These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18467776)

  • 1. CGHsweep: an algorithm for analyzing chromosomal aberrations in genome using aCGH profiles.
    Karmaker A; Kwek S
    In Silico Biol; 2007; 7(6):639-49. PubMed ID: 18467776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A method for calling gains and losses in array CGH data.
    Wang P; Kim Y; Pollack J; Narasimhan B; Tibshirani R
    Biostatistics; 2005 Jan; 6(1):45-58. PubMed ID: 15618527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computational methods for identification of recurrent copy number alteration patterns by array CGH.
    Shah SP
    Cytogenet Genome Res; 2008; 123(1-4):343-51. PubMed ID: 19287173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Genome-wide aberrations in pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
    Nowak NJ; Gaile D; Conroy JM; McQuaid D; Cowell J; Carter R; Goggins MG; Hruban RH; Maitra A
    Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2005 Aug; 161(1):36-50. PubMed ID: 16080956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Oligonucleotide array-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) of 90 neuroblastomas reveals aberration patterns closely associated with relapse pattern and outcome.
    Spitz R; Oberthuer A; Zapatka M; Brors B; Hero B; Ernestus K; Oestreich J; Fischer M; Simon T; Berthold F
    Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2006 Dec; 45(12):1130-42. PubMed ID: 16958102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Identification of significant regional genetic variations using continuous CNV values in aCGH data.
    Kim KY; Lee GY; Kim J; Jeung HC; Chung HC; Rha SY
    Genomics; 2009 Nov; 94(5):317-23. PubMed ID: 19699295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Screening for submicroscopic chromosomal rearrangements in Wilms tumor using whole-genome microarrays.
    Rassekh SR; Chan S; Harvard C; Dix D; Qiao Y; Rajcan-Separovic E
    Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2008 Apr; 182(2):84-94. PubMed ID: 18406869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A shifting level model algorithm that identifies aberrations in array-CGH data.
    Magi A; Benelli M; Marseglia G; Nannetti G; Scordo MR; Torricelli F
    Biostatistics; 2010 Apr; 11(2):265-80. PubMed ID: 19948744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. CGH microarrays and cancer.
    Kallioniemi A
    Curr Opin Biotechnol; 2008 Feb; 19(1):36-40. PubMed ID: 18162393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Across array comparative genomic hybridization: a strategy to reduce reference channel hybridizations.
    Buffart TE; Israeli D; Tijssen M; Vosse SJ; Mrsić A; Meijer GA; Ylstra B
    Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2008 Nov; 47(11):994-1004. PubMed ID: 18663753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Robust smooth segmentation approach for array CGH data analysis.
    Huang J; Gusnanto A; O'Sullivan K; Staaf J; Borg A; Pawitan Y
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Sep; 23(18):2463-9. PubMed ID: 17660206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Identification of DNA copy number aberrations associated with metastases of colorectal cancer using array CGH profiles.
    Nakao M; Kawauchi S; Furuya T; Uchiyama T; Adachi J; Okada T; Ikemoto K; Oga A; Sasaki K
    Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2009 Jan; 188(2):70-6. PubMed ID: 19100508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Somatic alterations in the human cancer genome.
    Weir B; Zhao X; Meyerson M
    Cancer Cell; 2004 Nov; 6(5):433-8. PubMed ID: 15542426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A fast and flexible method for the segmentation of aCGH data.
    Ben-Yaacov E; Eldar YC
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Aug; 24(16):i139-45. PubMed ID: 18689815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Chromosomal aberrations in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas in Norwegian and Sudanese populations by array comparative genomic hybridization.
    Roman E; Meza-Zepeda LA; Kresse SH; Myklebost O; Vasstrand EN; Ibrahim SO
    Oncol Rep; 2008 Oct; 20(4):825-43. PubMed ID: 18813824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A GC-wave correction algorithm that improves the analytical performance of aCGH.
    Leo A; Walker AM; Lebo MS; Hendrickson B; Scholl T; Akmaev VR
    J Mol Diagn; 2012 Nov; 14(6):550-9. PubMed ID: 22922130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mapping Drosophila genomic aberration breakpoints with comparative genome hybridization on microarrays.
    Erickson JN; Spana EP
    Methods Enzymol; 2006; 410():377-86. PubMed ID: 16938561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The array CGH and its clinical applications.
    Shinawi M; Cheung SW
    Drug Discov Today; 2008 Sep; 13(17-18):760-70. PubMed ID: 18617013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. High-resolution copy number arrays in cancer and the problem of normal genome copy number variation.
    Gorringe KL; Campbell IG
    Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2008 Nov; 47(11):933-8. PubMed ID: 18663746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A genome-wide screen reveals functional gene clusters in the cancer genome and identifies EphA2 as a mitogen in glioblastoma.
    Liu F; Park PJ; Lai W; Maher E; Chakravarti A; Durso L; Jiang X; Yu Y; Brosius A; Thomas M; Chin L; Brennan C; DePinho RA; Kohane I; Carroll RS; Black PM; Johnson MD
    Cancer Res; 2006 Nov; 66(22):10815-23. PubMed ID: 17090523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.