These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18464759)

  • 1. Courts deny Pfizer access.
    Gura T
    Nat Biotechnol; 2008 May; 26(5):480. PubMed ID: 18464759
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Peer review. Pfizer denied access to journals' files.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2008 Mar; 319(5870):1601. PubMed ID: 18356495
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Confidential review--or not?
    Kennedy D
    Science; 2008 Feb; 319(5866):1009. PubMed ID: 18292308
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Crunch time for peer review in lawsuit.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 2008 Mar; 452(7183):6-7. PubMed ID: 18322484
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Peer review in the balance.
    Curfman GD; Morrissey S; Annas GJ; Drazen JM
    N Engl J Med; 2008 May; 358(21):2276-7. PubMed ID: 18499571
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The public-access movement.
    Paquette M
    Perspect Psychiatr Care; 2005; 41(2):49-50. PubMed ID: 15924574
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Who owns the data?
    Blei AT
    Hepatology; 2004 Dec; 40(6):1237. PubMed ID: 15558736
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Preserving confidentiality in the peer review process.
    DeAngelis CD; Thornton JP
    JAMA; 2008 Apr; 299(16):1956. PubMed ID: 18362123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [American judge preserves confidentiality in the peer review process].
    Overbeke AJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Jul; 152(28):1555-6. PubMed ID: 18712221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Open access is not only a vision. The development towards free access to research results has already started].
    Tillhammar P
    Lakartidningen; 2005 Jul 25-Aug 7; 102(30-31):2162-3. PubMed ID: 16111108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Open access mandate threatens dissemination of scientific information.
    McMullan E
    J Neuroophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 28(1):72-4. PubMed ID: 18347464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. US legal principles and confidentiality of the peer review process.
    Parrish DM; Bruns DE
    JAMA; 2002 Jun; 287(21):2839-41. PubMed ID: 12038928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Defamation bill gives defence of qualified privilege to peer reviewed journal articles.
    Dyer C
    BMJ; 2013 Apr; 346():f2691. PubMed ID: 23618725
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Congress may force drug firms to reveal clinical trial data.
    Check E
    Nature; 2004 Sep; 431(7006):232. PubMed ID: 15371992
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Extension of US trade embargoes to science editing.
    Habibzadeh F
    Lancet; 2004 Apr; 363(9415):1160. PubMed ID: 15064039
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Out in the open.
    Nat Biotechnol; 2005 Feb; 23(2):153. PubMed ID: 15696130
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Expose your clinical thinking.
    Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Aug; 22(8):927. PubMed ID: 15286628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Company disputes scientist's right to publication.
    Ready T
    Nat Med; 2000 Dec; 6(12):1302. PubMed ID: 11100094
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. If it's too good to be true, it probably is.
    Kennedy MS
    Am J Nurs; 2009 Dec; 109(12):7. PubMed ID: 19935148
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Drug review "behind the curtain": a response to Professor Struve.
    O'Reilly JT
    Cornell Law Rev; 2008 Jul; 93(5):1075-90. PubMed ID: 18618971
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.