These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
564 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18471656)
21. [Hand searching for controlled clinical trials in German surgical journals. A contribution to evidence-based surgery]. Blümle A; Antes G; Diener MK Chirurg; 2007 Nov; 78(11):1052-7. PubMed ID: 17622501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The search and selection for primary studies in systematic reviews published in dental journals indexed in MEDLINE was not fully reproducible. Faggion CM; Huivin R; Aranda L; Pandis N; Alarcon M J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Jun; 98():53-61. PubMed ID: 29476922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Are studies reporting significant results more likely to be published? Koletsi D; Karagianni A; Pandis N; Makou M; Polychronopoulou A; Eliades T Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Nov; 136(5):632.e1-5; discussion 632-3. PubMed ID: 19892276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Systematic reviews involving complementary and alternative medicine interventions had higher quality of reporting than conventional medicine reviews. Lawson ML; Pham B; Klassen TP; Moher D J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Aug; 58(8):777-84. PubMed ID: 16018912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Investing in updating: how do conclusions change when Cochrane systematic reviews are updated? French SD; McDonald S; McKenzie JE; Green SE BMC Med Res Methodol; 2005 Oct; 5():33. PubMed ID: 16225692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [The impact of the annual scientific meetings of the Israel Society of Rheumatology as measured by publication rates of the abstracts in peer-reviewed journals]. Perez S; Hashkes PJ; Uziel Y Harefuah; 2004 Apr; 143(4):266-9, 319. PubMed ID: 15116582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Quality assessment of observational studies is not commonplace in systematic reviews. Mallen C; Peat G; Croft P J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Aug; 59(8):765-9. PubMed ID: 16828667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Systematic reviews for evidence-based management: how to find them and what to do with them. Chan KS; Morton SC; Shekelle PG Am J Manag Care; 2004 Nov; 10(11 Pt 1):806-12. PubMed ID: 15623270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Searching for unpublished trials in Cochrane reviews may not be worth the effort. van Driel ML; De Sutter A; De Maeseneer J; Christiaens T J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Aug; 62(8):838-844.e3. PubMed ID: 19128939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies. Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. An international survey indicated that unpublished systematic reviews exist. Tricco AC; Pham B; Brehaut J; Tetroe J; Cappelli M; Hopewell S; Lavis JN; Berlin JA; Moher D J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jun; 62(6):617-623.e5. PubMed ID: 19162440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Publication rate of abstracts from the annual ASTRO meeting: comparison with other organizations. Papagikos MA; Rossi PJ; Lee WR J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Jan; 2(1):72-5. PubMed ID: 17411764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Publications indexed in Medline and Embase originating from the Syrian Arab Republic: a survey. Matar HE; Almerie MQ; Adams CE; Essali A East Mediterr Health J; 2009; 15(3):648-52. PubMed ID: 19731781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Ensuring inclusion of research reports in systematic reviews. Dijkers MP Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2009 Nov; 90(11 Suppl):S60-9. PubMed ID: 19892076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. An encouraging assessment of methods to inform priorities for updating systematic reviews. Sutton AJ; Donegan S; Takwoingi Y; Garner P; Gamble C; Donald A J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Mar; 62(3):241-51. PubMed ID: 18783919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Cochrane Skin Group systematic reviews are more methodologically rigorous than other systematic reviews in dermatology. Collier A; Heilig L; Schilling L; Williams H; Dellavalle RP Br J Dermatol; 2006 Dec; 155(6):1230-5. PubMed ID: 17107394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses: an illustrated, step-by-step guide. Pai M; McCulloch M; Gorman JD; Pai N; Enanoria W; Kennedy G; Tharyan P; Colford JM Natl Med J India; 2004; 17(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 15141602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A comparison of authors publishing in two groups of U.S. medical journals. Weller AC Bull Med Libr Assoc; 1996 Jul; 84(3):359-66. PubMed ID: 8883984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. An alternative to the hand searching gold standard: validating methodological search filters using relative recall. Sampson M; Zhang L; Morrison A; Barrowman NJ; Clifford TJ; Platt RW; Klassen TP; Moher D BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Jul; 6():33. PubMed ID: 16848895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. An investigation of the contents of complementary and alternative medicine journals. Coelho HF; Pittler MH; Ernst E Altern Ther Health Med; 2007; 13(4):40-4. PubMed ID: 17658121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]