272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18470920)
41. A study on the effect of dual blasting with TiO2 on titanium implant surfaces on functional attachment in bone.
Rønold HJ; Lyngstadaas SP; Ellingsen JE
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2003 Nov; 67(2):524-30. PubMed ID: 14566794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Surface-etching enhances titanium implant osseointegration in newly formed (rhBMP-2-induced) and native bone.
Qahash M; Hardwick WR; Rohrer MD; Wozney JM; Wikesjö UM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(3):472-7. PubMed ID: 17622015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Fluoride modification effects on osteoblast behavior and bone formation at TiO2 grit-blasted c.p. titanium endosseous implants.
Cooper LF; Zhou Y; Takebe J; Guo J; Abron A; Holmén A; Ellingsen JE
Biomaterials; 2006 Feb; 27(6):926-36. PubMed ID: 16112191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Biomechanical, histological, and ultrastructural analyses of laser micro- and nano-structured titanium alloy implants: a study in rabbit.
Palmquist A; Lindberg F; Emanuelsson L; Brånemark R; Engqvist H; Thomsen P
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2010 Mar; 92(4):1476-86. PubMed ID: 19425049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Biological performance of chemical hydroxyapatite coating associated with implant surface modification by laser beam: biomechanical study in rabbit tibias.
Faeda RS; Tavares HS; Sartori R; Guastaldi AC; Marcantonio E
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1706-15. PubMed ID: 19615586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Effect of surface finish on the osseointegration of laser-treated titanium alloy implants.
Götz HE; Müller M; Emmel A; Holzwarth U; Erben RG; Stangl R
Biomaterials; 2004 Aug; 25(18):4057-64. PubMed ID: 15046896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Histometric evaluation of bone around titanium implants with different surface treatments in rats exposed to cigarette smoke inhalation.
Correa MG; Gomes Campos ML; César-Neto JB; Casati MZ; Nociti FH; Sallum EA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jun; 20(6):588-93. PubMed ID: 19302391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. The relative effect of surface strontium chemistry and super-hydrophilicity on the early osseointegration of moderately rough titanium surface in the rabbit femur.
Park JW; Kwon TG; Suh JY
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Jun; 24(6):706-9. PubMed ID: 22409778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. A quantitative comparison of machined commercially pure titanium and titanium-aluminum-vanadium implants in rabbit bone.
Johansson CB; Han CH; Wennerberg A; Albrektsson T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(3):315-21. PubMed ID: 9638001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Influence of pores created by laser superfinishing on osseointegration of titanium alloy implants.
Stangl R; Pries A; Loos B; Müller M; Erben RG
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2004 Jun; 69(3):444-53. PubMed ID: 15127391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Effect of hydroxyapatite and titania nanostructures on early in vivo bone response.
Meirelles L; Melin L; Peltola T; Kjellin P; Kangasniemi I; Currie F; Andersson M; Albrektsson T; Wennerberg A
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 Dec; 10(4):245-54. PubMed ID: 18384406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Biomechanical measurements of calcium-incorporated oxidized implants in rabbit bone: effect of calcium surface chemistry of a novel implant.
Sul YT; Byon ES; Jeong Y
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2004; 6(2):101-10. PubMed ID: 15669710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Histologic and histomorphometric analysis of the bone response to machined and sandblasted titanium implants: an experimental study in rabbits.
Piattelli A; Manzon L; Scarano A; Paolantonio M; Piattelli M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(6):805-10. PubMed ID: 9857591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Chronological changes in the ultrastructure of titanium-bone interfaces: analysis by light microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, and micro-computed tomography.
Morinaga K; Kido H; Sato A; Watazu A; Matsuura M
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Mar; 11(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 18384402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. A removal torque and histomorphometric study of bone tissue reactions to commercially pure titanium and Vitallium implants.
Johansson CB; Sennerby L; Albrektsson T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1991; 6(4):437-41. PubMed ID: 1820312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Histomorphometric evaluation of alumina-blasted/acid-etched and thin ion beam-deposited bioceramic surfaces: an experimental study in dogs.
Suzuki M; Guimaraes MV; Marin C; Granato R; Gil JN; Coelho PG
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Mar; 67(3):602-7. PubMed ID: 19231787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Effects of biomimetically and electrochemically deposited nano-hydroxyapatite coatings on osseointegration of porous titanium implants.
Yang GL; He FM; Hu JA; Wang XX; Zhao SF
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Jun; 107(6):782-9. PubMed ID: 19201624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. The influence of surface-blasting on the incorporation of titanium-alloy implants in a rabbit intramedullary model.
Feighan JE; Goldberg VM; Davy D; Parr JA; Stevenson S
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1995 Sep; 77(9):1380-95. PubMed ID: 7673290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Secondary stability assessment of titanium implants with an alkali-etched surface: a resonance frequency analysis study in beagle dogs.
Strnad J; Urban K; Povysil C; Strnad Z
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(3):502-12. PubMed ID: 18700375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Improvement of osseointegration of titanium dental implant surfaces modified with CO ions: a comparative histomorphometric study in beagle dogs.
De Maeztu MA; Braceras I; Alava JI; Gay-Escoda C
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 May; 37(5):441-7. PubMed ID: 18339518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
