These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18481595)

  • 21. Questions remain over AfC implementation.
    Nurs Times; 2006 Jan 10-16; 102(2):10. PubMed ID: 16429679
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Deal or no deal? Offers of a 3-year pay package.
    Bailey A
    Br J Nurs; 2008 Apr 24-May 7; 17(8):495. PubMed ID: 18563019
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Blair's top-up cash pledge given a mixed reception.
    Martell R; Munro R
    Nurs Times; 2000 Nov 23-29; 96(47):10-1. PubMed ID: 11965743
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. One year on, the real cost of the pay freeze.
    Snow T; Sprinks J
    Nurs Stand; 2012 Apr 11-17; 26(32):12-3. PubMed ID: 22594198
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Who spends the most on nurses?
    Hurst K
    Nurs Stand; 2008 Aug 27-Sep 2; 22(51):14. PubMed ID: 18777829
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Does private always mean prosperous?
    Halls M
    Nurs Times; 2002 Sep 3-9; 98(36):16-7. PubMed ID: 12244661
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Pay: don't scapegoat nurses.
    Gray J
    Nurs Stand; 2006 Mar 22-28; 20(28):1. PubMed ID: 16596853
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The only way to bump up nurse numbers is to bump up the numbers on their pay slips.
    Nurs Times; 2000 Dec 14-2001 Jan 3; 96(50):3. PubMed ID: 11965802
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Look beyond disappointment.
    Madge T
    Nurs Stand; 2006 Apr 5-11; 20(30):1. PubMed ID: 16623284
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Review of the year 2000.
    Nurs Times; 2000 Dec 14-2001 Jan 3; 96(50):10-2. PubMed ID: 11965786
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Get the best. Improve your awareness of Agenda for Change and make it work for you.
    Harding S; Salmon F
    Nurs Stand; 2005 Jan 19-25; 19(19):112. PubMed ID: 15700867
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Pay review evidence sparks debate about whether money is a motivator.
    Snow T
    Nurs Stand; 2007 Nov; 22(11):12-3. PubMed ID: 18075018
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Beware of hollow promises.
    Gray J
    Nurs Stand; 2009 Apr 15-21; 23(32):1. PubMed ID: 19441619
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Labour markets in the NHS: an agenda for research.
    Elliott B
    Health Econ; 2003 Oct; 12(10):797-801. PubMed ID: 14508865
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Hysteria over agencies.
    Murgatroyd R
    Nurs Times; 2000 Nov 30-Dec 6; 96(48):21. PubMed ID: 11965984
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Data 'so poor it had to be disregarded'.
    Snow T
    Nurs Stand; 2007 Mar 7-13; 21(26):12-3. PubMed ID: 17396419
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Nurses split over physician assistants.
    Clarke-Jones J
    Nurs Times; 2005 Nov 15-21; 101(46):10. PubMed ID: 16315792
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Phased justice?
    Br Med J; 1978 May; 1(6123):1305-6. PubMed ID: 647252
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Review Body reports.
    Br Med J; 1979 Jun; 1(6177):1521-2. PubMed ID: 466098
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Healthcare staff asked to work unpaid shifts in bid to save cash.
    Kendall-Raynor P
    Nurs Stand; 2011 Jun 8-14; 25(40):5. PubMed ID: 21755783
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.