BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

757 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18462852)

  • 1. Face bow and articulator for planning orthognathic surgery: 1 face bow.
    Walker F; Ayoub AF; Moos KF; Barbenel J
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Oct; 46(7):567-72. PubMed ID: 18462852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Face bow and articulator for planning orthognathic surgery: 2 articulator.
    Walker F; Ayoub AF; Moos KF; Barbenel J
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Oct; 46(7):573-8. PubMed ID: 18462853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative study between 2 methods of mounting models in semiadjustable articulator for orthognathic surgery.
    Mayrink G; Sawazaki R; Asprino L; de Moraes M; Fernandes Moreira RW
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 69(11):2879-82. PubMed ID: 21496992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Face-bow record without a third point of reference: theoretical considerations and an alternative technique.
    Ercoli C; Graser GN; Tallents RH; Galindo D
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Aug; 82(2):237-41. PubMed ID: 10424992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of two face-bow/semi-adjustable articulator systems in transferring the maxillary occlusal cant.
    Nazir N; Sujesh M; Kumar R; Sreenivas P
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 23257473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of an improved orthognathic articulator system: 1. Accuracy of cast orientation.
    Paul PE; Barbenel JC; Walker FS; Khambay BS; Moos KF; Ayoub AF
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Feb; 41(2):150-4. PubMed ID: 22047955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of 3 methods of face-bow transfer recording: implications for orthognathic surgery.
    Gateno J; Forrest KK; Camp B
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Jun; 59(6):635-40; discussion 640-1. PubMed ID: 11381385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of an improved orthognathic articulator system. 2. Accuracy of occlusal wafers.
    Paul PE; Barbenel JC; Walker FS; Khambay BS; Moos KF; Ayoub AF
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Feb; 41(2):155-9. PubMed ID: 22047954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An evaluation of face-bow transfer for the planning of orthognathic surgery.
    Zizelmann C; Hammer B; Gellrich NC; Schwestka-Polly R; Rana M; Bucher P
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Aug; 70(8):1944-50. PubMed ID: 22079061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Comparative analysis of edentulous patients treated traditionally and with the use of a face-bow and Quick Master articulator].
    Kubrak J
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 1998; 44():237-49. PubMed ID: 9857542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Angle between occlusal plane and horizontal plane of articulators with quick mounting face bow].
    Celebić A; Kraljević K; Valentić-Peruzović M; Zivković Z; Stipetić J
    Acta Stomatol Croat; 1989; 23(2):137-43. PubMed ID: 2635567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A prototype articulator for planning orthognathic and craniofacial surgery.
    Angelillo JC; Georgiade NG; Rabe WC
    J Oral Surg; 1977 Oct; 35(10):847-9. PubMed ID: 269238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of face-bow transfer: effect on surgical prediction and postsurgical result.
    Ellis E; Tharanon W; Gambrell K
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1992 Jun; 50(6):562-7. PubMed ID: 1593315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of three facebow/semi-adjustable articulator systems for planning orthognathic surgery.
    O'Malley AM; Milosevic A
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2000 Jun; 38(3):185-90. PubMed ID: 10864723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A study on the use of the dentatus AEB face bow and its modification as an ear bow.
    Likeman PR; Cabot LB
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1999; 7(2):85-8. PubMed ID: 10865386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How accurate is model planning for orthognathic surgery?
    Sharifi A; Jones R; Ayoub A; Moos K; Walker F; Khambay B; McHugh S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Dec; 37(12):1089-93. PubMed ID: 18760569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparative study of two arbitrary face-bow transfer systems for orthognathic surgery planning.
    Bamber MA; Firouzal R; Harris M; Linney A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1996 Oct; 25(5):339-43. PubMed ID: 8961011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Uses of the occlusal registration instrument (ORI)].
    Ott K; Bock O; Petschelt A
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1979 May; 34(5):417-20. PubMed ID: 288562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of the Kois Dento-Facial Analyzer System with an earbow for mounting a maxillary cast.
    Lux LH; Thompson GA; Waliszewski KJ; Ziebert GJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Sep; 114(3):432-9. PubMed ID: 25979448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Single step approach to make diagnostic impressions of both the arches and face bow transfer: a novel technique.
    Komuravelli AK; Suresh Sajjan MC
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 22842240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 38.