These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

617 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18464770)

  • 21. What ails the FDA?
    Jenny-Avital ER
    N Engl J Med; 2005 Jun; 352(24):2554-5. PubMed ID: 15962407
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. They are from the government and they really are here to help you.
    Woosley RL
    J Clin Pharmacol; 2008 Feb; 48(2):142-3. PubMed ID: 18199889
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The drive to reform the FDA gains momentum.
    Gatty B
    Hosp Formul; 1995 Mar; 30(3):178, 177. PubMed ID: 10141250
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Vision and will: the future of the FDA.
    Epstein D
    Oncologist; 2009 Apr; 14(4):317-9. PubMed ID: 19365098
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Communicating with the FDA: the "third rail" of a new model for drug development.
    Stanski DR; Orloff JJ
    J Clin Pharmacol; 2008 Feb; 48(2):144-5. PubMed ID: 18199890
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Key factors in the rising cost of new drug discovery and development.
    Dickson M; Gagnon JP
    Nat Rev Drug Discov; 2004 May; 3(5):417-29. PubMed ID: 15136789
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. BIO and biogenerics.
    Feldbaum CB
    Nat Biotechnol; 2005 Jan; 23(1):17; discussion 17. PubMed ID: 15637607
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. FDA restructures new product review centers.
    Bouchie A
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Oct; 20(10):960. PubMed ID: 12355100
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Dynavax trial halted.
    DeFrancesco L
    Nat Biotechnol; 2008 May; 26(5):484. PubMed ID: 18464766
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Uncertainty surrounds cancer vaccine review at FDA.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2007 Aug; 25(8):827-8. PubMed ID: 17687346
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The FDA's new oncology office.
    Pazdur R
    Clin Adv Hematol Oncol; 2005 Aug; 3(8):612-3. PubMed ID: 16167044
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Trouble at the office.
    Allison M
    Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Sep; 26(9):967-9. PubMed ID: 18779797
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Accelerated approval dust begins to settle.
    Mullard A
    Nat Rev Drug Discov; 2011 Oct; 10(11):797-8. PubMed ID: 22037027
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Who would approve new drugs if there were no FDA?
    Gatty B
    Hosp Formul; 1995 Jan; 30(1):58, 57. PubMed ID: 10139726
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Errors in 'Trials and error'.
    Miller DD
    Nat Biotechnol; 2006 Jul; 24(7):747. PubMed ID: 16841048
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Drive for drugs leads to baby clinical trials.
    Nature; 2006 Mar; 440(7083):406-7. PubMed ID: 16554774
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Clinical research: outlook from industry.
    Echols R
    Clin Perform Qual Health Care; 1996; 4(2):113-4. PubMed ID: 10156942
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The big gap at the FDA.
    Stipp D
    Fortune; 2002 Jul; 146(2):113-4, 116. PubMed ID: 12141178
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Today's FDA.
    Slater EE
    N Engl J Med; 2005 Jan; 352(3):293-7. PubMed ID: 15659733
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. FDA embraces risk-management approach.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Oct; 21(10):1120-1. PubMed ID: 14520383
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 31.