BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18482060)

  • 41. Falsification Tests for Instrumental Variable Designs With an Application to Tendency to Operate.
    Keele L; Zhao Q; Kelz RR; Small D
    Med Care; 2019 Feb; 57(2):167-171. PubMed ID: 30520835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Related causal frameworks for surrogate outcomes.
    Joffe MM; Greene T
    Biometrics; 2009 Jun; 65(2):530-8. PubMed ID: 18759836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Bayesian modeling of cost-effectiveness studies with unmeasured confounding: a simulation study.
    Stamey JD; Beavers DP; Faries D; Price KL; Seaman JW
    Pharm Stat; 2014; 13(1):94-100. PubMed ID: 24446072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Assessing moderated mediation in linear models requires fewer confounding assumptions than assessing mediation.
    Loeys T; Talloen W; Goubert L; Moerkerke B; Vansteelandt S
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2016 Nov; 69(3):352-374. PubMed ID: 27711981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Diagnosing diagnostic tests: evaluating the assumptions underlying the estimation of sensitivity and specificity in the absence of a gold standard.
    Toft N; Jørgensen E; Højsgaard S
    Prev Vet Med; 2005 Apr; 68(1):19-33. PubMed ID: 15795013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A general approach to sample size determination for prevalence surveys that use dual test protocols.
    Cheng D; Stamey JD; Branscum AJ
    Biom J; 2007 Aug; 49(5):694-706. PubMed ID: 17722203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Sample size importantly limits the usefulness of instrumental variable methods, depending on instrument strength and level of confounding.
    Boef AG; Dekkers OM; Vandenbroucke JP; le Cessie S
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Nov; 67(11):1258-64. PubMed ID: 25124167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Robustness of a parametric model for informatively censored bivariate longitudinal data under misspecification of its distributional assumptions: A simulation study.
    Pantazis N; Touloumi G
    Stat Med; 2007 Dec; 26(30):5473-85. PubMed ID: 18058854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Estimating treatment effects with partially observed covariates using outcome regression with missing indicators.
    Blake HA; Leyrat C; Mansfield KE; Tomlinson LA; Carpenter J; Williamson EJ
    Biom J; 2020 Mar; 62(2):428-443. PubMed ID: 31994239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. A latent-class mixture model for incomplete longitudinal Gaussian data.
    Beunckens C; Molenberghs G; Verbeke G; Mallinckrodt C
    Biometrics; 2008 Mar; 64(1):96-105. PubMed ID: 17608789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Adjusting for bias and unmeasured confounding in Mendelian randomization studies with binary responses.
    Palmer TM; Thompson JR; Tobin MD; Sheehan NA; Burton PR
    Int J Epidemiol; 2008 Oct; 37(5):1161-8. PubMed ID: 18463132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. IV estimation without distributional assumptions.
    Lange T; Jensen AKG
    Biom J; 2020 May; 62(3):688-696. PubMed ID: 32022297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Prediction of random effects in linear and generalized linear models under model misspecification.
    McCulloch CE; Neuhaus JM
    Biometrics; 2011 Mar; 67(1):270-9. PubMed ID: 20528860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. On estimation of the survivor average causal effect in observational studies when important confounders are missing due to death.
    Egleston BL; Scharfstein DO; MacKenzie E
    Biometrics; 2009 Jun; 65(2):497-504. PubMed ID: 18759833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Estimating population size for a continuous time frailty model with covariates in a capture-recapture study.
    Xu Y; Liu L; You N; Pan H; Yip P
    Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):917-21. PubMed ID: 17403102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Bayesian semiparametric regression in the presence of conditionally heteroscedastic measurement and regression errors.
    Sarkar A; Mallick BK; Carroll RJ
    Biometrics; 2014 Dec; 70(4):823-34. PubMed ID: 24965117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Model assisted sensitivity analyses for hidden bias with binary outcomes.
    Nattino G; Lu B
    Biometrics; 2018 Dec; 74(4):1141-1149. PubMed ID: 29992547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Controlling for continuous confounders in epidemiologic research.
    Brenner H; Blettner M
    Epidemiology; 1997 Jul; 8(4):429-34. PubMed ID: 9209859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Diagnosis of random-effect model misspecification in generalized linear mixed models for binary response.
    Huang X
    Biometrics; 2009 Jun; 65(2):361-8. PubMed ID: 18759837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Semiparametric methods in the proportional odds model for ordinal response data with missing covariates.
    Lee SM; Gee MJ; Hsieh SH
    Biometrics; 2011 Sep; 67(3):788-98. PubMed ID: 21039396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.