184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18482060)
21. Differential measurement errors in zero-truncated regression models for count data.
Huang YH; Hwang WH; Chen FY
Biometrics; 2011 Dec; 67(4):1471-80. PubMed ID: 21466529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Analysis of longitudinal data with unmeasured confounders.
Palta M; Yao TJ
Biometrics; 1991 Dec; 47(4):1355-69. PubMed ID: 1786323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Sensitivity Analysis Without Assumptions.
Ding P; VanderWeele TJ
Epidemiology; 2016 May; 27(3):368-77. PubMed ID: 26841057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding in a marginal structural Cox proportional hazards model.
Klungsøyr O; Sexton J; Sandanger I; Nygård JF
Lifetime Data Anal; 2009 Jun; 15(2):278-94. PubMed ID: 19109770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Sensitivity analysis for interactions under unmeasured confounding.
Vanderweele TJ; Mukherjee B; Chen J
Stat Med; 2012 Sep; 31(22):2552-64. PubMed ID: 21976358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A Bayesian approach to a logistic regression model with incomplete information.
Choi T; Schervish MJ; Schmitt KA; Small MJ
Biometrics; 2008 Jun; 64(2):424-30. PubMed ID: 17764482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Semiparametric Bayesian analysis of case-control data under conditional gene-environment independence.
Mukherjee B; Zhang L; Ghosh M; Sinha S
Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):834-44. PubMed ID: 17489972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Assessing the impact of unmeasured confounders for credible and reliable real-world evidence.
Zhang X; Stamey JD; Mathur MB
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2020 Oct; 29(10):1219-1227. PubMed ID: 32929830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Confounder adjustment in observational comparative effectiveness researches: (2) statistical adjustment approaches for unmeasured confounders].
Huang LL; Wei YY; Chen F
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Nov; 40(11):1450-1455. PubMed ID: 31838820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Mixed-effect hybrid models for longitudinal data with nonignorable dropout.
Yuan Y; Little RJ
Biometrics; 2009 Jun; 65(2):478-86. PubMed ID: 18759842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Varying coefficients model with measurement error.
Li L; Greene T
Biometrics; 2008 Jun; 64(2):519-26. PubMed ID: 17970822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounders using an electronic spreadsheet.
Cabral MD; Luiz RR
Rev Saude Publica; 2007 Jun; 41(3):446-52. PubMed ID: 17515999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Semiparametric approaches for joint modeling of longitudinal and survival data with time-varying coefficients.
Song X; Wang CY
Biometrics; 2008 Jun; 64(2):557-66. PubMed ID: 17725812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Variable selection for clustering with Gaussian mixture models.
Maugis C; Celeux G; Martin-Magniette ML
Biometrics; 2009 Sep; 65(3):701-9. PubMed ID: 19210744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Quantifying the predictive performance of prognostic models for censored survival data with time-dependent covariates.
Schoop R; Graf E; Schumacher M
Biometrics; 2008 Jun; 64(2):603-10. PubMed ID: 17764480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. On latent-variable model misspecification in structural measurement error models for binary response.
Huang X; Tebbs JM
Biometrics; 2009 Sep; 65(3):710-8. PubMed ID: 18945265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Analyzing spatially distributed binary data using independent-block estimating equations.
Oman SD; Landsman V; Carmel Y; Kadmon R
Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):892-900. PubMed ID: 17489971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. An exact test for detecting inconsistency in readers interpretation over time in screening mammograms.
Lee JH; Eschrich S; Beam C
Biom J; 2007 Aug; 49(5):672-81. PubMed ID: 17638286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Uncovering a latent multinomial: analysis of mark-recapture data with misidentification.
Link WA; Yoshizaki J; Bailey LL; Pollock KH
Biometrics; 2010 Mar; 66(1):178-85. PubMed ID: 19397581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Hierarchical priors for bias parameters in Bayesian sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding.
McCandless LC; Gustafson P; Levy AR; Richardson S
Stat Med; 2012 Feb; 31(4):383-96. PubMed ID: 22253142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
