These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18462513)

  • 1. Pathologic outcomes during the learning curve for robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
    Shah A; Okotie OT; Zhao L; Pins MR; Bhalani V; Dalton DP
    Int Braz J Urol; 2008; 34(2):159-62; discussion 163. PubMed ID: 18462513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The addition of robotic surgery to an established laparoscopic radical prostatectomy program: effect on positive surgical margins.
    Trabulsi EJ; Linden RA; Gomella LG; McGinnis DE; Strup SE; Lallas CD
    Can J Urol; 2008 Apr; 15(2):3994-9. PubMed ID: 18405448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
    Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
    J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative analysis of surgical margins between radical retropubic prostatectomy and RALP: are patients sacrificed during initiation of robotics program?
    White MA; De Haan AP; Stephens DD; Maatman TK; Maatman TJ
    Urology; 2009 Mar; 73(3):567-71. PubMed ID: 19167036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biochemical recurrence-free survival after robotic-assisted laparoscopic vs open radical prostatectomy for intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer.
    Ritch CR; You C; May AT; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Penson DF; Chang SS; Cookson MS; Smith JA; Barocas DA
    Urology; 2014 Jun; 83(6):1309-15. PubMed ID: 24746665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Operative details and oncological and functional outcome of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: 400 cases with a minimum of 12 months follow-up.
    Murphy DG; Kerger M; Crowe H; Peters JS; Costello AJ
    Eur Urol; 2009 Jun; 55(6):1358-66. PubMed ID: 19147274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Factors affecting surgical margin positivity in robotic assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Yuksel M; Karamık K; Anıl H; Islamoglu E; Ates M; Savas M
    Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2017 Mar; 89(1):71-74. PubMed ID: 28403595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy on surgical pathology specimens.
    Hong H; Mel L; Taylor J; Wu Q; Reeves H
    Diagn Pathol; 2012 Mar; 7():24. PubMed ID: 22414134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Minimally invasive radical prostatectomy: transition from pure laparoscopic to robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Trabulsi EJ; Zola JC; Colon-Herdman A; Heckman JE; Gomella LG; Lallas CD
    Arch Esp Urol; 2011 Oct; 64(8):823-9. PubMed ID: 22052763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Open vs. robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a single surgeon and pathologist comparison of pathologic and oncologic outcomes.
    Masterson TA; Cheng L; Boris RS; Koch MO
    Urol Oncol; 2013 Oct; 31(7):1043-8. PubMed ID: 22222059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Preliminary results of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) after fellowship training and experience in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP).
    Wolanski P; Chabert C; Jones L; Mullavey T; Walsh S; Gianduzzo T
    BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110 Suppl 4():64-70. PubMed ID: 23194128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating the learning curve of experienced laparoscopic surgeons in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Stolzenburg JU; Qazi HA; Holze S; Mende M; Nicolaus M; Franz T; Ho Thi P; Dietel A; Liatsikos E; Do M
    J Endourol; 2013 Jan; 27(1):80-5. PubMed ID: 22834963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Successful transfer of open surgical skills to a laparoscopic environment using a robotic interface: initial experience with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
    Ahlering TE; Skarecky D; Lee D; Clayman RV
    J Urol; 2003 Nov; 170(5):1738-41. PubMed ID: 14532766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic and radical retropubic prostatectomy generate similar positive margin rates in low and intermediate risk patients.
    Laurila TA; Huang W; Jarrard DF
    Urol Oncol; 2009; 27(5):529-33. PubMed ID: 18640061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Positive surgical margins in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: impact of learning curve on oncologic outcomes.
    Atug F; Castle EP; Srivastav SK; Burgess SV; Thomas R; Davis R
    Eur Urol; 2006 May; 49(5):866-71; discussion 871-2. PubMed ID: 16564614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of positive surgical margin rates in high risk prostate cancer: open versus minimally invasive radical prostatectomy.
    Harty NJ; Kozinn SI; Canes D; Sorcini A; Moinzadeh A
    Int Braz J Urol; 2013; 39(5):639-46; discussion 647-8. PubMed ID: 24267107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Characteristics of positive surgical margins in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy, open retropubic radical prostatectomy, and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a comparative histopathologic study from a single academic center.
    Albadine R; Hyndman ME; Chaux A; Jeong JY; Saab S; Tavora F; Epstein JI; Gonzalgo ML; Pavlovich CP; Netto GJ
    Hum Pathol; 2012 Feb; 43(2):254-60. PubMed ID: 21820147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Histopathologic outcomes of robotic radical prostatectomy.
    Patel VR; Shah S; Arend D
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2006 Jun; 6():2566-72. PubMed ID: 17619732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perineural invasion status, Gleason score and number of positive cores in biopsy pathology are predictors of positive surgical margin following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
    Yang R; Cao K; Han T; Zhang YF; Zhang GT; Xu LF; Lian HB; Li XG; Guo HQ
    Asian J Androl; 2017; 19(4):468-472. PubMed ID: 27004537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A direct comparison of robotic assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single institution experience.
    Rozet F; Jaffe J; Braud G; Harmon J; Cathelineau X; Barret E; Vallancien G
    J Urol; 2007 Aug; 178(2):478-82. PubMed ID: 17561160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.