These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

313 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18469208)

  • 1. Numeracy and the perception and communication of risk.
    Peters E
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2008 Apr; 1128():1-7. PubMed ID: 18469208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Numeracy skill and the communication, comprehension, and use of risk-benefit information.
    Peters E; Hibbard J; Slovic P; Dieckmann N
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2007; 26(3):741-8. PubMed ID: 17485752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation of the Subjective Numeracy Scale: effects of low numeracy on comprehension of risk communications and utility elicitations.
    Zikmund-Fisher BJ; Smith DM; Ubel PA; Fagerlin A
    Med Decis Making; 2007; 27(5):663-71. PubMed ID: 17652180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. When the facts are just not enough: credibly communicating about risk is riskier when emotions run high and time is short.
    Reynolds BJ
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2011 Jul; 254(2):206-14. PubMed ID: 21034761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of risk communication formats on risk perception depending on numeracy.
    Keller C; Siegrist M
    Med Decis Making; 2009; 29(4):483-90. PubMed ID: 19525484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The ethics of health communication.
    Strasser T; Gallagher J
    World Health Forum; 1994; 15(2):175-7. PubMed ID: 8018285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Primer: Demystifying risk--understanding and communicating medical risks.
    Crowson CS; Therneau TM; Matteson EL; Gabriel SE
    Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol; 2007 Mar; 3(3):181-7; quiz 1 p following 187. PubMed ID: 17334341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evidence-based patient information about treatment of multiple sclerosis--a phase one study on comprehension and emotional responses.
    Kasper J; Köpke S; Mühlhauser I; Heesen C
    Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Jul; 62(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 16098706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perceiving others' perceptions of risk: still a task for Sisyphus.
    Finkel AM
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2008 Apr; 1128():121-37. PubMed ID: 18469220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Different formats for communicating surgical risks to patients and the effect on choice of treatment.
    Timmermans D; Molewijk B; Stiggelbout A; Kievit J
    Patient Educ Couns; 2004 Sep; 54(3):255-63. PubMed ID: 15324976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Risk perception and communication.
    Greenberg M; Lowrie K
    Risk Anal; 2009 Aug; 29(8):1059-60. PubMed ID: 19659546
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Health literacy and numeracy: key factors in cancer risk comprehension.
    Donelle L; Arocha JF; Hoffman-Goetz L
    Chronic Dis Can; 2008; 29(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 19036218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using plausible group sizes to communicate information about medical risks.
    Garcia-Retamero R; Galesic M
    Patient Educ Couns; 2011 Aug; 84(2):245-50. PubMed ID: 20728298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Numeracy and decision making.
    Peters E; Västfjäll D; Slovic P; Mertz CK; Mazzocco K; Dickert S
    Psychol Sci; 2006 May; 17(5):407-13. PubMed ID: 16683928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using a familiar risk comparison within a risk ladder to improve risk understanding by low numerates: a study of visual attention.
    Keller C
    Risk Anal; 2011 Jul; 31(7):1043-54. PubMed ID: 21284684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Risk communication, risk perception, and public health.
    Aakko E
    WMJ; 2004; 103(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 15101463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of risk ladder format on risk perception in high- and low-numerate individuals.
    Keller C; Siegrist M; Visschers V
    Risk Anal; 2009 Sep; 29(9):1255-64. PubMed ID: 19572963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Science, precaution, and the politics of technological risk: converging implications in evolutionary and social scientific perspectives.
    Stirling A
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2008 Apr; 1128():95-110. PubMed ID: 18469218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Management of transfusion related risks: is risk communication to non-experts at all possible?
    Hossenlopp C
    Dev Biol (Basel); 2007; 127():249-58. PubMed ID: 17486898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Risk perception, risk communication, and stakeholder involvement for biosolids management and research.
    Beecher N; Harrison E; Goldstein N; McDaniel M; Field P; Susskind L
    J Environ Qual; 2005; 34(1):122-8. PubMed ID: 15647541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.