185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18482091)
1. Competency domains in an undergraduate Objective Structured Clinical Examination: their impact on compensatory standard setting.
Reece A; Chung EM; Gardiner RM; Williams SE
Med Educ; 2008 Jun; 42(6):600-6. PubMed ID: 18482091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Factor analysis can be a useful standard setting tool in a high stakes OSCE assessment.
Chesser AM; Laing MR; Miedzybrodzka ZH; Brittenden J; Heys SD
Med Educ; 2004 Aug; 38(8):825-31. PubMed ID: 15271042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Design and validation of 2 objective structured clinical examination stations to assess core undergraduate examination skills of the hand and knee.
Raj N; Badcock LJ; Brown GA; Deighton CM; O'Reilly SC
J Rheumatol; 2007 Feb; 34(2):421-4. PubMed ID: 17304661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The relationship between second-year medical students' OSCE scores and USMLE Step 2 scores.
Simon SR; Bui A; Day S; Berti D; Volkan K
J Eval Clin Pract; 2007 Dec; 13(6):901-5. PubMed ID: 18070260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Who will pass the dental OSCE? Comparison of the Angoff and the borderline regression standard setting methods.
Schoonheim-Klein M; Muijtjens A; Habets L; Manogue M; van der Vleuten C; van der Velden U
Eur J Dent Educ; 2009 Aug; 13(3):162-71. PubMed ID: 19630935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Item analysis to improve reliability for an internal medicine undergraduate OSCE.
Auewarakul C; Downing SM; Praditsuwan R; Jaturatamrong U
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2005; 10(2):105-13. PubMed ID: 16078095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Order effects in high stakes undergraduate examinations: an analysis of 5 years of administrative data in one UK medical school.
Burt J; Abel G; Barclay M; Evans R; Benson J; Gurnell M
BMJ Open; 2016 Oct; 6(10):e012541. PubMed ID: 27729351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Unintentional failure to assess for experience in senior undergraduate OSCE scoring.
Peeraer G; Muijtjens AM; De Winter BY; Remmen R; Hendrickx K; Bossaert L; Scherpbier AJ
Med Educ; 2008 Jul; 42(7):669-75. PubMed ID: 18588647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The impact of case specificity and generalisable skills on clinical performance: a correlated traits-correlated methods approach.
Wimmers PF; Fung CC
Med Educ; 2008 Jun; 42(6):580-8. PubMed ID: 18482089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of MSAT: an instrument to measure medical students' self-assessed confidence in musculoskeletal examination skills.
Vivekananda-Schmidt P; Lewis M; Hassell AB; Coady D; Walker D; Kay L; McLean MJ; Haq I; Rahman A
Med Educ; 2007 Apr; 41(4):402-10. PubMed ID: 17430286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Application of Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) for pediatric internship assessment in two schools of medicine].
Triviño X; Vásquez A; Mena A; López A; Aldunate M; Varas M; Lillo R; Wright A
Rev Med Chil; 2002 Jul; 130(7):817-24. PubMed ID: 12235909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comprehensive undergraduate medical assessments improve prediction of clinical performance.
Wilkinson TJ; Frampton CM
Med Educ; 2004 Oct; 38(10):1111-6. PubMed ID: 15461657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sharpening the eye of the OSCE with critical action analysis.
Payne NJ; Bradley EB; Heald EB; Maughan KL; Michaelsen VE; Wang XQ; Corbett EC
Acad Med; 2008 Oct; 83(10):900-5. PubMed ID: 18820517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development of a tool to support holistic generic assessment of clinical procedure skills.
McKinley RK; Strand J; Gray T; Schuwirth L; Alun-Jones T; Miller H
Med Educ; 2008 Jun; 42(6):619-27. PubMed ID: 18435710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Exploring the use of videotaped objective structured clinical examination in the assessment of joint examination skills of medical students.
Vivekananda-Schmidt P; Lewis M; Coady D; Morley C; Kay L; Walker D; Hassell AB
Arthritis Rheum; 2007 Jun; 57(5):869-76. PubMed ID: 17530689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Setting school-level outcome standards.
Stern DT; Friedman Ben-David M; Norcini J; Wojtczak A; Schwarz MR
Med Educ; 2006 Feb; 40(2):166-72. PubMed ID: 16451245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A final clinical examination using a sequential design to improve cost-effectiveness.
Cookson J; Crossley J; Fagan G; McKendree J; Mohsen A
Med Educ; 2011 Jul; 45(7):741-7. PubMed ID: 21649707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. On the reliability of a dental OSCE, using SEM: effect of different days.
Schoonheim-Klein M; Muijtjens A; Habets L; Manogue M; Van der Vleuten C; Hoogstraten J; Van der Velden U
Eur J Dent Educ; 2008 Aug; 12(3):131-7. PubMed ID: 18666893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of differential rater function over time (DRIFT) on objective structured clinical examination ratings.
McLaughlin K; Ainslie M; Coderre S; Wright B; Violato C
Med Educ; 2009 Oct; 43(10):989-92. PubMed ID: 19769648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical competence understood through the construct validity of three clerkship assessments.
Lee M; Wimmers PF
Med Educ; 2011 Aug; 45(8):849-57. PubMed ID: 21752082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
