These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18462710)

  • 61. Right up there: hemispatial and hand asymmetries of altitudinal pseudoneglect.
    Suavansri K; Falchook AD; Williamson JB; Heilman KM
    Brain Cogn; 2012 Aug; 79(3):216-20. PubMed ID: 22546730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Spatial biases in peripersonal space in sighted and blind individuals revealed by a haptic line bisection paradigm.
    Cattaneo Z; Fantino M; Tinti C; Pascual-Leone A; Silvanto J; Vecchi T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Aug; 37(4):1110-21. PubMed ID: 21517214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. [Presenting a battery for assessing spatial neglect. Norms and effects of age, educational level, sex, hand and laterality].
    Rousseaux M; Beis JM; Pradat-Diehl P; Martin Y; Bartolomeo P; Bernati T; Chokron S; Leclercq M; Louis-Dreyfus A; Marchal F; Perennou D; Prairial C; Rode G; Samuel C; Sieroff E; Wiart L; Azouvi P
    Rev Neurol (Paris); 2001 Nov; 157(11 Pt 1):1385-400. PubMed ID: 11924007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Pseudoneglect in back space.
    Cocchini G; Watling R; Della Sala S; Jansari A
    Brain Cogn; 2007 Feb; 63(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 16934381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Poor hand-pointing to sounds in right brain-damaged patients: not just a problem of spatial-hearing.
    Pavani F; Farné A; Làdavas E
    Brain Cogn; 2005 Dec; 59(3):215-24. PubMed ID: 16112784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Radial character-line bisection.
    Jeong Y; Drago V; Heilman KM
    Cogn Behav Neurol; 2006 Jun; 19(2):105-8. PubMed ID: 16783133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. When they see, they see it almost right: normal subjective experience of detected stimuli in spatial neglect.
    Bonneh YS; Sagi D; Gorea A; Soroker N; Treger J; Pavlovskaya M
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Nov; 446(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 18822347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Differential frontal activation during exogenous and endogenous orientation of visuospatial attention. A near-infrared spectroscopy study.
    Takahashi M; Ikegami M
    Neuropsychobiology; 2008; 58(2):55-64. PubMed ID: 18832860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Immediate and delayed reaching in hemispatial neglect.
    Rossit S; Muir K; Reeves I; Duncan G; Birschel P; Harvey M
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 May; 47(6):1563-72. PubMed ID: 18771672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Isolating event-related potential components associated with voluntary control of visuo-spatial attention.
    McDonald JJ; Green JJ
    Brain Res; 2008 Aug; 1227():96-109. PubMed ID: 18621037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Effects of allocation of visuo-spatial attention to visual stimuli triggering unilateral arm abduction on anticipatory postural control.
    Tomita H; Fujiwara K
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Sep; 119(9):2086-97. PubMed ID: 18620907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Long lasting egocentric disorientation induced by normal sensori-motor spatial interaction.
    Dupierrix E; Gresty M; Ohlmann T; Chokron S
    PLoS One; 2009; 4(2):e4465. PubMed ID: 19212433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Subjective time in near and far representational space.
    Zäch P; Brugger P
    Cogn Behav Neurol; 2008 Mar; 21(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 18327017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. An ERP investigation on visuotactile interactions in peripersonal and extrapersonal space: evidence for the spatial rule.
    Sambo CF; Forster B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 21(8):1550-9. PubMed ID: 18767919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Modulation of hemispatial neglect by directional and numerical cues in the line bisection task.
    Bonato M; Priftis K; Marenzi R; Zorzi M
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Jan; 46(2):426-33. PubMed ID: 17931670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Integration of cortical areas during performance of a catching ball task.
    Machado S; Cunha M; Portella CE; Silva JG; Velasques B; Bastos VH; Budde H; Pompeu F; Basile L; Cagy M; Piedade R; Ribeiro P
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Nov; 446(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 18822348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Spatial-attention and emotional evocation: line bisection performance and visual art emotional evocation.
    Drago V; Finney GR; Foster PS; Amengual A; Jeong Y; Mizuno T; Crucian GP; Heilman KM
    Brain Cogn; 2008 Mar; 66(2):140-4. PubMed ID: 17681657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. A foundation for savantism? Visuo-spatial synaesthetes present with cognitive benefits.
    Simner J; Mayo N; Spiller MJ
    Cortex; 2009; 45(10):1246-60. PubMed ID: 19665699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. A different outlook on time: visual and auditory month names elicit different mental vantage points for a time-space synaesthete.
    Jarick M; Dixon MJ; Stewart MT; Maxwell EC; Smilek D
    Cortex; 2009; 45(10):1217-28. PubMed ID: 19665700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Handedness and calendar orientations in time-space synaesthesia.
    Brang D; Teuscher U; Miller LE; Ramachandran VS; Coulson S
    J Neuropsychol; 2011 Sep; 5(2):323-32. PubMed ID: 21923792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.