386 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18465321)
1. Participation behaviour following a false positive test in the Copenhagen mammography screening programme.
Andersen SB; Vejborg I; von Euler-Chelpin M
Acta Oncol; 2008; 47(4):550-5. PubMed ID: 18465321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mammography screening for breast cancer in Copenhagen April 1991-March 1997. Mammography Screening Evaluation Group.
Lynge E
APMIS Suppl; 1998; 83():1-44. PubMed ID: 9850674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Predicting the risk of a false-positive test for women following a mammography screening programme.
Njor SH; Olsen AH; Schwartz W; Vejborg I; Lynge E
J Med Screen; 2007; 14(2):94-7. PubMed ID: 17626709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The cumulative risk of a false-positive recall in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program.
Hofvind S; Thoresen S; Tretli S
Cancer; 2004 Oct; 101(7):1501-7. PubMed ID: 15378474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Differences between first and subsequent rounds of the MRISC breast cancer screening program for women with a familial or genetic predisposition.
Kriege M; Brekelmans CT; Boetes C; Muller SH; Zonderland HM; Obdeijn IM; Manoliu RA; Kok T; Rutgers EJ; de Koning HJ; Klijn JG;
Cancer; 2006 Jun; 106(11):2318-26. PubMed ID: 16615112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of false-positives and women's characteristics on long-term adherence to breast cancer screening.
Román R; Sala M; De La Vega M; Natal C; Galceran J; González-Román I; Baroja A; Zubizarreta R; Ascunce N; Salas D; Castells X
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2011 Nov; 130(2):543-52. PubMed ID: 21617920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Women's anxieties caused by false positives in mammography screening: a contingent valuation survey.
Yasunaga H; Ide H; Imamura T; Ohe K
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Jan; 101(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 16821083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Association of diagnostic work-up with subsequent attendance in a breast cancer screening program for false-positive cases.
Seigneurin A; Exbrayat C; Labarère J; Delafosse P; Poncet F; Colonna M
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2011 May; 127(1):221-8. PubMed ID: 20809364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Psychological consequences of breast cancer screening among healthy women].
von Bülow B
Ugeskr Laeger; 2000 Feb; 162(8):1053-9. PubMed ID: 10741242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Balancing sensitivity and specificity: sixteen year's of experience from the mammography screening programme in Copenhagen, Denmark.
Utzon-Frank N; Vejborg I; von Euler-Chelpin M; Lynge E
Cancer Epidemiol; 2011 Oct; 35(5):393-8. PubMed ID: 21239242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minority report - false negative breast assessment in women recalled for suspicious screening mammography: imaging and pathological features, and associated delay in diagnosis.
Ciatto S; Houssami N; Ambrogetti D; Bonardi R; Collini G; Del Turco MR
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Sep; 105(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 17115112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cumulative false positive recall rate and association with participant related factors in a population based breast cancer screening programme.
Castells X; Molins E; Macià F
J Epidemiol Community Health; 2006 Apr; 60(4):316-21. PubMed ID: 16537348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mammography screening in the county of Fyn. November 1993-December 1999.
Njor SH; Olsen AH; Bellstrøm T; Dyreborg U; Bak M; Axelsson C; Graversen HP; Schwartz W; Lynge E
APMIS Suppl; 2003; (110):1-33. PubMed ID: 12739252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Does educational level determine screening participation?
von Euler-Chelpin M; Olsen AH; Njor S; Jensen A; Vejborg I; Schwartz W; Lynge E
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2008 Jun; 17(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 18414200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Experience with breast cancer, pre-screening perceived susceptibility and the psychological impact of screening.
Absetz P; Aro AR; Sutton SR
Psychooncology; 2003 Jun; 12(4):305-18. PubMed ID: 12748969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. "False alarm" mammography results--how do women react?
Kahn BE
LDI Issue Brief; 2003 Feb; 8(5):1-4. PubMed ID: 12678009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pattern of participation in a cohort aged 50-60 years at first invitation to the service-screening programme with mammography in Stockholm county, Sweden.
Törnberg S; Kemetli L; Svane G; Rosén M; Stenbeck M; Nyström L
Prev Med; 2005; 41(3-4):728-33. PubMed ID: 16137757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predictors of breast cancer-related distress following mammography screening in younger women on a family history breast screening programme.
Brain K; Henderson BJ; Tyndel S; Bankhead C; Watson E; Clements A; Austoker J;
Psychooncology; 2008 Dec; 17(12):1180-8. PubMed ID: 18506670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Overuse of mammography during the first round of an organized breast cancer screening programme.
Chamot E; Charvet A; Perneger TV
J Eval Clin Pract; 2009 Aug; 15(4):620-5. PubMed ID: 19522725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Increased risk of breast cancer in women with false-positive test: the role of misclassification.
von Euler-Chelpin M; Kuchiki M; Vejborg I
Cancer Epidemiol; 2014 Oct; 38(5):619-22. PubMed ID: 25035157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
