These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18471795)

  • 41. When a high-intensity "distractor" is better then a low-intensity one: modeling the effect of an auditory or tactile nontarget stimulus on visual saccadic reaction time.
    Diederich A; Colonius H
    Brain Res; 2008 Nov; 1242():219-30. PubMed ID: 18573240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Functional specialization and convergence in the occipito-temporal cortex supporting haptic and visual identification of human faces and body parts: an fMRI study.
    Kitada R; Johnsrude IS; Kochiyama T; Lederman SJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Oct; 21(10):2027-45. PubMed ID: 18823255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Why is visual search superior in autism spectrum disorder?
    Joseph RM; Keehn B; Connolly C; Wolfe JM; Horowitz TS
    Dev Sci; 2009 Nov; 12(6):1083-96. PubMed ID: 19840062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Preattentive and focal attentional processes in schizophrenia: a visual search study.
    Mori S; Tanaka G; Ayaka Y; Michitsuji S; Niwa H; Uemura M; Ohta Y
    Schizophr Res; 1996 Oct; 22(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 8908692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Manual asymmetries in the temporal and spatial control of aimed movements.
    van Doorn RR
    Hum Mov Sci; 2008 Aug; 27(4):551-76. PubMed ID: 18639362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Missed targets are more frequent than false alarms: a model for error rates in visual search.
    Zenger B; Fahle M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1997 Dec; 23(6):1783-91. PubMed ID: 9425680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Practise strengthens haptic capture.
    Misceo GF; Plankinton BW
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2009 Jun; 63(2):113-23. PubMed ID: 19485602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. No age differences in complex memory search: older adults search as efficiently as younger adults.
    Lange EB; Verhaeghen P
    Psychol Aging; 2009 Mar; 24(1):105-15. PubMed ID: 19290742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Serial and parallel attentive visual searches: evidence from cumulative distribution functions of response times.
    Sung K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Dec; 34(6):1372-88. PubMed ID: 19045981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The spatial distribution of inhibition in preview search.
    Osugi T; Kumada T; Kawahara J
    Vision Res; 2009 Mar; 49(8):851-61. PubMed ID: 19275913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Target Search and Inspection Strategies in Haptic Search.
    Metzger A; Toscani M; Valsecchi M; Drewing K
    IEEE Trans Haptics; 2021; 14(4):804-815. PubMed ID: 33929965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Attentional capture by a salient distractor in visual search: the effect of target-distractor similarity.
    Poiese P; Spalek TM; Di Lollo V
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2008 Dec; 62(4):233-6. PubMed ID: 19071990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Haptic selective attention by foot and by hand.
    Hajnal A; Fonseca S; Kinsella-Shaw JM; Silva P; Carello C; Turvey MT
    Neurosci Lett; 2007 May; 419(1):5-9. PubMed ID: 17433544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Combining eye and hand in search is suboptimal.
    Liesker H; Brenner E; Smeets JB
    Exp Brain Res; 2009 Aug; 197(4):395-401. PubMed ID: 19590859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. What drives memory-driven attentional capture? The effects of memory type, display type, and search type.
    Olivers CN
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1275-91. PubMed ID: 19803636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Feature integration theory revisited: dissociating feature detection and attentional guidance in visual search.
    Chan LK; Hayward WG
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Feb; 35(1):119-32. PubMed ID: 19170475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Visual search disorders beyond pure sensory failure in patients with acute homonymous visual field defects.
    Machner B; Sprenger A; Kömpf D; Sander T; Heide W; Kimmig H; Helmchen C
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Nov; 47(13):2704-11. PubMed ID: 19500605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Tactile feedback exceeds visual feedback to display tissue slippage in a laparoscopic grasper.
    Westebring-van der Putten EP; Lysen WW; Henssen VD; Koopmans N; Goossens RH; van den Dobbelsteen JJ; Dankelman J; Jakimowcz J
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2009; 142():420-5. PubMed ID: 19377198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Do the contents of working memory capture attention? Yes, but cognitive control matters.
    Han SW; Kim MS
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1292-302. PubMed ID: 19803637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Integration and disruption effects of shape and texture in haptic search.
    van Polanen V; Bergmann Tiest WM; Kappers AM
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(7):e70255. PubMed ID: 23894626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.