These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18465722)

  • 21. Identifying glaucomatous vision loss with visual-function-specific perimetry in the diagnostic innovations in glaucoma study.
    Sample PA; Medeiros FA; Racette L; Pascual JP; Boden C; Zangwill LM; Bowd C; Weinreb RN
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 47(8):3381-9. PubMed ID: 16877406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Correlation of blue-on-yellow visual fields with scanning confocal laser optic disc measurements.
    Teesalu P; Vihanninjoki K; Airaksinen PJ; Tuulonen A; Läärä E
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1997 Nov; 38(12):2452-9. PubMed ID: 9375562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Corneal thickness measurements and frequency doubling technology perimetry abnormalities in ocular hypertensive eyes.
    Medeiros FA; Sample PA; Weinreb RN
    Ophthalmology; 2003 Oct; 110(10):1903-8. PubMed ID: 14522761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Influence of learning effect on reliability parameters and global indices of standard automated perimetry in cases of primary open angle glaucoma.
    Tiwari US; Aishwarya A; Bhale A
    Rom J Ophthalmol; 2018; 62(4):277-281. PubMed ID: 30891523
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Blue-on-yellow perimetry using an Armaly glaucoma screening program.
    Maeda H; Tanaka Y; Nakamura M; Yamamoto M
    Ophthalmologica; 1999; 213(2):71-5. PubMed ID: 9885383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Comparitive study of the threshold variability between blue-on-yellow perimetry and white-on-white perimetry].
    Zhong Y; Ye W; Gao J; Yu F; Wang K
    Yan Ke Xue Bao; 2002 Jun; 18(2):87-91. PubMed ID: 15510643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Detection of glaucomatous visual field defect by nonconventional perimetry.
    Iester M; Altieri M; Vittone P; Calabria G; Zingirian M; Traverso CE
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2003 Jan; 135(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 12504694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Relationship between Humphrey 30-2 SITA Standard Test, Matrix 30-2 threshold test, and Heidelberg retina tomograph in ocular hypertensive and glaucoma patients.
    Bozkurt B; Yilmaz PT; Irkec M
    J Glaucoma; 2008; 17(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 18414106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Frequency-doubling perimetry: comparison with standard automated perimetry to detect glaucoma.
    Leeprechanon N; Giangiacomo A; Fontana H; Hoffman D; Caprioli J
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Feb; 143(2):263-271. PubMed ID: 17178091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Short wavelength automated perimetry, frequency doubling technology perimetry, and pattern electroretinography for prediction of progressive glaucomatous standard visual field defects.
    Bayer AU; Erb C
    Ophthalmology; 2002 May; 109(5):1009-17. PubMed ID: 11986111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Relationship between indices of Humphrey perimetry and Frequency Doubling Technology Perimetry in glaucoma.
    Fukushima A; Shirakashi M; Yaoeda K; Funaki S; Funaki H; Ofuchi N; Abe H
    J Glaucoma; 2004 Apr; 13(2):114-9. PubMed ID: 15097256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Pulsar perimetry in the diagnosis of early glaucoma.
    Zeppieri M; Brusini P; Parisi L; Johnson CA; Sampaolesi R; Salvetat ML
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2010 Jan; 149(1):102-12. PubMed ID: 19800607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Progression of visual field in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma - ProgF study 1.
    Aptel F; Aryal-Charles N; Giraud JM; El Chehab H; Delbarre M; Chiquet C; Romanet JP; Renard JP
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2015 Dec; 93(8):e615-20. PubMed ID: 26095771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Learning effect of humphrey matrix frequency doubling technology perimetry in patients with ocular hypertension.
    Centofanti M; Fogagnolo P; Oddone F; Orzalesi N; Vetrugno M; Manni G; Rossetti L
    J Glaucoma; 2008 Sep; 17(6):436-41. PubMed ID: 18794676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [A comparative analysis of standard automated perimetry and short wavelength automated perimetry in early diagnosis of glaucoma].
    Chiseliţă D; Crenguţa MI; Danielescu C; Mihaela NM
    Oftalmologia; 2006; 50(2):94-102. PubMed ID: 16927766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Frequency doubling perimetry in ocular hypertension and chronic open angle glaucoma.
    Cellini M; Torreggiani A
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand Suppl; 2002; 236():24-5. PubMed ID: 12390120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of high-pass resolution perimetry and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma.
    Martinez GA; Sample PA; Weinreb RN
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1995 Feb; 119(2):195-201. PubMed ID: 7832226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Rarebit perimetry and frequency doubling technology in patients with ocular hypertension.
    Corallo G; Iester M; Scotto R; Calabria G; Traverso CE
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2008; 18(2):205-11. PubMed ID: 18320512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Testing for glaucoma with frequency-doubling perimetry in normals, ocular hypertensives, and glaucoma patients.
    Horn FK; Wakili N; Jünemann AM; Korth M
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2002 Aug; 240(8):658-65. PubMed ID: 12192460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Flicker-defined form perimetry in glaucoma patients.
    Horn FK; Kremers J; Mardin CY; Jünemann AG; Adler W; Tornow RP
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2015 Mar; 253(3):447-55. PubMed ID: 25511293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.