These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18469211)

  • 1. Transparency in risk communication: graphical and analog tools.
    Kurz-Milcke E; Gigerenzer G; Martignon L
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2008 Apr; 1128():18-28. PubMed ID: 18469211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Presenting health risk information in different formats: the effect on participants' cognitive and emotional evaluation and decisions.
    Timmermans DR; Ockhuysen-Vermey CF; Henneman L
    Patient Educ Couns; 2008 Dec; 73(3):443-7. PubMed ID: 18722073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visualizing seismic risk and uncertainty: a review of related research.
    Bostrom A; Anselin L; Farris J
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2008 Apr; 1128():29-40. PubMed ID: 18469212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Communicating risk information: the influence of graphical display format on quantitative information perception-Accuracy, comprehension and preferences.
    Price M; Cameron R; Butow P
    Patient Educ Couns; 2007 Dec; 69(1-3):121-8. PubMed ID: 17905553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Numbers can be worth a thousand pictures: individual differences in understanding graphical and numerical representations of health-related information.
    Gaissmaier W; Wegwarth O; Skopec D; Müller AS; Broschinski S; Politi MC
    Health Psychol; 2012 May; 31(3):286-96. PubMed ID: 21842998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Probability information in risk communication: a review of the research literature.
    Visschers VH; Meertens RM; Passchier WW; de Vries NN
    Risk Anal; 2009 Feb; 29(2):267-87. PubMed ID: 19000070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Health literacy and cancer risk perception: implications for genomic risk communication.
    Brewer NT; Tzeng JP; Lillie SE; Edwards AS; Peppercorn JM; Rimer BK
    Med Decis Making; 2009; 29(2):157-66. PubMed ID: 19050227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Promoting transparency of long-term environmental decisions: the Hanford Decision Mapping System pilot project.
    Drew CH; Nyerges TL; Leschine TM
    Risk Anal; 2004 Dec; 24(6):1641-64. PubMed ID: 15660618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Numeracy and the perception and communication of risk.
    Peters E
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2008 Apr; 1128():1-7. PubMed ID: 18469208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Graphical approaches to the analysis of safety data from clinical trials.
    Amit O; Heiberger RM; Lane PW
    Pharm Stat; 2008; 7(1):20-35. PubMed ID: 17323410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Informed decision-making and colorectal cancer screening: is it occurring in primary care?
    Ling BS; Trauth JM; Fine MJ; Mor MK; Resnick A; Braddock CH; Bereknyei S; Weissfeld JL; Schoen RE; Ricci EM; Whittle J
    Med Care; 2008 Sep; 46(9 Suppl 1):S23-9. PubMed ID: 18725829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On representation of proteins by star-like graphs.
    Randić M; Zupan J; Vikić-Topić D
    J Mol Graph Model; 2007 Jul; 26(1):290-305. PubMed ID: 17223597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Risk communication and risky choice in context: ambiguity and ambivalence hypothesis.
    Wang XT
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2008 Apr; 1128():78-89. PubMed ID: 18469216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Helping Doctors and Patients Make Sense of Health Statistics.
    Gigerenzer G; Gaissmaier W; Kurz-Milcke E; Schwartz LM; Woloshin S
    Psychol Sci Public Interest; 2007 Nov; 8(2):53-96. PubMed ID: 26161749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Models and diagrams as thinking tools: the case of satellite-DNA.
    Suárez E
    Hist Philos Life Sci; 2007; 29(2):177-92. PubMed ID: 18564511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Visualization concepts to enhance quantitative decision making in drug development.
    Dykstra K; Pugh R; Krause A
    J Clin Pharmacol; 2010 Sep; 50(9 Suppl):130S-139S. PubMed ID: 20881226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Understanding the positive effects of graphical risk information on comprehension: measuring attention directed to written, tabular, and graphical risk information.
    Smerecnik CM; Mesters I; Kessels LT; Ruiter RA; De Vries NK; De Vries H
    Risk Anal; 2010 Sep; 30(9):1387-98. PubMed ID: 20561265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Is one picture worth a thousand words? Risk communication in primary care: advantages and shortcomings of different methods].
    Neuner-Jehle S; Wegwarth O; Steurer J
    Praxis (Bern 1994); 2008 Jun; 97(12):669-76. PubMed ID: 18661891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of long-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution on respiratory and cardiovascular mortality in the Netherlands: the NLCS-AIR study.
    Brunekreef B; Beelen R; Hoek G; Schouten L; Bausch-Goldbohm S; Fischer P; Armstrong B; Hughes E; Jerrett M; van den Brandt P
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2009 Mar; (139):5-71; discussion 73-89. PubMed ID: 19554969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.