BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1848139)

  • 1. Chemosensitivity testing of an ovarian cancer cell line: comparison of MTT assay and [3H]-thymidine incorporation.
    Yu KJ; Ng HT; Chao KC; Chang CC; Kan YY
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei); 1991 Feb; 47(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 1848139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The evaluation of adenosine triphosphate bioluminescence assay for chemosensitivity testing of ovarian cancer cell line].
    Shi W; Gu M; Liang L
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 1996 Feb; 31(2):79-82. PubMed ID: 8758798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Basic study on in vitro chemosensitivity tests].
    Iijima N; Sekiya S; Tokita H; Takamizawa H
    Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1991 Feb; 43(2):191-6. PubMed ID: 2013708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Drug design and testing: profiling of antiproliferative agents for cancer therapy using a cell-based methyl-[3H]-thymidine incorporation assay.
    Griffiths M; Sundaram H
    Methods Mol Biol; 2011; 731():451-65. PubMed ID: 21516428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of a rapid tetrazolium-based colorimetric assay for selecting anticancer drugs.
    Chen CF; Hwang JM; Wu CH; Chen CS; Chen KY
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei); 1990 Jul; 46(1):7-16. PubMed ID: 2176928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In vitro chemotherapy sensitivity testing of human ovarian carcinoma: comparison of optical colony counting and [3H]thymidine incorporation assays.
    Tsushima K; Podratz KC; Stanhope CR; Lieber MM
    Gynecol Oncol; 1987 Oct; 28(2):170-80. PubMed ID: 3666575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Key points and problems concerning chemosensitivity tests, with special reference to MTT assay].
    Nishida M; Kohno K; Nishide K
    Hum Cell; 1992 Mar; 5(1):87-98. PubMed ID: 1419954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of chemosensitivity tests: clonogenic assay versus MTT assay.
    Kawada K; Yonei T; Ueoka H; Kiura K; Tabata M; Takigawa N; Harada M; Tanimoto M
    Acta Med Okayama; 2002 Jun; 56(3):129-34. PubMed ID: 12108583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of MTT assay in agarose for chemosensitivity testing of human cancers: comparison with MTT assay.
    Abe R; Ueo H; Akiyoshi T
    Oncology; 1994; 51(5):416-25. PubMed ID: 8052482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of tetrazolium colorimetric and [3H]-uridine assays for in vitro chemosensitivity testing.
    Ford CH; Richardson VJ; Tsaltas G
    Cancer Chemother Pharmacol; 1989; 24(5):295-301. PubMed ID: 2788039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Chemosensitivity testing of fresh human leukemia cells using both a dye exclusion assay and a tetrazolium dye (MTT) assay.
    Kirkpatrick DL; Duke M; Goh TS
    Leuk Res; 1990; 14(5):459-66. PubMed ID: 2345469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of cell proliferation and cell death based assays in chemosensitivity testing.
    Gerçel-Taylor C; Ackermann MA; Taylor DD
    Anticancer Res; 2001; 21(4A):2761-8. PubMed ID: 11724352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Effects of combination chemotherapy of ovarian cancer in vitro].
    Lu SM
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1992 Oct; 72(10):590-2, 638. PubMed ID: 1284340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Chemosensitivity test with endoscopic biopsy specimens].
    Wada K; Sato Y; Kawashima M; Yamauchi M; Kaneshiro K; Kondo T
    Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1995 Apr; 22(5):671-7. PubMed ID: 7717720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Basic study on the chemosensitivity test by miniaturized improved nucleic acid precursor incorporation assay (MINI assay)].
    Mogi M; Motohashi M; Hirota T; Ohshima K; Takahashi N; Kinoshita Y; Tanigawa M; Yoshinobu T; Koya Y; Masutani M
    Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1990 Jan; 17(1):89-95. PubMed ID: 1688701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [In vitro chemosensitivity assay using a double-layer-agar system: human tumor cloning assay and thymidine incorporation assay].
    Tanigawa N; Shimomatsuya T; Fujii H; Yamakawa M; Muraoka R; Saitoh H
    Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1993 Mar; 20(4):440-6. PubMed ID: 8452381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A feasibility study of the MTT assay for chemosensitivity testing in ovarian malignancy.
    Wilson JK; Sargent JM; Elgie AW; Hill JG; Taylor CG
    Br J Cancer; 1990 Aug; 62(2):189-94. PubMed ID: 2386733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Result of individualized chemotherapy with a newly developed in vitro chemosensitivity testing in ovarian cancer].
    Iijima N; Sekiya S; Tokita H; Oosaki T; Takamizawa H
    Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1991 Oct; 43(10):1323-8. PubMed ID: 1955784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Chemosensitivity testing of fresh and continuous tumor cell cultures using lactate dehydrogenase.
    Coley HM; Lewandowicz G; Sargent JM; Verrill MW
    Anticancer Res; 1997; 17(1A):231-6. PubMed ID: 9066657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assay of anticancer drugs in tissue culture: comparison of a tetrazolium-based assay and a protein binding dye assay in short-term cultures derived from human malignant glioma.
    Haselsberger K; Peterson DC; Thomas DG; Darling JL
    Anticancer Drugs; 1996 May; 7(3):331-8. PubMed ID: 8792008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.