BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

344 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18469397)

  • 1. Analyzing wet weather flow management using state of the art tools.
    Parker DS; Merlo RP; Jimenez JA; Wahlberg EJ
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(8):1247-51. PubMed ID: 18469397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Including the effects of filamentous bulking sludge during the simulation of wastewater treatment plants using a risk assessment model.
    Flores-Alsina X; Comas J; Rodriguez-Roda I; Gernaey KV; Rosen C
    Water Res; 2009 Oct; 43(18):4527-38. PubMed ID: 19695661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Implementation of CFD modeling in the performance assessment and optimization of secondary clarifiers: the PVSC case study.
    Xanthos S; Ramalingam K; Lipke S; McKenna B; Fillos J
    Water Sci Technol; 2013; 68(9):1901-13. PubMed ID: 24225088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sixty-five-year old final clarifier performance rivals that of modern designs.
    Barnard JL; Kunetz TE; Sobanski JP
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(8):1235-40. PubMed ID: 18469395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of sea water flushing on biological nitrification-denitrification activated sludge sewage treatment process.
    Yu SM; Leung WY; Ho KM; Greenfield PF; Eckenfelder WW
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 46(11-12):209-16. PubMed ID: 12523756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Marrying Step Feed with Secondary Clarifier Improvements to Significantly Increase Peak Wet Weather Treatment Capacity: An Integrated Methodology.
    Daigger GT; Siczka JS; Smith TF; Frank DA; McCorquodale JA
    Water Environ Res; 2017 Aug; 89(8):724-731. PubMed ID: 28332469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Increased performance of secondary clarifiers using dynamic distribution of minimum return sludge rates.
    Lynggaard-Jensen A; Andreasen P; Husum F; Nygaard M; Kaltoft J; Landgren L; Møller F; Brodersen E
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(9):2439-45. PubMed ID: 19901477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Model-based evaluation of nitrogen removal in a tannery wastewater treatment plant.
    Moussa MS; Rojas AR; Hooijmans CM; Gijzen HJ; van Loosdrecht MC
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(6):251-60. PubMed ID: 15537014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Two years of full-scale storm operation experience.
    Bixio D; Carrette R; Thoeye C
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 46(6-7):167-72. PubMed ID: 12380988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Conservation principles suspended solids distribution modelling to support ATS introduction on a recirculating WWTP.
    Gernaey KV; Nielsen MK; Thornberg D; Höök B; Munk-Nielsen T; Ingildsen P; Jørgensen SB
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(11):179-88. PubMed ID: 15685994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of sludge properties and hydraulic loading on the performance of secondary settling tanks--full-scale operational results.
    Vestner RJ; Günthert FW
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(7):179-86. PubMed ID: 15553474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Investigation of sludge re-circulating clarifiers design and optimization through numerical simulation.
    Davari S; Lichayee MJ
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 48(11-12):293-8. PubMed ID: 14753549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Calibration and simulation of two large wastewater treatment plants operated for nutrient removal.
    Ferrer J; Morenilla JJ; Bouzas A; García-Usach F
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(6):87-94. PubMed ID: 15536994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Benchmark simulation model no 2: general protocol and exploratory case studies.
    Jeppsson U; Pons MN; Nopens I; Alex J; Copp JB; Gernaey KV; Rosen C; Steyer JP; Vanrolleghem PA
    Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(8):67-78. PubMed ID: 17978434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Integrated design of sewers and wastewater treatment plants.
    Vollertsen J; Hvitved-Jacobsen T; Ujang Z; Talib SA
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 46(9):11-20. PubMed ID: 12448447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Aerobic granular sludge technology: an alternative to activated sludge?
    de Bruin LM; de Kreuk MK; van der Roest HF; Uijterlinde C; van Loosdrecht MC
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 49(11-12):1-7. PubMed ID: 15303716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Activated sludge wastewater treatment plants optimisation to face pollution overloads during grape harvest periods.
    Beck C; Prades G; Sadowski AG
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 15771102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. One-dimensional modelling of the secondary clarifier-factors affecting simulation in the clarification zone and the assessment of the thickening flow dependence.
    Plósz BG; Weiss M; Printemps C; Essemiani K; Meinhold J
    Water Res; 2007 Aug; 41(15):3359-71. PubMed ID: 17512029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A new one-dimensional clarifier model--verification using full-scale experimental data.
    De Clercq J; Devisscher M; Boonen I; Vanrolleghem PA; Defrancq J
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(12):105-12. PubMed ID: 12926676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Can a wastewater treatment plant be a powerplant? A case study.
    Schwarzenbeck N; Pfeiffer W; Bomball E
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(10):1555-61. PubMed ID: 18520012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.