849 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18462241)
1. Virtual colonoscopy vs conventional colonoscopy in patients at high risk of colorectal cancer--a prospective trial of 150 patients.
White TJ; Avery GR; Kennan N; Syed AM; Hartley JE; Monson JR
Colorectal Dis; 2009 Feb; 11(2):138-45. PubMed ID: 18462241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): blinded prospective comparison with conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal neoplasia.
Laghi A; Iannaccone R; Carbone I; Catalano C; Panebianco V; Di Giulio E; Schillaci A; Passariello R
Endoscopy; 2002 Jun; 34(6):441-6. PubMed ID: 12048624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical significance of virtual colonoscopy (CT colonography) with special reference to polyp morphology.
Kawamura YJ; Sasaki J; Okamaoto H; Okamoto S; Kobayashi Y; Tanaka O; Konishi F
Hepatogastroenterology; 2004; 51(60):1686-8. PubMed ID: 15532805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prospective comparison of contrast enhanced CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasms in a single institutional study using second-look colonoscopy with discrepant results.
Hoppe H; Netzer P; Spreng A; Quattropani C; Mattich J; Dinkel HP
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Oct; 99(10):1924-35. PubMed ID: 15447751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. CT colonoscopy of colorectal neoplasms: two-dimensional and three-dimensional virtual-reality techniques with colonoscopic correlation.
Royster AP; Fenlon HM; Clarke PD; Nunes DP; Ferrucci JT
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Nov; 169(5):1237-42. PubMed ID: 9353434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Current role and future potential of computed tomographic colonography for colorectal polyp detection and colon cancer screening-incidental findings.
Sohns C; Heuser M; Sossalla S; Wolff H; Obenauer S
Clin Imaging; 2008; 32(4):280-6. PubMed ID: 18603183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Magnetic resonance colonography versus colonoscopy as a diagnostic investigation for colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.
Purkayastha S; Tekkis PP; Athanasiou T; Aziz O; Negus R; Gedroyc W; Darzi AW
Clin Radiol; 2005 Sep; 60(9):980-9. PubMed ID: 16124980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [CT colonography: a new method for detecting colorectal cancer and polyps].
Ringstad G; Holmquist H; Brabrand K; Aaløkken TM; Hauge T
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2006 May; 126(11):1470-3. PubMed ID: 16732340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Colonoscopy and multidetector-array computed-tomographic colonography: detection rates and feasibility.
Ginnerup Pedersen B; Christiansen TE; Bjerregaard NC; Ljungmann K; Laurberg S
Endoscopy; 2003 Sep; 35(9):736-42. PubMed ID: 12929020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Could the colonic capsule PillCam Colon be clinically useful for selecting patients who deserve a complete colonoscopy?: results of clinical comparison with colonoscopy in the perspective of colorectal cancer screening.
Gay G; Delvaux M; Frederic M; Fassler I
Am J Gastroenterol; 2010 May; 105(5):1076-86. PubMed ID: 19888198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of CT colonography, colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy and faecal occult blood tests for the detection of advanced adenoma in an average risk population.
Graser A; Stieber P; Nagel D; Schäfer C; Horst D; Becker CR; Nikolaou K; Lottes A; Geisbüsch S; Kramer H; Wagner AC; Diepolder H; Schirra J; Roth HJ; Seidel D; Göke B; Reiser MF; Kolligs FT
Gut; 2009 Feb; 58(2):241-8. PubMed ID: 18852257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computed tomographic colonography and conventional colonoscopy for colon diseases: a prospective, blinded study.
Spinzi G; Belloni G; Martegani A; Sangiovanni A; Del Favero C; Minoli G
Am J Gastroenterol; 2001 Feb; 96(2):394-400. PubMed ID: 11232681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Colorectal polyps: detection with dark-lumen MR colonography versus conventional colonoscopy.
Hartmann D; Bassler B; Schilling D; Adamek HE; Jakobs R; Pfeifer B; Eickhoff A; Zindel C; Riemann JF; Layer G
Radiology; 2006 Jan; 238(1):143-9. PubMed ID: 16304088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Computed virtual chromoendoscopy for classification of small colorectal lesions: a prospective comparative study.
Pohl J; Nguyen-Tat M; Pech O; May A; Rabenstein T; Ell C
Am J Gastroenterol; 2008 Mar; 103(3):562-9. PubMed ID: 18070234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Colonoscopy in symptomatic patients with positive family history of colorectal cancer.
Charalambopoulos A; Syrigos KN; Ho JL; Murday VA; Leicester RJ
Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(3B):1991-4. PubMed ID: 10928139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sensitivity of diagnostic examinations for colorectal polyps.
Menardo G
Tech Coloproctol; 2004 Dec; 8 Suppl 2():s273-5. PubMed ID: 15666105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. MR colonography with limited bowel preparation compared with optical colonoscopy in patients at increased risk for colorectal cancer.
Florie J; Jensch S; Nievelstein RA; Bartelsman JF; Baak LC; van Gelder RE; Haberkorn B; van Randen A; van der Ham MM; Snel P; van der Hulst VP; Bossuyt PM; Stoker J
Radiology; 2007 Apr; 243(1):122-31. PubMed ID: 17329686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Current understanding of the role of virtual colonoscopy in abdominal diagnosis].
Hassan C; Iafrate F; Zullo A; Pichi A; Di Giulio E; Passariello R; Laghi A
Recenti Prog Med; 2009 Feb; 100(2):61-7. PubMed ID: 19350796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. CT colonography versus colonoscopy in the follow-up of patients after diverticulitis - a prospective, comparative study.
Hjern F; Jonas E; Holmström B; Josephson T; Mellgren A; Johansson C
Clin Radiol; 2007 Jul; 62(7):645-50. PubMed ID: 17556033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Considering virtual colonoscopy.
Rex DK
Rev Gastroenterol Disord; 2002; 2(3):97-105. PubMed ID: 12227217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
