BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18470756)

  • 1. Sample size calculations in thorough QT studies.
    Zhang L; Dmitrienko A; Luta G
    J Biopharm Stat; 2008; 18(3):468-82. PubMed ID: 18470756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Statistical issues including design and sample size calculation in thorough QT/QTc studies.
    Zhang J; Machado SG
    J Biopharm Stat; 2008; 18(3):451-67. PubMed ID: 18470755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sample size, power calculations, and their implications for the cost of thorough studies of drug induced QT interval prolongation.
    Malik M; Hnatkova K; Batchvarov V; Gang Y; Smetana P; Camm AJ
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2004 Dec; 27(12):1659-69. PubMed ID: 15613131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On power and sample size calculation for QT studies with recording replicates at given time point.
    Chow SC; Cheng B; Cosmatos D
    J Biopharm Stat; 2008; 18(3):483-93. PubMed ID: 18470757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Statistical assessment of QT/QTc prolongation based on maximum of correlated normal random variables.
    Cheng B; Chow SC; Burt D; Cosmatos D
    J Biopharm Stat; 2008; 18(3):494-501. PubMed ID: 18470758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. QT/QTc prolongation in placebo-treated subjects: a PhRMA collaborative data analysis.
    Agin MA; Aronstein WS; Ferber G; Geraldes MC; Locke C; Sager P
    J Biopharm Stat; 2008; 18(3):408-26. PubMed ID: 18470753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Statistical analysis methods for QT/QTc prolongation.
    Ma H; Smith B; Dmitrienko A
    J Biopharm Stat; 2008; 18(3):553-63. PubMed ID: 18470763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of baseline measurement on the change from baseline in QTc intervals.
    Tian H; Natarajan J
    J Biopharm Stat; 2008; 18(3):542-52. PubMed ID: 18470762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Statistical issues of QT prolongation assessment based on linear concentration modeling.
    Tsong Y; Shen M; Zhong J; Zhang J
    J Biopharm Stat; 2008; 18(3):564-84. PubMed ID: 18470764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Testing for positive control activity in a thorough QTc study.
    Zhang J
    J Biopharm Stat; 2008; 18(3):517-28. PubMed ID: 18470760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A statistical assessment of QT data following placebo and moxifloxacin dosing in thorough QT studies.
    Stylianou A; Roger J; Stephens K
    J Biopharm Stat; 2008; 18(3):502-16. PubMed ID: 18470759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Guest editors' notes on statistical issues in design and analysis of thorough QTc studies.
    Tsong Y; Zhang J
    J Biopharm Stat; 2008; 18(3):405-7. PubMed ID: 18470752
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sample size calculation for thorough QT/QTc study considering various factors related to multiple time points.
    Meng Z; Kringle R; Chen X; Zhao PL
    J Biopharm Stat; 2010 May; 20(3):563-77. PubMed ID: 20358436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of number of replicate electrocardiograms recorded at each time point in a thorough QT study on sample size and study cost.
    Natekar M; Hingorani P; Gupta P; Karnad DR; Kothari S; de Vries M; Zumbrunnen T; Narula D
    J Clin Pharmacol; 2011 Jun; 51(6):908-14. PubMed ID: 20852005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measuring the effects of supratherapeutic doses of levofloxacin on healthy volunteers using four methods of QT correction and periodic and continuous ECG recordings.
    Noel GJ; Goodman DB; Chien S; Solanki B; Padmanabhan M; Natarajan J
    J Clin Pharmacol; 2004 May; 44(5):464-73. PubMed ID: 15102866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validation testing in thorough QT/QTc clinical trials.
    Tsong Y; Zhong J; Chen WJ
    J Biopharm Stat; 2008; 18(3):529-41. PubMed ID: 18470761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of six commonly used QT correction models and their parameter estimation methods.
    Wang D; Taubel J; Arezina R
    J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(6):1148-61. PubMed ID: 23075014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bias and variance evaluation of QT interval correction methods.
    Wang Y; Pan G; Balch A
    J Biopharm Stat; 2008; 18(3):427-50. PubMed ID: 18470754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The joint modeling of drug and positive control effects to estimate sample size and power in crossover "thorough" QT/QTc studies.
    Hosmane B; Locke C; Chiu YL
    J Biopharm Stat; 2013; 23(4):871-80. PubMed ID: 23786591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of baseline ECG collection on the planning, analysis and interpretation of 'thorough' QT trials.
    Sethuraman V; Sun Q
    Pharm Stat; 2009; 8(2):113-24. PubMed ID: 18481273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.