BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

594 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18482191)

  • 1. The suitability of hemolyzed specimens for compatibility testing using automated technology.
    Laga A; Cheves T; Maroto S; Coutts M; Sweeney J
    Transfusion; 2008 Aug; 48(8):1713-20. PubMed ID: 18482191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validation of a hospital-laboratory workstation for immunohematologic methods.
    Schoenfeld H; Pretzel KJ; von Heymann C; Neuner B; Kalus U; Kiesewetter H; Pruss A
    Transfusion; 2010 Jan; 50(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 19709392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of specimen hemolysis on coagulation test results.
    Laga AC; Cheves TA; Sweeney JD
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2006 Nov; 126(5):748-55. PubMed ID: 17050072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of immunohematologic routine methods using the new erythrocyte-magnetized technology on the QWALYS 2 system.
    Schoenfeld H; Bulling K; von Heymann C; Neuner B; Kalus U; Kiesewetter H; Pruss A
    Transfusion; 2009 Jul; 49(7):1347-52. PubMed ID: 19389030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Donors' blood group declaration before donation can be used as a tool for electronic crossmatching.
    Arslan O
    Transfus Med; 2005 Dec; 15(6):487-92. PubMed ID: 16359420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Automated blood grouping by gel technology.
    Parker PI; Scott Y; McArdle B; Wallis JP
    Br J Biomed Sci; 1995 Dec; 52(4):266-70. PubMed ID: 8555780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comprehensive Blood Bank Survey.
    Walker RH; Cooper ES; Hoeltge GA; de Jongh D; Kuban DJ
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1985 Mar; 109(3):215-20. PubMed ID: 3919685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The 1987 Comprehensive Blood Bank Survey of the College of American Pathologists.
    Cooper ES; Ryden SE; Hill JR; Harrison CR
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1989 Sep; 113(9):969-74. PubMed ID: 2505734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Erythrocyte-magnetized technology: an original and innovative method for blood group serology.
    Bouix O; Ferrera V; Delamaire M; Redersdorff JC; Roubinet F
    Transfusion; 2008 Sep; 48(9):1878-85. PubMed ID: 18522706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Electronic crossmatching.
    Arslan O
    Transfus Med Rev; 2006 Jan; 20(1):75-9. PubMed ID: 16373190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The gel centrifugation test in serologic compatibility testing].
    Hitzler W; Bauernfeind U; Schömig-Brekner J; Mathias D
    Beitr Infusionsther; 1990; 26():358-61. PubMed ID: 1703871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Identification and evaluation of false-negative antibody screens.
    Powers A; Chandrashekar S; Mohammed M; Uhl L
    Transfusion; 2010 Mar; 50(3):617-21. PubMed ID: 19951323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Comprehensive Blood Bank Survey of the College of American Pathologists--1978.
    Walker RH; Mullen SA; Myhre BA; Polesky HF; van der Hoeven LH; van Schoonhoven PV
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1980 Oct; 74(4 Suppl):560-4. PubMed ID: 7435448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An experience of the introduction of a blood bank automation system (Ortho AutoVue Innova) in a regional acute hospital.
    Cheng YW; Wilkinson JM
    Transfus Apher Sci; 2015 Aug; 53(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 25863409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A quality improvement cycle: hemolyzed specimens in the emergency department.
    Pretlow L; Gandy T; Leibach EK; Russell B; Kraj B
    Clin Lab Sci; 2008; 21(4):219-24. PubMed ID: 19174982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A retrospective study of positive antibody screens at delivery in Rh-negative parturients.
    Cambic CR; Scavone BM; McCarthy RJ; Eisenberg P; Sanchez EM; Sullivan JT; Wong CA
    Can J Anaesth; 2010 Sep; 57(9):811-6. PubMed ID: 20661682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The results of the 1979 Comprehensive blood bank survey of the College of American Pathologists.
    Walker RH; Kuban DJ; Polesky HF; van der Hoeven LH
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1981 Oct; 76(4 Suppl):514-20. PubMed ID: 6792903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Guidelines for microplate techniques in liquid-phase blood grouping and antibody screening. A Joint Publication of the British Society for Haematology and the British Blood Transfusion Society. BCSH Blood Transfusion Task Force.
    Clin Lab Haematol; 1990; 12(4):437-60. PubMed ID: 2127909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of an automated microplate technique in the Galileo system for ABO and Rh(D) blood grouping.
    Xu W; Wan F; Lou Y; Jin J; Mao W
    Clin Lab; 2014; 60(2):241-4. PubMed ID: 24660536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Comprehensive Blood Bank Survey of the College of American Pathologists--1981.
    Walker RH; Kuban DJ; Polesky HF; van der Hoeven LH
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1983 Oct; 80(4 Suppl):585-89. PubMed ID: 6414288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 30.