These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

314 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18474860)

  • 1. Quorum decision-making facilitates information transfer in fish shoals.
    Ward AJ; Sumpter DJ; Couzin ID; Hart PJ; Krause J
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2008 May; 105(19):6948-53. PubMed ID: 18474860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quorum decision-making in foraging fish shoals.
    Ward AJ; Krause J; Sumpter DJ
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(3):e32411. PubMed ID: 22412869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Consensus decision making by fish.
    Sumpter DJ; Krause J; James R; Couzin ID; Ward AJ
    Curr Biol; 2008 Nov; 18(22):1773-7. PubMed ID: 19013067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Shoal sex composition and predation risk influence sub-adult threespine stickleback shoaling decisions.
    Rystrom TL; Clement VF; Rick IP; Bakker TCM; Mehlis M
    Behav Processes; 2018 Dec; 157():495-501. PubMed ID: 29933058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Information can explain the dynamics of group order in animal collective behaviour.
    MacGregor HEA; Herbert-Read JE; Ioannou CC
    Nat Commun; 2020 Jun; 11(1):2737. PubMed ID: 32483141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Consistent Individual Differences Drive Collective Behavior and Group Functioning of Schooling Fish.
    Jolles JW; Boogert NJ; Sridhar VH; Couzin ID; Manica A
    Curr Biol; 2017 Sep; 27(18):2862-2868.e7. PubMed ID: 28889975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using Hidden Markov Models to characterise intermittent social behaviour in fish shoals.
    Bode NWF; Seitz MJ
    Naturwissenschaften; 2017 Dec; 105(1-2):7. PubMed ID: 29282542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Familiarity affects social network structure and discovery of prey patch locations in foraging stickleback shoals.
    Atton N; Galef BJ; Hoppitt W; Webster MM; Laland KN
    Proc Biol Sci; 2014 Aug; 281(1789):20140579. PubMed ID: 25009061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How perceived threat increases synchronization in collectively moving animal groups.
    Bode NW; Faria JJ; Franks DW; Krause J; Wood AJ
    Proc Biol Sci; 2010 Oct; 277(1697):3065-70. PubMed ID: 20504810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Consensus and experience trump leadership, suppressing individual personality during social foraging.
    McDonald ND; Rands SA; Hill F; Elder C; Ioannou CC
    Sci Adv; 2016 Sep; 2(9):e1600892. PubMed ID: 27652342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A common rule for decision making in animal collectives across species.
    Arganda S; Pérez-Escudero A; de Polavieja GG
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2012 Dec; 109(50):20508-13. PubMed ID: 23197836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The wisdom of stalemates: consensus and clustering as filtering mechanisms for improving collective accuracy.
    Winklmayr C; Kao AB; Bak-Coleman JB; Romanczuk P
    Proc Biol Sci; 2020 Nov; 287(1938):20201802. PubMed ID: 33143576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fast and accurate decisions through collective vigilance in fish shoals.
    Ward AJ; Herbert-Read JE; Sumpter DJ; Krause J
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2011 Feb; 108(6):2312-5. PubMed ID: 21262802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quorum responses and consensus decision making.
    Sumpter DJ; Pratt SC
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2009 Mar; 364(1518):743-53. PubMed ID: 19073480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fussy groups thwart the collective burden of choice: A theoretical study of house-hunting ants.
    Cronin AL
    J Theor Biol; 2019 Dec; 483():110000. PubMed ID: 31499037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Environmental complexity influences association network structure and network-based diffusion of foraging information in fish shoals.
    Webster MM; Atton N; Hoppitt WJ; Laland KN
    Am Nat; 2013 Feb; 181(2):235-44. PubMed ID: 23348777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Information flow through threespine stickleback networks without social transmission.
    Atton N; Hoppitt W; Webster MM; Galef BG; Laland KN
    Proc Biol Sci; 2012 Oct; 279(1745):4272-8. PubMed ID: 22896644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Who directs group movement? Leader effort versus follower preference in stickleback fish of different personality.
    Nakayama S; Harcourt JL; Johnstone RA; Manica A
    Biol Lett; 2016 May; 12(5):. PubMed ID: 27194292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nine-spined stickleback (Pungitius pungitius): an emerging model for evolutionary biology research.
    Merilä J
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2013 Jun; 1289():18-35. PubMed ID: 23550583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nine-spined sticklebacks exploit the most reliable source when public and private information conflict.
    van Bergen Y; Coolen I; Laland KN
    Proc Biol Sci; 2004 May; 271(1542):957-62. PubMed ID: 15255051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.