These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

580 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18471656)

  • 1. Systematic reviews can be produced and published faster.
    Sampson M; Shojania KG; Garritty C; Horsley T; Ocampo M; Moher D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Jun; 61(6):531-6. PubMed ID: 18471656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Handsearching for randomized controlled clinical trials in German medical journals].
    Blümle A; Antes G
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Feb; 133(6):230-4. PubMed ID: 18236347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Taking advantage of the explosion of systematic reviews: an efficient MEDLINE search strategy.
    Shojania KG; Bero LA
    Eff Clin Pract; 2001; 4(4):157-62. PubMed ID: 11525102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The quality of reports of critical care meta-analyses in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: an independent appraisal.
    Delaney A; Bagshaw SM; Ferland A; Laupland K; Manns B; Doig C
    Crit Care Med; 2007 Feb; 35(2):589-94. PubMed ID: 17205029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating the quality of systematic reviews in the emergency medicine literature.
    Kelly KD; Travers A; Dorgan M; Slater L; Rowe BH
    Ann Emerg Med; 2001 Nov; 38(5):518-26. PubMed ID: 11679863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sources of evidence for systematic reviews of interventions in diabetes.
    Royle PL; Bain L; Waugh NR
    Diabet Med; 2005 Oct; 22(10):1386-93. PubMed ID: 16176201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Increased number of systematic reviews in the Netherlands in the period 1991-2000].
    Grootens KP; Assendelft WJ; Overbeke AJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2003 Nov; 147(45):2226-30. PubMed ID: 14640061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cochrane reviews used more rigorous methods than non-Cochrane reviews: survey of systematic reviews in physiotherapy.
    Moseley AM; Elkins MR; Herbert RD; Maher CG; Sherrington C
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Oct; 62(10):1021-30. PubMed ID: 19282144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Surveillance search techniques identified the need to update systematic reviews.
    Sampson M; Shojania KG; McGowan J; Daniel R; Rader T; Iansavichene AE; Ji J; Ansari MT; Moher D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Aug; 61(8):755-62. PubMed ID: 18586179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of the methodological quality of systematic reviews published in the urological literature from 1998 to 2008.
    MacDonald SL; Canfield SE; Fesperman SF; Dahm P
    J Urol; 2010 Aug; 184(2):648-53. PubMed ID: 20639030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Time relevance, citation of reporting guidelines, and breadth of literature search in systematic reviews in orthodontics.
    Livas C; Pandis N; Ren Y
    Eur J Orthod; 2015 Apr; 37(2):183-7. PubMed ID: 25052374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An analysis of review articles published in four anaesthesia journals.
    Smith AF
    Can J Anaesth; 1997 Apr; 44(4):405-9. PubMed ID: 9104524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Search and selection methodology of systematic reviews in orthodontics (2000-2004).
    Flores-Mir C; Major MP; Major PW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Aug; 130(2):214-7. PubMed ID: 16905066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A method for defining a journal subset for a clinical discipline using the bibliographies of systematic reviews.
    Wilczynski NL; Garg AX; Haynes B;
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2007; 129(Pt 1):721-4. PubMed ID: 17911811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study of location and citation counts.
    Montori VM; Wilczynski NL; Morgan D; Haynes RB;
    BMC Med; 2003 Nov; 1():2. PubMed ID: 14633274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. No consensus exists on search reporting methods for systematic reviews.
    Sampson M; McGowan J; Tetzlaff J; Cogo E; Moher D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Aug; 61(8):748-54. PubMed ID: 18586178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Randomised controlled trial to meta-analysis ratio: a reply from a group producing systematic reviews.
    Weir R; Bidwell S
    N Z Med J; 2007 Nov; 120(1266):U2843. PubMed ID: 18264210
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. It's in your hands: the value of handsearching in conducting systematic reviews of public health interventions.
    Armstrong R; Jackson N; Doyle J; Waters E; Howes F
    J Public Health (Oxf); 2005 Dec; 27(4):388-91. PubMed ID: 16311247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Errors in search strategies were identified by type and frequency.
    Sampson M; McGowan J
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Oct; 59(10):1057-63. PubMed ID: 16980145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electronic publication and the narrowing of science and scholarship.
    Evans JA
    Science; 2008 Jul; 321(5887):395-9. PubMed ID: 18635800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 29.