272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18470920)
21. Anchorage of titanium implants with different surface characteristics: an experimental study in rabbits.
Gotfredsen K; Berglundh T; Lindhe J
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2000; 2(3):120-8. PubMed ID: 11359256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Histomorphometric analysis of the osseointegration of four different implant surfaces in the femoral epiphyses of rabbits.
Le Guehennec L; Goyenvalle E; Lopez-Heredia MA; Weiss P; Amouriq Y; Layrolle P
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Nov; 19(11):1103-10. PubMed ID: 18983312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Evaluation of a predictive model for implant surface topography effects on early osseointegration in the rat tibia model.
Abron A; Hopfensperger M; Thompson J; Cooper LF
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jan; 85(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 11174677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Does surface anodisation of titanium implants change osseointegration and make their extraction from bone any easier?
Langhoff JD; Mayer J; Faber L; Kaestner SB; Guibert G; Zlinszky K; Auer JA; von Rechenberg B
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2008; 21(3):202-10. PubMed ID: 18536845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Osseointegration of anodized titanium implants under different current voltages: a rabbit study.
Park KH; Heo SJ; Koak JY; Kim SK; Lee JB; Kim SH; Lim YJ
J Oral Rehabil; 2007 Jul; 34(7):517-27. PubMed ID: 17559620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Importance of Ca(2+) modifications for osseointegration of smooth and moderately rough anodized titanium implants - a removal torque and histological evaluation in rabbit.
Fröjd V; Wennerberg A; Franke Stenport V
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Oct; 14(5):737-45. PubMed ID: 20977616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Biological responses of anodized titanium implants under different current voltages.
Choi JW; Heo SJ; Koak JY; Kim SK; Lim YJ; Kim SH; Lee JB
J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Dec; 33(12):889-97. PubMed ID: 17168931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Resonance frequency measurements in vivo and related surface properties of magnesium-incorporated, micropatterned and magnesium-incorporated TiUnite, Osseotite, SLA and TiOblast implants.
Sul YT; Jönsson J; Yoon GS; Johansson C
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Oct; 20(10):1146-55. PubMed ID: 19719742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparative histomorphometry and resonance frequency analysis of implants with moderately rough surfaces in a loaded animal model.
Al-Nawas B; Groetz KA; Goetz H; Duschner H; Wagner W
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jan; 19(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 17944964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. An in vitro and in vivo evaluation of bioactive titanium implants following sodium removal treatment.
Fawzy AS; Amer MA
Dent Mater; 2009 Jan; 25(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 18585776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The removal torque of titanium implant inserted in rabbit femur coated with biomimetic deposited Ca-P coating.
Fuming H; Guoli Y; Xiaoxiang W; Shifang Z
J Oral Rehabil; 2008 Oct; 35(10):754-65. PubMed ID: 18466279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Enhanced osteoconductivity of micro-structured titanium implants (XiVE S CELLplus) by addition of surface calcium chemistry: a histomorphometric study in the rabbit femur.
Park JW; Kim HK; Kim YJ; An CH; Hanawa T
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jul; 20(7):684-90. PubMed ID: 19489932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Histomorphometric, ultrastructural and microhardness evaluation of the osseointegration of a nanostructured titanium oxide coating by metal-organic chemical vapour deposition: an in vivo study.
Giavaresi G; Ambrosio L; Battiston GA; Casellato U; Gerbasi R; Finia M; Aldini NN; Martini L; Rimondini L; Giardino R
Biomaterials; 2004 Nov; 25(25):5583-91. PubMed ID: 15159074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Covalently-linked hyaluronan promotes bone formation around Ti implants in a rabbit model.
Morra M; Cassinelli C; Cascardo G; Fini M; Giavaresi G; Giardino R
J Orthop Res; 2009 May; 27(5):657-63. PubMed ID: 18991337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Surface-modified zirconia implants: tissue response in rabbits.
Rocchietta I; Fontana F; Addis A; Schupbach P; Simion M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Aug; 20(8):844-50. PubMed ID: 19604281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Anchorage of TiO2-blasted, HA-coated, and machined implants: an experimental study with rabbits.
Gotfredsen K; Wennerberg A; Johansson C; Skovgaard LT; Hjørting-Hansen E
J Biomed Mater Res; 1995 Oct; 29(10):1223-31. PubMed ID: 8557724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Increased bone contact to a calcium-incorporated oxidized commercially pure titanium implant: an in-vivo study in rabbits.
Fröjd V; Franke-Stenport V; Meirelles L; Wennerberg A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jun; 37(6):561-6. PubMed ID: 18346880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Early bone tissue responses to turned and oxidized implants in the rabbit tibia.
Burgos PM; Rasmusson L; Meirelles L; Sennerby L
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 Sep; 10(3):181-90. PubMed ID: 18218052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Bone responses to titanium implants surface-roughened by sandblasted and double etched treatments in a rabbit model.
Yang GL; He FM; Yang XF; Wang XX; Zhao SF
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Oct; 106(4):516-24. PubMed ID: 18602288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The effect of hydrofluoric acid treatment on titanium implant osseointegration in ovariectomized rats.
Li Y; Zou S; Wang D; Feng G; Bao C; Hu J
Biomaterials; 2010 Apr; 31(12):3266-73. PubMed ID: 20132983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
