These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
850 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18462241)
1. Virtual colonoscopy vs conventional colonoscopy in patients at high risk of colorectal cancer--a prospective trial of 150 patients. White TJ; Avery GR; Kennan N; Syed AM; Hartley JE; Monson JR Colorectal Dis; 2009 Feb; 11(2):138-45. PubMed ID: 18462241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): blinded prospective comparison with conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal neoplasia. Laghi A; Iannaccone R; Carbone I; Catalano C; Panebianco V; Di Giulio E; Schillaci A; Passariello R Endoscopy; 2002 Jun; 34(6):441-6. PubMed ID: 12048624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical significance of virtual colonoscopy (CT colonography) with special reference to polyp morphology. Kawamura YJ; Sasaki J; Okamaoto H; Okamoto S; Kobayashi Y; Tanaka O; Konishi F Hepatogastroenterology; 2004; 51(60):1686-8. PubMed ID: 15532805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prospective comparison of contrast enhanced CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasms in a single institutional study using second-look colonoscopy with discrepant results. Hoppe H; Netzer P; Spreng A; Quattropani C; Mattich J; Dinkel HP Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Oct; 99(10):1924-35. PubMed ID: 15447751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. CT colonoscopy of colorectal neoplasms: two-dimensional and three-dimensional virtual-reality techniques with colonoscopic correlation. Royster AP; Fenlon HM; Clarke PD; Nunes DP; Ferrucci JT AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Nov; 169(5):1237-42. PubMed ID: 9353434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Current role and future potential of computed tomographic colonography for colorectal polyp detection and colon cancer screening-incidental findings. Sohns C; Heuser M; Sossalla S; Wolff H; Obenauer S Clin Imaging; 2008; 32(4):280-6. PubMed ID: 18603183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Magnetic resonance colonography versus colonoscopy as a diagnostic investigation for colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Purkayastha S; Tekkis PP; Athanasiou T; Aziz O; Negus R; Gedroyc W; Darzi AW Clin Radiol; 2005 Sep; 60(9):980-9. PubMed ID: 16124980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [CT colonography: a new method for detecting colorectal cancer and polyps]. Ringstad G; Holmquist H; Brabrand K; Aaløkken TM; Hauge T Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2006 May; 126(11):1470-3. PubMed ID: 16732340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Could the colonic capsule PillCam Colon be clinically useful for selecting patients who deserve a complete colonoscopy?: results of clinical comparison with colonoscopy in the perspective of colorectal cancer screening. Gay G; Delvaux M; Frederic M; Fassler I Am J Gastroenterol; 2010 May; 105(5):1076-86. PubMed ID: 19888198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of CT colonography, colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy and faecal occult blood tests for the detection of advanced adenoma in an average risk population. Graser A; Stieber P; Nagel D; Schäfer C; Horst D; Becker CR; Nikolaou K; Lottes A; Geisbüsch S; Kramer H; Wagner AC; Diepolder H; Schirra J; Roth HJ; Seidel D; Göke B; Reiser MF; Kolligs FT Gut; 2009 Feb; 58(2):241-8. PubMed ID: 18852257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computed tomographic colonography and conventional colonoscopy for colon diseases: a prospective, blinded study. Spinzi G; Belloni G; Martegani A; Sangiovanni A; Del Favero C; Minoli G Am J Gastroenterol; 2001 Feb; 96(2):394-400. PubMed ID: 11232681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Computed virtual chromoendoscopy for classification of small colorectal lesions: a prospective comparative study. Pohl J; Nguyen-Tat M; Pech O; May A; Rabenstein T; Ell C Am J Gastroenterol; 2008 Mar; 103(3):562-9. PubMed ID: 18070234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Colonoscopy in symptomatic patients with positive family history of colorectal cancer. Charalambopoulos A; Syrigos KN; Ho JL; Murday VA; Leicester RJ Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(3B):1991-4. PubMed ID: 10928139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sensitivity of diagnostic examinations for colorectal polyps. Menardo G Tech Coloproctol; 2004 Dec; 8 Suppl 2():s273-5. PubMed ID: 15666105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. MR colonography with limited bowel preparation compared with optical colonoscopy in patients at increased risk for colorectal cancer. Florie J; Jensch S; Nievelstein RA; Bartelsman JF; Baak LC; van Gelder RE; Haberkorn B; van Randen A; van der Ham MM; Snel P; van der Hulst VP; Bossuyt PM; Stoker J Radiology; 2007 Apr; 243(1):122-31. PubMed ID: 17329686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Current understanding of the role of virtual colonoscopy in abdominal diagnosis]. Hassan C; Iafrate F; Zullo A; Pichi A; Di Giulio E; Passariello R; Laghi A Recenti Prog Med; 2009 Feb; 100(2):61-7. PubMed ID: 19350796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. CT colonography versus colonoscopy in the follow-up of patients after diverticulitis - a prospective, comparative study. Hjern F; Jonas E; Holmström B; Josephson T; Mellgren A; Johansson C Clin Radiol; 2007 Jul; 62(7):645-50. PubMed ID: 17556033 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]