These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18474094)

  • 1. Bayes rules for optimally using Bayesian hierarchical regression models in provider profiling to identify high-mortality hospitals.
    Austin PC
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2008 May; 8():30. PubMed ID: 18474094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optimal statistical decisions for hospital report cards.
    Austin PC; Anderson GM
    Med Decis Making; 2005; 25(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 15673578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of Bayesian methods for profiling hospital performance.
    Austin PC
    Med Decis Making; 2002; 22(2):163-72. PubMed ID: 11958498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Statistical profiling of hospital performance using acute coronary syndrome mortality.
    Manda SO; Gale CP; Hall AS; Gilthorpe MS
    Cardiovasc J Afr; 2012 Nov; 23(10):546-51. PubMed ID: 23192259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improving the statistical approach to health care provider profiling.
    Christiansen CL; Morris CN
    Ann Intern Med; 1997 Oct; 127(8 Pt 2):764-8. PubMed ID: 9382395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hospital size, uncertainty, and pay-for-performance.
    Davidson G; Moscovice I; Remus D
    Health Care Financ Rev; 2007; 29(1):45-57. PubMed ID: 18624079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The use of fixed- and random-effects models for classifying hospitals as mortality outliers: a Monte Carlo assessment.
    Austin PC; Alter DA; Tu JV
    Med Decis Making; 2003; 23(6):526-39. PubMed ID: 14672113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing a multivariate response Bayesian random effects logistic regression model with a latent variable item response theory model for provider profiling on multiple binary indicators simultaneously.
    Austin PC; Lee DS; Leckie G
    Stat Med; 2020 Apr; 39(9):1390-1406. PubMed ID: 32043653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Grading the graders: how hospitals in California and New York perceive and interpret their report cards.
    Romano PS; Rainwater JA; Antonius D
    Med Care; 1999 Mar; 37(3):295-305. PubMed ID: 10098573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of the choice of benchmark on the conclusions of hospital report cards.
    Austin PC; Alter DA; Anderson GM; Tu JV
    Am Heart J; 2004 Dec; 148(6):1041-6. PubMed ID: 15632891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimating the Net Benefit of Improvements in Hospital Performance: G-Computation With Hierarchical Regression Models.
    Austin PC; Lee DS
    Med Care; 2020 Jul; 58(7):651-657. PubMed ID: 32049879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Better-than-average and worse-than-average hospitals may not significantly differ from average hospitals: an analysis of Medicare Hospital Compare ratings.
    Paddock SM; Adams JL; Hoces de la Guardia F
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2015 Feb; 24(2):128-34. PubMed ID: 25394546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Regulator Loss Functions and Hierarchical Modeling for Safety Decision Making.
    Hatfield LA; Baugh CM; Azzone V; Normand ST
    Med Decis Making; 2017 Jul; 37(5):512-522. PubMed ID: 28112994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of a consumer-oriented internet health care report card: the risk of quality ratings based on mortality data.
    Krumholz HM; Rathore SS; Chen J; Wang Y; Radford MJ
    JAMA; 2002 Mar; 287(10):1277-87. PubMed ID: 11886319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimating a composite measure of hospital quality from the Hospital Compare database: differences when using a Bayesian hierarchical latent variable model versus denominator-based weights.
    Shwartz M; Ren J; Peköz EA; Wang X; Cohen AB; Restuccia JD
    Med Care; 2008 Aug; 46(8):778-85. PubMed ID: 18665057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mortality trends during a program that publicly reported hospital performance.
    Baker DW; Einstadter D; Thomas CL; Husak SS; Gordon NH; Cebul RD
    Med Care; 2002 Oct; 40(10):879-90. PubMed ID: 12395022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of a Bayesian vs. a frequentist method for profiling hospital performance.
    Austin PC; Naylor CD; Tu JV
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2001 Feb; 7(1):35-45. PubMed ID: 11240838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].
    Amato L; Colais P; Davoli M; Ferroni E; Fusco D; Minozzi S; Moirano F; Sciattella P; Vecchi S; Ventura M; Perucci CA
    Epidemiol Prev; 2013; 37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100. PubMed ID: 23851286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Examining Hospital Variation on Multiple Indicators of Stroke Quality of Care.
    Austin PC; Fang J; Yu B; Kapral MK
    Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2020 Dec; 13(12):e006968. PubMed ID: 33238729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effectiveness of public report cards for improving the quality of cardiac care: the EFFECT study: a randomized trial.
    Tu JV; Donovan LR; Lee DS; Wang JT; Austin PC; Alter DA; Ko DT
    JAMA; 2009 Dec; 302(21):2330-7. PubMed ID: 19923205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.