-identification feedback to eyewitnesses impairs evaluators' abilities to discriminate between accurate and mistaken testimony.
    Smalarz L; Wells GL
    Law Hum Behav; 2014 Apr; 38(2):194-202. PubMed ID: 24341835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Remembering with a friend or a stranger: comparing acquainted and unacquainted pairs in collaborative eyewitness interviews.
    Vredeveldt A; van Deuren S; van Koppen PJ
    Memory; 2019 Nov; 27(10):1390-1403. PubMed ID: 31500512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sequential lineup laps and eyewitness accuracy.
    Steblay NK; Dietrich HL; Ryan SL; Raczynski JL; James KA
    Law Hum Behav; 2011 Aug; 35(4):262-74. PubMed ID: 20632113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The dynamic interaction between eyewitnesses and interviewers: the impact of differences in perspective on memory reports and interviewer behavior.
    Douglass AB; Brewer N; Semmler C; Bustamante L; Hiley A
    Law Hum Behav; 2013 Aug; 37(4):290-301. PubMed ID: 23646916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Children's metacognitive judgments in an eyewitness identification task.
    Keast A; Brewer N; Wells GL
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2007 Aug; 97(4):286-314. PubMed ID: 17512942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Enhancing individual and collaborative eyewitness memory with category clustering recall.
    Thorley C
    Memory; 2018 Sep; 26(8):1128-1139. PubMed ID: 29376763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.