These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18479866)

  • 1. Breast MRI: Are T2 IR sequences useful in the evaluation of breast lesions?
    Ballesio L; Savelli S; Angeletti M; Porfiri LM; D'Ambrosio I; Maggi C; Castro ED; Bennati P; Fanelli GP; Vestri AR; Manganaro L
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jul; 71(1):96-101. PubMed ID: 18479866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A combined high temporal and high spatial resolution 3 Tesla MR imaging protocol for the assessment of breast lesions: initial results.
    Pinker K; Grabner G; Bogner W; Gruber S; Szomolanyi P; Trattnig S; Heinz-Peer G; Weber M; Fitzal F; Pluschnig U; Rudas M; Helbich T
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep; 44(9):553-8. PubMed ID: 19652611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Enhanced mass on contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: Lesion characterization using combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR images.
    Yabuuchi H; Matsuo Y; Okafuji T; Kamitani T; Soeda H; Setoguchi T; Sakai S; Hatakenaka M; Kubo M; Sadanaga N; Yamamoto H; Honda H
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Nov; 28(5):1157-65. PubMed ID: 18972357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Angle between 1 and 4 min gives the most significant difference in time-intensity curves between benign disease and breast cancer: analysis of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging in 103 patients with breast lesions.
    Hara M; Watanabe T; Okumura A; Kato K; Mohri N; Ishikawa M; Mizuno A; Takeyama H
    Clin Imaging; 2009; 33(5):335-42. PubMed ID: 19712811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Chemical shift MRI: is there any contribution to morphologic evaluation of solid breast masses?
    Gokalp G; Topal U; Bolca N; Ercan I
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Oct; 16(10):1263-71. PubMed ID: 19608436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Characterization of breast cancer types by texture analysis of magnetic resonance images.
    Holli K; Lääperi AL; Harrison L; Luukkaala T; Toivonen T; Ryymin P; Dastidar P; Soimakallio S; Eskola H
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Feb; 17(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 19945302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of suspicious nipple discharge by magnetic resonance mammography based on breast imaging reporting and data system magnetic resonance imaging descriptors.
    Tokuda Y; Kuriyama K; Nakamoto A; Choi S; Yutani K; Kunitomi Y; Haneda T; Kawai M; Masuda N; Takeda M; Nakamura H
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(1):58-62. PubMed ID: 19188786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [MR tomographic characterization of suspicious breast lesions with dynamic susceptibility-weighted T2* sequences].
    Dannert S; Krück W; Schick F; Claussen CD; Müller-Schimpfle M
    Rofo; 2001 Jan; 173(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 11225415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of three different software systems in the evaluation of dynamic MRI of the breast.
    Kurz KD; Steinhaus D; Klar V; Cohnen M; Wittsack HJ; Saleh A; Mödder U; Blondin D
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Feb; 69(2):300-7. PubMed ID: 18060715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Characterization of breast lesions with CE-MR multimodal morphological and kinetic analysis: comparison with conventional mammography and high-resolution ultrasound.
    Vassiou K; Kanavou T; Vlychou M; Poultsidi A; Athanasiou E; Arvanitis DL; Fezoulidis IV
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 70(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 18295425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diagnosis of breast tumors by contrast-enhanced MR imaging: comparison between the diagnostic performance of dynamic enhancement patterns and morphologic features.
    Goto M; Ito H; Akazawa K; Kubota T; Kizu O; Yamada K; Nishimura T
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Jan; 25(1):104-12. PubMed ID: 17152054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Nonmass lesions in magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: additional T2-weighted images improve diagnostic accuracy.
    Baltzer PA; Dietzel M; Kaiser WA
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2011; 35(3):361-6. PubMed ID: 21586932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Diagnostic value of a breast MRI score for the prediction of malignancy of breast lesions detected solely with MRI].
    Siegmann KC; Moron HU; Baur A; Hahn M; Vogel U; Claussen CD; Bitzer M
    Rofo; 2009 Jun; 181(6):556-63. PubMed ID: 19452398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Whole-body MRI of multiple myeloma: comparison of different MRI sequences in assessment of different growth patterns.
    Weininger M; Lauterbach B; Knop S; Pabst T; Kenn W; Hahn D; Beissert M
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Feb; 69(2):339-45. PubMed ID: 18096344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Application of computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) in MR-mammography (MRM): do we really need whole lesion time curve distribution analysis?
    Baltzer PA; Renz DM; Kullnig PE; Gajda M; Camara O; Kaiser WA
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Apr; 16(4):435-42. PubMed ID: 19268855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Malignant-lesion segmentation using 4D co-occurrence texture analysis applied to dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance breast image data.
    Woods BJ; Clymer BD; Kurc T; Heverhagen JT; Stevens R; Orsdemir A; Bulan O; Knopp MV
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Mar; 25(3):495-501. PubMed ID: 17279534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. New spatiotemporal features for improved discrimination of benign and malignant lesions in dynamic contrast-enhanced-magnetic resonance imaging of the breast.
    Gal Y; Mehnert A; Bradley A; Kennedy D; Crozier S
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2011; 35(5):645-52. PubMed ID: 21926864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Three-dimensional magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) score assessed with an isotropic three-dimensional true fast imaging with steady-state precession sequence at 3.0 Tesla.
    Welsch GH; Zak L; Mamisch TC; Resinger C; Marlovits S; Trattnig S
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep; 44(9):603-12. PubMed ID: 19692843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Voxel-based iterative sensitivity (VBIS) analysis: methods and a validation of intensity scaling for T2-weighted imaging of hippocampal sclerosis.
    Abbott DF; Pell GS; Pardoe H; Jackson GD
    Neuroimage; 2009 Feb; 44(3):812-9. PubMed ID: 18996207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fat suppression with spectrally selective inversion vs. high spectral and spatial resolution MRI of breast lesions: qualitative and quantitative comparisons.
    Fan X; Abe H; Medved M; Foxley S; Arkani S; Zamora MA; Olopade OI; Newstead GM; Karczmar GS
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Dec; 24(6):1311-5. PubMed ID: 17096393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.