194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18462131)
1. Competition and coexistence with multiple life-history stages.
Moll JD; Brown JS
Am Nat; 2008 Jun; 171(6):839-43. PubMed ID: 18462131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Competitive exclusion and coexistence of species with complex life cycles.
Loreau M; Ebenhöh W
Theor Popul Biol; 1994 Aug; 46(1):58-77. PubMed ID: 8079197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Crossing habitat boundaries: coupling dynamics of ecosystems through complex life cycles.
Schreiber S; Rudolf VH
Ecol Lett; 2008 Jun; 11(6):576-87. PubMed ID: 18371091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. On evolution under symmetric and asymmetric competitions.
Zu J; Wang W; Takeuchi Y; Zu B; Wang K
J Theor Biol; 2008 Sep; 254(2):239-51. PubMed ID: 18601932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Community structure and the interplay between interspecific infection and competition.
Bowers RG; Turner J
J Theor Biol; 1997 Jul; 187(1):95-109. PubMed ID: 9236112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evolution of life-history traits collapses competitive coexistence.
Mougi A; Nishimura K
J Theor Biol; 2007 Oct; 248(3):552-9. PubMed ID: 17632128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Genetic variation promotes long-term coexistence of Brassica nigra and its competitors.
Lankau RA
Am Nat; 2009 Aug; 174(2):E40-53. PubMed ID: 19548840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mechanisms of coexistence in competitive metacommunities.
Amarasekare P; Hoopes MF; Mouquet N; Holyoak M
Am Nat; 2004 Sep; 164(3):310-26. PubMed ID: 15478087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hutchinson revisited: patterns of density regulation and the coexistence of strong competitors.
Münkemüller T; Bugmann H; Johst K
J Theor Biol; 2009 Jul; 259(1):109-17. PubMed ID: 19298829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Coexistence in metacommunities: a tree-species model.
Mena-Lorca J; Velasco-Hernández JX; Marquet PA
Math Biosci; 2006 Jul; 202(1):42-56. PubMed ID: 16797037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Competitive intransitivity promotes species coexistence.
Laird RA; Schamp BS
Am Nat; 2006 Aug; 168(2):182-93. PubMed ID: 16874628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predation-competition interactions for seasonally recruiting species.
Kuang JJ; Chesson P
Am Nat; 2008 Mar; 171(3):E119-33. PubMed ID: 18201119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Multiple attractors in a discrete competition model.
Edmunds JL
Theor Popul Biol; 2007 Nov; 72(3):379-88. PubMed ID: 17869318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Species coexistence, intransitivity, and topological variation in competitive tournaments.
Laird RA; Schamp BS
J Theor Biol; 2009 Jan; 256(1):90-5. PubMed ID: 18948120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evolution of the maturation rate collapses competitive coexistence.
Mougi A; Nishimura K
J Theor Biol; 2006 Aug; 241(3):467-76. PubMed ID: 16458325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multiple mixed-type attractors in a competition model.
Cushing JM; Henson SM; Blackburn CC
J Biol Dyn; 2007 Oct; 1(4):347-62. PubMed ID: 22876821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Consumer effects on the vital rates of their resource can determine the outcome of competition between consumers.
Lee CT; Miller TE; Inouye BD
Am Nat; 2011 Oct; 178(4):452-63. PubMed ID: 21956024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Competition and coexistence in regional habitats.
Wang ZL; Wang FZ; Chen S; Zhu MY
Am Nat; 2002 May; 159(5):498-508. PubMed ID: 18707432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Population dynamics of sexual and resource competition.
Yoshimura J; Clark CW
Theor Popul Biol; 1994 Apr; 45(2):121-31. PubMed ID: 8016751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Consumer-resource theory predicts dynamic transitions between outcomes of interspecific interactions.
Holland JN; DeAngelis DL
Ecol Lett; 2009 Dec; 12(12):1357-66. PubMed ID: 19807773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
