These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18481585)

  • 1. Checks and balances: the welcomed tension between philosophy and science.
    Watson JC; Arp R
    Q Rev Biol; 2008 Mar; 83(1):17-28. PubMed ID: 18481585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ethical muscle and scientific interests: a role for philosophy in scientific research.
    Kaposy C
    Q Rev Biol; 2008 Mar; 83(1):77-86. PubMed ID: 18481591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The borderlands between science and philosophy: an introduction.
    Pigliucci M
    Q Rev Biol; 2008 Mar; 83(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 18481584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Well-Being and Pluralism.
    Mitchell P; Alexandrova A
    J Happiness Stud; 2021; 22(6):2411-2433. PubMed ID: 33106750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Philosophy and the front line of science.
    Pernu TK
    Q Rev Biol; 2008 Mar; 83(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 18481586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Beyond medical ethics: new directions for philosophy and medicine.
    Sassower R; Grodin MA
    J Med Humanit Bioeth; 1988; 9(2):121-34. PubMed ID: 11650189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. From philosophy to science (to natural philosophy): evolutionary developmental perspectives.
    Love AC
    Q Rev Biol; 2008 Mar; 83(1):65-76. PubMed ID: 18481590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Value-entanglement and the integrity of scientific research.
    Resnik DB; Elliott KC
    Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2019 Jun; 75():1-11. PubMed ID: 31426942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Creating reflective spaces: interactions between philosophers and biomedical scientists.
    de Melo-Martín I
    Perspect Biol Med; 2009; 52(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 19168943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Collaborative explanation, explanatory roles, and scientific explaining in practice.
    Love AC
    Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2015 Aug; 52():88-94. PubMed ID: 26193791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biohumanities: rethinking the relationship between biosciences, philosophy and history of science, and society.
    Stotz K; Griffiths PE
    Q Rev Biol; 2008 Mar; 83(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 18481587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. EMPIRICISM IN LATTER-DAY BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE.
    BIXENSTINE VE
    Science; 1964 Jul; 145(3631):464-7. PubMed ID: 14163765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Philosophy, history and sociology of science: interdisciplinary relations and complex social identities.
    Riesch H
    Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2014 Dec; 48():30-7. PubMed ID: 25571743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. When scientists and philosophers talk to each other: proceedings of the Stony Brook "sci-phi" symposium.
    Pigliucci M
    Q Rev Biol; 2008 Mar; 83(1):5. PubMed ID: 18481583
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Communicating with scientific graphics: A descriptive inquiry into non-ideal normativity.
    Sheredos B
    Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci; 2017 Jun; 63():32-44. PubMed ID: 28412578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The philosophy of chemistry.
    Schummer J
    Endeavour; 2003 Mar; 27(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 12642145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Objectivity and ethics in environmental health science.
    Wing S
    Environ Health Perspect; 2003 Nov; 111(14):1809-18. PubMed ID: 14594636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. What concept analysis in philosophy of science should be (and why competing philosophical analyses of gene concepts cannot be tested by polling scientists).
    Waters CK
    Hist Philos Life Sci; 2004; 26(1):29-58. PubMed ID: 15791805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Philosophical bias is the one bias that science cannot avoid.
    Andersen F; Anjum RL; Rocca E
    Elife; 2019 Mar; 8():. PubMed ID: 30864947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Redefining ecological ethics: science, policy, and philosophy at Cape Horn.
    Frodeman R
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2008 Dec; 14(4):597-610. PubMed ID: 18941926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.