256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18474387)
1. Fast prediction of pulsed nonlinear acoustic fields from clinically relevant sources using time-averaged wave envelope approach: comparison of numerical simulations and experimental results.
Wójcik J; Kujawska T; Nowicki A; Lewin PA
Ultrasonics; 2008 Dec; 48(8):707-15. PubMed ID: 18474387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Wave envelopes method for description of nonlinear acoustic wave propagation.
Wójcik J; Nowicki A; Lewin PA; Bloomfield PE; Kujawska T; Filipczyński L
Ultrasonics; 2006 Jul; 44(3):310-29. PubMed ID: 16780911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Measuring derived acoustic power of an ultrasound surgical device in the linear and nonlinear operating modes.
Petosić A; Ivancević B; Svilar D
Ultrasonics; 2009 Jun; 49(6-7):522-31. PubMed ID: 19217636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of nonlinear ultrasound propagation on high intensity brain therapy.
Pinton G; Aubry JF; Fink M; Tanter M
Med Phys; 2011 Mar; 38(3):1207-16. PubMed ID: 21520833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Experimental Validation of k-Wave: Nonlinear Wave Propagation in Layered, Absorbing Fluid Media.
Martin E; Jaros J; Treeby BE
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2020 Jan; 67(1):81-91. PubMed ID: 31535990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An iterative method for the computation of nonlinear, wide-angle, pulsed acoustic fields of medical diagnostic transducers.
Huijssen J; Verweij MD
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jan; 127(1):33-44. PubMed ID: 20058948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Modeling of pulsed finite-amplitude focused sound beams in time domain.
Tavakkoli J; Cathignol D; Souchon R; Sapozhnikov OA
J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Oct; 104(4):2061-72. PubMed ID: 10491689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prediction of ultrasonic field propagation through layered media using the extended angular spectrum method.
Vecchio CJ; Schafer ME; Lewin PA
Ultrasound Med Biol; 1994; 20(7):611-22. PubMed ID: 7810021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pressure field of rectangular transducers at finite amplitude in three dimensions.
Kaya OA; Sahin A; Kaleci D
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2006 Feb; 32(2):271-80. PubMed ID: 16464672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Nonlinear change of on-axis pressure and intensity maxima positions and its relation with the linear focal shift effect.
Makov YN; Sánchez-Morcillo VJ; Camarena F; Espinosa V
Ultrasonics; 2008 Dec; 48(8):678-86. PubMed ID: 18442837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Determination of nonlinear medium parameter B/A using model assisted variable-length measurement approach.
Kujawska T; Nowicki A; Lewin PA
Ultrasonics; 2011 Dec; 51(8):997-1005. PubMed ID: 21722932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. New approaches to nonlinear diffractive field propagation.
Christopher PT; Parker KJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Jul; 90(1):488-99. PubMed ID: 1880298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Modeling of nonlinear ultrasound propagation in tissue from array transducers.
Zemp RJ; Tavakkoli J; Cobbold RS
J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jan; 113(1):139-52. PubMed ID: 12558254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A contrast source method for nonlinear acoustic wave fields in media with spatially inhomogeneous attenuation.
Demi L; van Dongen KW; Verweij MD
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Mar; 129(3):1221-30. PubMed ID: 21428485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. FDTD simulation of finite-amplitude pressure and temperature fields for biomedical ultrasound.
Hallaj IM; Cleveland RO
J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 May; 105(5):L7-12. PubMed ID: 10335650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Time domain simulation of nonlinear acoustic beams generated by rectangular pistons with application to harmonic imaging.
Yang X; Cleveland RO
J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Jan; 117(1):113-23. PubMed ID: 15704404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Calibration of ultrasonic hydrophone probes up to 100 MHz using time gating frequency analysis and finite amplitude waves.
Radulescu EG; Lewin PA; Wójcik J; Nowicki A
Ultrasonics; 2003 Jun; 41(4):247-54. PubMed ID: 12782255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of the pressure field distribution in transcranial ultrasonic neurostimulation.
Younan Y; Deffieux T; Larrat B; Fink M; Tanter M; Aubry JF
Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):082902. PubMed ID: 23927357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. "HIFU Beam:" A Simulator for Predicting Axially Symmetric Nonlinear Acoustic Fields Generated by Focused Transducers in a Layered Medium.
Yuldashev PV; Karzova MM; Kreider W; Rosnitskiy PB; Sapozhnikov OA; Khokhlova VA
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2021 Sep; 68(9):2837-2852. PubMed ID: 33877971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Nonlinear propagation model for ultrasound hydrophones calibration in the frequency range up to 100 MHz.
Radulescu EG; Wójcik J; Lewin PA; Nowicki A
Ultrasonics; 2003 Jun; 41(4):239-45. PubMed ID: 12782254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
