BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

38 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18472112)

  • 1. BCD Beam Search: considering suboptimal partial solutions in Bad Clade Deletion supertrees.
    Fleischauer M; Böcker S
    PeerJ; 2018; 6():e4987. PubMed ID: 29900080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The supertree tool kit.
    Davis KE; Hill J
    BMC Res Notes; 2010 Apr; 3():95. PubMed ID: 20377857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Polynomial supertree methods revisited.
    Brinkmeyer M; Griebel T; Böcker S
    Adv Bioinformatics; 2011; 2011():524182. PubMed ID: 22229028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Constructing majority-rule supertrees.
    Dong J; Fernández-Baca D; McMorris FR
    Algorithms Mol Biol; 2010 Jan; 5():2. PubMed ID: 20047658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Characterizing gene family evolution.
    Liberles DA; Dittmar K
    Biol Proced Online; 2008 Jun; 10():66-73. PubMed ID: 19461954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A maximum pseudo-likelihood approach for estimating species trees under the coalescent model.
    Liu L; Yu L; Edwards SV
    BMC Evol Biol; 2010 Oct; 10():302. PubMed ID: 20937096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Robinson-Foulds supertrees.
    Bansal MS; Burleigh JG; Eulenstein O; Fernández-Baca D
    Algorithms Mol Biol; 2010 Feb; 5():18. PubMed ID: 20181274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Coalescent methods for estimating phylogenetic trees.
    Liu L; Yu L; Kubatko L; Pearl DK; Edwards SV
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2009 Oct; 53(1):320-8. PubMed ID: 19501178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Contemporary concepts of homology in biology (a theoretical review)].
    Pavlinov IIa
    Zh Obshch Biol; 2011; 72(4):298-319. PubMed ID: 21954630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Explosions and hot spots in supertree methods.
    Day WH; McMorris FR; Wilkinson M
    J Theor Biol; 2008 Jul; 253(2):345-8. PubMed ID: 18472112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Supertree construction in the genomic age.
    Bininda-Emonds OR
    Methods Enzymol; 2005; 395():745-57. PubMed ID: 15865993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Constructing rooted supertrees using distances.
    Willson SJ
    Bull Math Biol; 2004 Nov; 66(6):1755-83. PubMed ID: 15522354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Performance of flip supertree construction with a heuristic algorithm.
    Eulenstein O; Chen D; Burleigh JG; Fernández-Baca D; Sanderson MJ
    Syst Biol; 2004 Apr; 53(2):299-308. PubMed ID: 15205054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. PhySIC: a veto supertree method with desirable properties.
    Ranwez V; Berry V; Criscuolo A; Fabre PH; Guillemot S; Scornavacca C; Douzery EJ
    Syst Biol; 2007 Oct; 56(5):798-817. PubMed ID: 17918032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 2.