These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18472568)

  • 1. [Study of brain mechanisms in error detection during deceptive responses in the normal state and under the influence of alcohol].
    Kireev MV; Pakhomov SV; Medvedev SV
    Fiziol Cheloveka; 2008; 34(2):13-22. PubMed ID: 18472568
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The contribution of executive processes to deceptive responding.
    Johnson R; Barnhardt J; Zhu J
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(7):878-901. PubMed ID: 14998703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Differential effects of practice on the executive processes used for truthful and deceptive responses: an event-related brain potential study.
    Johnson R; Barnhardt J; Zhu J
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 24(3):386-404. PubMed ID: 16099352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An event-related potential study of deception to self preferences.
    Tu S; Li H; Jou J; Zhang Q; Wang T; Yu C; Qiu J
    Brain Res; 2009 Jan; 1247():142-8. PubMed ID: 18952072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The self in conflict: the role of executive processes during truthful and deceptive responses about attitudes.
    Johnson R; Henkell H; Simon E; Zhu J
    Neuroimage; 2008 Jan; 39(1):469-82. PubMed ID: 17919934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Lie-specific involvement of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in deception.
    Priori A; Mameli F; Cogiamanian F; Marceglia S; Tiriticco M; Mrakic-Sposta S; Ferrucci R; Zago S; Polezzi D; Sartori G
    Cereb Cortex; 2008 Feb; 18(2):451-5. PubMed ID: 17584853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does willingness affect the N2-P3 effect of deceptive and honest responses?
    Wu H; Hu X; Fu G
    Neurosci Lett; 2009 Dec; 467(2):63-6. PubMed ID: 19818837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Neurocognitive mechanisms underlying deceptive hazard evaluation: An event-related potentials investigation.
    Fu H; Qiu W; Ma H; Ma Q
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0182892. PubMed ID: 28793344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The processes leading to deception: ERP spatiotemporal principal component analysis and source analysis.
    Sun SY; Mai X; Liu C; Liu JY; Luo YJ
    Soc Neurosci; 2011; 6(4):348-59. PubMed ID: 21225491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A truth that's told with bad intent: an ERP study of deception.
    Carrión RE; Keenan JP; Sebanz N
    Cognition; 2010 Jan; 114(1):105-10. PubMed ID: 19836013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lying in the scanner: covert countermeasures disrupt deception detection by functional magnetic resonance imaging.
    Ganis G; Rosenfeld JP; Meixner J; Kievit RA; Schendan HE
    Neuroimage; 2011 Mar; 55(1):312-9. PubMed ID: 21111834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The production and detection of deception in an interactive game.
    Sip KE; Lynge M; Wallentin M; McGregor WB; Frith CD; Roepstorff A
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Oct; 48(12):3619-26. PubMed ID: 20727906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Error positivity is related to attentional control of task switching.
    Tanaka H
    Neuroreport; 2009 May; 20(8):820-4. PubMed ID: 19384255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The brain regulation mechanism of error monitoring in impulsive children with ADHD--an analysis of error related potentials.
    Zhang JS; Wang Y; Cai RG; Yan CH
    Neurosci Lett; 2009 Aug; 460(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 19450665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Telling truth from lie in individual subjects with fast event-related fMRI.
    Langleben DD; Loughead JW; Bilker WB; Ruparel K; Childress AR; Busch SI; Gur RC
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2005 Dec; 26(4):262-72. PubMed ID: 16161128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Limitations to the detection of deception: true and false recollections are poorly distinguished using an event-related potential procedure.
    Allen JJ; Mertens R
    Soc Neurosci; 2009; 4(6):473-90. PubMed ID: 18633842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Stages of the cerebral mechanisms of deceptive responses].
    Kireev MV; Starchenko MG; Pakhomov SV; Medvedev SV
    Fiziol Cheloveka; 2007; 33(6):5-13. PubMed ID: 18265567
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Acoustically evoked brain stem potentials in acute alcoholic intoxication].
    Klemm B; Haas W
    Psychiatr Neurol Med Psychol (Leipz); 1990 Feb; 42(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 2326375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Neuronal organization of the stages in decision making. I. A case of decision making evoked by a single information stimulus].
    Kropotov IuD; Ponomarev VA
    Fiziol Cheloveka; 1988; 14(3):378-86. PubMed ID: 3169426
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hemispheric asymmetry and deception detection.
    Malcolm S; Paul Keenan J
    Laterality; 2005 Mar; 10(2):103-10. PubMed ID: 15849029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.