BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18470920)

  • 1. The roles of surface chemistry and topography in the strength and rate of osseointegration of titanium implants in bone.
    Sul YT; Kang BS; Johansson C; Um HS; Park CJ; Albrektsson T
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2009 Jun; 89(4):942-50. PubMed ID: 18470920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optimum surface properties of oxidized implants for reinforcement of osseointegration: surface chemistry, oxide thickness, porosity, roughness, and crystal structure.
    Sul YT; Johansson C; Wennerberg A; Cho LR; Chang BS; Albrektsson T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(3):349-59. PubMed ID: 15973946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The bone response of oxidized bioactive and non-bioactive titanium implants.
    Sul YT; Johansson C; Byon E; Albrektsson T
    Biomaterials; 2005 Nov; 26(33):6720-30. PubMed ID: 15975649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A 1-year follow-up of implants of differing surface roughness placed in rabbit bone.
    Wennerberg A; Ektessabi A; Albrektsson T; Johansson C; Andersson B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(4):486-94. PubMed ID: 9274077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Oxidized, bioactive implants are rapidly and strongly integrated in bone. Part 1--experimental implants.
    Sul YT; Jeong Y; Johansson C; Albrektsson T
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17(5):521-6. PubMed ID: 16958691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A histomorphometric analysis of the effects of various surface treatment methods on osseointegration.
    Kim YH; Koak JY; Chang IT; Wennerberg A; Heo SJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):349-56. PubMed ID: 12814309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Oxidized titanium screws coated with calcium ions and their performance in rabbit bone.
    Sul YT; Johansson CB; Albrektsson T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(5):625-34. PubMed ID: 12381062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Experimental evidence for interfacial biochemical bonding in osseointegrated titanium implants.
    Sul YT; Kwon DH; Kang BS; Oh SJ; Johansson C
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24 Suppl A100():8-19. PubMed ID: 22093014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The removal of Al2O3 particles from grit-blasted titanium implant surfaces: effects on biocompatibility, osseointegration and interface strength in vivo.
    Rüger M; Gensior TJ; Herren C; von Walter M; Ocklenburg C; Marx R; Erli HJ
    Acta Biomater; 2010 Jul; 6(7):2852-61. PubMed ID: 20080212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bone tissue response to commercially pure titanium implants blasted with fine and coarse particles of aluminum oxide.
    Wennerberg A; Albrektsson T; Andersson B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 8820121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biology of grit-blasted titanium alloy implants.
    Goldberg VM; Stevenson S; Feighan J; Davy D
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1995 Oct; (319):122-9. PubMed ID: 7554621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of ion beam-assisted deposition of hydroxyapatite on the grit-blasted surface of endosseous implants in rabbit tibiae.
    Park YS; Yi KY; Lee IS; Han CH; Jung YC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 15747671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of chemical and nanotopographical modifications on the early stages of osseointegration.
    Meirelles L; Currie F; Jacobsson M; Albrektsson T; Wennerberg A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):641-7. PubMed ID: 18807559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of a novel calcium titanate coating on the osseointegration of blasted endosseous implants in rabbit tibiae.
    Suh JY; Jeung OC; Choi BJ; Park JW
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Jun; 18(3):362-9. PubMed ID: 17298490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Osseointegration of two different phosphate ion-containing titanium oxide surfaces in rabbit cancellous bone.
    Park JW
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24 Suppl A100():145-51. PubMed ID: 22251085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improved retention and bone-tolmplant contact with fluoride-modified titanium implants.
    Ellingsen JE; Johansson CB; Wennerberg A; Holmén A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(5):659-66. PubMed ID: 15508981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluations of bone tissue integration to pure and alloyed titanium implants.
    Stenport VF; Johansson CB
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 Sep; 10(3):191-9. PubMed ID: 18241219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of a cell adhesion molecule coating on the blasted surface of titanium implants on bone healing in the rabbit femur.
    Park JW; Lee SG; Choi BJ; Suh JY
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):533-41. PubMed ID: 17929513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Removal torque and histomorphometric investigation of 4 different titanium surfaces: an experimental study in the rabbit tibia.
    Cordioli G; Majzoub Z; Piattelli A; Scarano A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(5):668-74. PubMed ID: 11055134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of ion beam-assisted deposition of hydroxyapatite on the osseointegration of endosseous implants in rabbit tibiae.
    Jung YC; Han CH; Lee IS; Kim HE
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(6):809-18. PubMed ID: 11769831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.