These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18477826)

  • 21. Skeletal and dentoalveolar changes concurrent to use of Twin Block appliance in class II division I cases with a deficient mandible: a cephalometric study.
    Sharma AK; Sachdev V; Singla A; Kirtaniya BC
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2012; 30(3):218-26. PubMed ID: 23263425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The miniscrew Herbst.
    Luzi C; Luzi V; Carletti P; Melsen B
    J Clin Orthod; 2012 Jul; 46(7):399-405; quiz 437-8. PubMed ID: 23059462
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Mandibular protraction appliances for Class II treatment.
    Coelho Filho CM
    J Clin Orthod; 1995 May; 29(5):319-36. PubMed ID: 8617856
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. New generation open-bite treatment with zygomatic anchorage.
    Erverdi N; Usumez S; Solak A
    Angle Orthod; 2006 May; 76(3):519-26. PubMed ID: 16637736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. "Sagittal first" management of a growing skeletal class II patient.
    Balasubramanian M; Ojha A
    J Clin Orthod; 2010 Aug; 44(8):473-80. PubMed ID: 21105584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A comparison of the effects of 2 mandibular anchorage systems used with a 3-dimensional bimetric maxillary distalizing arch.
    Okay C; Gülsen A; Keykubat A; Ucem TT; Yüksel S
    World J Orthod; 2006; 7(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 16779970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. An assessment of late fixed functional treatment and the stability of Forsus appliance effects.
    Gao W; Li X; Bai Y
    Aust Orthod J; 2014 May; 30(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 24968640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Correction of a severe skeletal Class II occlusion with a fixed functional appliance anchored on mini-implants: a patient report.
    Gandedkar NH; Revankar AV; Ganeshkar SV
    World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):369-79. PubMed ID: 21491004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Treatment of Skeletal Class II Malocclusion with Forsus Fatigue Resistance Appliance and Its Re-activation by Using Custom-made Crimp.
    Aileni KR; Rachala MR; Dharmender SR; Rajesh V; Sandeep B
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2016; 27(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 27319039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Using the HERBST appliance with atypical extractions in the lower dental arch.
    Filho LC; Siqueira DF; de Castro RC; Comparim R; Blanco MR; de Almeida Cardoso M
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2013; 24(4):19-24. PubMed ID: 24640071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Treatment effects of a twin-force bite corrector versus an activator in comparison with an untreated Class II sample: a preliminary report.
    Dalci O; Altug AT; Memikoglu UT
    Aust Orthod J; 2014 May; 30(1):45-53. PubMed ID: 24968645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Mandibular asymmetry treated with a modified activator appliance.
    Leonardi R; Barbato E
    J Craniofac Surg; 2007 Jul; 18(4):939-43. PubMed ID: 17667690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluating the effect of Sabbagh Universal Spring during treatment of growing class II malocclusions.
    Hanandeh BA; El-Bialy AA
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2010; 21(4):13-24. PubMed ID: 21314084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Asymmetrical mandibular molar protraction with conventional mechanics.
    Cozzani M; Mazzotta L; Rinchuse DJ; Cozzani P
    J Clin Orthod; 2015 May; 49(5):304-11. PubMed ID: 26105177
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Maxillary molar distalization or mandibular enhancement: a cephalometric comparison of comprehensive orthodontic treatment including the pendulum and the Herbst appliances.
    Burkhardt DR; McNamara JA; Baccetti T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Feb; 123(2):108-16. PubMed ID: 12594414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Orthodontic retreatment of a Class III patient with significant midline asymmetry and bilateral posterior crossbite.
    Brunetto AR
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(1):118-26. PubMed ID: 25741833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Class II malocclusion with complex problems treated with a novel combination of lingual orthodontic appliances and lingual arches.
    Yanagita T; Nakamura M; Kawanabe N; Yamashiro T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jul; 146(1):98-107. PubMed ID: 24975004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Induced condylar growth in a patient with hemifacial microsomia.
    Kaplan RG
    Angle Orthod; 1989; 59(2):85-90. PubMed ID: 2637677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparative efficiency of Class II malocclusion treatment with the pendulum appliance or two maxillary premolar extractions and edgewise appliances [corrected].
    Pinzan-Vercelino CR; Janson G; Pinzan A; de Almeida RR; de Freitas MR; de Freitas KM
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):333-40. PubMed ID: 19395372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Intraoral craniofacial manipulation by using MRI appliance.
    Al-Sulaiti N; White GE
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2001; 26(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 11688809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.