159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18477793)
21. CT screening for lung cancer.
Dehavenon A
N Engl J Med; 2007 Feb; 356(7):745-6; author reply 746-7. PubMed ID: 17310515
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Lung cancer screening debate.
Gould MK
Chest; 2003 Feb; 123(2):653-4; author reply 654-5. PubMed ID: 12593410
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Computed Tomography Screening for Lung Cancer: A High-Value Proposition?
Roth JA; Ramsey SD
JAMA; 2016 Jan; 315(1):77-8. PubMed ID: 26746460
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Clearing the air: steps for lung cancer screening success.
Jokerst C; Oliva I; Mohammed TL
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2015; 44(2):113-7. PubMed ID: 25541106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Potential conflict of interest.
Grannis FW
Lung Cancer; 2002 Oct; 38(1):103-4; discussion 105. PubMed ID: 12367803
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Tobacco money at the University of California.
Glantz SA
Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 2005 May; 171(10):1067-9. PubMed ID: 15879426
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Screening for cancer with computed tomography.
Swensen SJ
BMJ; 2003 Apr; 326(7395):894-5. PubMed ID: 12714453
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Lung cancer screening: who will pick up the tab?
Grannis FW
Chest; 2002 May; 121(5):1388-90. PubMed ID: 12006414
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Who is buying bioethics research?
Sharp RR; Scott AL; Landy DC; Kicklighter LA
Am J Bioeth; 2008 Aug; 8(8):54-8; discussion W1-2. PubMed ID: 18802867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Our conflicted medical journals.
N Y Times Web; 2006 Jul; ():WK11. PubMed ID: 16906684
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Conflict of interest: in the eye of the beholder?
Chabner BA
Oncologist; 2008 Mar; 13(3):212-3. PubMed ID: 18378530
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. AACR issues statement on the proposed tobacco settlement.
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1997 Sep; 89(17):1259. PubMed ID: 9293915
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Changing conclusions on secondhand smoke in a sudden infant death syndrome review funded by the tobacco industry.
Tong EK; England L; Glantz SA
Pediatrics; 2005 Mar; 115(3):e356-66. PubMed ID: 15741361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Early Lung Cancer Action Project.
Drury NE; Brown I; Dalrymple-Hay MJ; Delany DJ; Halson P
Lancet; 1999 Oct; 354(9185):1206. PubMed ID: 10513731
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Medical reviews face criticism over lapses.
Armstrong D
Wall St J (East Ed); 2006 Jul; ():B1, B2. PubMed ID: 16909499
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Tough-talking journal editor faces accusations of leniency.
McNeil DG
N Y Times Web; 2006 Aug; ():F1, F3. PubMed ID: 16906685
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Surgery journal threatens ban for authors' hidden conflicts.
Armstrong D
Wall St J (East Ed); 2005 Dec; ():B1, B2. PubMed ID: 16502542
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Science on trial: conflicts of interest jeopardize scientific integrity and public health.
Krimsky S
Genewatch; 2003; 16(5):3-6. PubMed ID: 15025119
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Clarifying Assumptions and Outcomes in Cost-effectiveness Analyses.
ten Haaf K; de Koning HJ
JAMA Oncol; 2016 Feb; 2(2):277-8. PubMed ID: 26869001
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Clarifying Assumptions and Outcomes in Cost-Effectiveness Analyses--Reply.
Goffin JR; Flanagan WM; Evans WK
JAMA Oncol; 2016 Feb; 2(2):278-9. PubMed ID: 26869003
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
