BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

541 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18462205)

  • 1. Patient satisfaction with implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a retrospective study.
    Siadat H; Alikhasi M; Mirfazaelian A; Geramipanah F; Zaery F
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 May; 10(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 18462205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Restoration with implants in patients with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa and patient satisfaction with the implant-supported superstructure.
    Peñarrocha M; Larrazábal C; Balaguer J; Serrano C; Silvestre J; Bagán JV
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):651-5. PubMed ID: 17929528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-retained overdentures and conventional dentures among middle-aged edentulous patients: satisfaction and functional assessment.
    Awad MA; Lund JP; Dufresne E; Feine JS
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 12737240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Five-year clinical results of immediately loaded dental implants using mandibular overdentures.
    Alfadda SA; Attard NJ; David LA
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):368-73. PubMed ID: 19639074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Oral health status and treatment satisfaction with mandibular implant overdentures and conventional dentures: a randomized clinical trial in a senior population.
    Awad MA; Lund JP; Shapiro SH; Locker D; Klemetti E; Chehade A; Savard A; Feine JS
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(4):390-6. PubMed ID: 12956494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Masticatory function and patient satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures: a prospective 5-year study.
    Bakke M; Holm B; Gotfredsen K
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(6):575-81. PubMed ID: 12475165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of attachment type and implant number on satisfaction and quality of life of mandibular implant-retained overdenture wearers.
    Mumcu E; Bilhan H; Geckili O
    Gerodontology; 2012 Jun; 29(2):e618-23. PubMed ID: 21726276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Implant-retained mandibular overdentures versus conventional dentures: 10 years of care and aftercare.
    Visser A; Meijer HJ; Raghoebar GM; Vissink A
    Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(3):271-8. PubMed ID: 16752625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. One-year prosthetic outcomes with implant overdentures: a randomized clinical trial.
    Walton JN; MacEntee MI; Glick N
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):391-8. PubMed ID: 12074455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A randomized clinical trial comparing patient satisfaction and prosthetic outcomes with mandibular overdentures retained by one or two implants.
    Walton JN; Glick N; Macentee MI
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):331-9. PubMed ID: 19639067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Patient satisfaction and preference with magnet, bar-clip, and ball-socket retained mandibular implant overdentures: a cross-over clinical trial.
    Cune M; van Kampen F; van der Bilt A; Bosman F
    Int J Prosthodont; 2005; 18(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 15889656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prosthetic aspects and patient satisfaction with resilient liner and clip attachments for bar- and implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a 3-year randomized clinical study.
    ELsyad MA
    Int J Prosthodont; 2012; 25(2):148-56. PubMed ID: 22371836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A clinical trial of patient satisfaction and prosthodontic needs with ball and bar attachments for implant-retained complete overdentures: three-year results.
    MacEntee MI; Walton JN; Glick N
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jan; 93(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 15623995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with a milled bar: a retrospective study.
    Krennmair G; Krainhöfner M; Piehslinger E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):987-94. PubMed ID: 18271381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sex differences in denture satisfaction.
    Pan S; Awad M; Thomason JM; Dufresne E; Kobayashi T; Kimoto S; Wollin SD; Feine JS
    J Dent; 2008 May; 36(5):301-8. PubMed ID: 18394770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Patient satisfaction with two designs of implant supported removable overdentures; ball attachment and magnets.
    Ellis JS; Burawi G; Walls A; Thomason JM
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Nov; 20(11):1293-8. PubMed ID: 19832769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Patient satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life outcomes of implant overdentures and fixed complete dentures.
    Brennan M; Houston F; O'Sullivan M; O'Connell B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(4):791-800. PubMed ID: 20657876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mandibular overdentures supported by two or four endosseous implants: a 10-year clinical trial.
    Meijer HJ; Raghoebar GM; Batenburg RH; Visser A; Vissink A
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jul; 20(7):722-8. PubMed ID: 19489933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relationship between prosthodontic evaluation and patient ratings of mandibular conventional and implant prostheses.
    Heydecke G; Klemetti E; Awad MA; Lund JP; Feine JS
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(3):307-12. PubMed ID: 12854797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A prospective 2-year clinical evaluation of overdentures attached to nonsplinted implants utilizing ERA attachments.
    Landa LS; Cho SC; Froum SJ; Elian N; Tarnow DP
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 13(2):151-6; quiz 158. PubMed ID: 11315434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 28.