These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

589 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18482191)

  • 21. North American pretransfusion testing practices, 2001-2004: results from the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program survey data, 2001-2004.
    Shulman IA; Maffei LM; Downes KA
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2005 Aug; 129(8):984-9. PubMed ID: 16048410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Type and screen policy: is there any compromise on blood safety?
    Agrawal A
    Transfus Apher Sci; 2014 Apr; 50(2):271-3. PubMed ID: 24472664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Adherence to a strict specimen-labeling policy decreases the incidence of erroneous blood grouping of blood bank specimens.
    Lumadue JA; Boyd JS; Ness PM
    Transfusion; 1997; 37(11-12):1169-72. PubMed ID: 9426641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A simple and reliable method to blood type monkeys using serum samples.
    Chen S; Wei Q; Li J; Xiang Y; Guo H; Ichim TE; Chen S; Chen G
    Transpl Int; 2009 Oct; 22(10):999-1004. PubMed ID: 19298252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of polyethylene terephthalate for ABO and Rh typing and alloantibody screening.
    Anderson DR; Wiseman J; MacLeod J; Burton E; Zayed E
    Transfusion; 2000 Jun; 40(6):669-72. PubMed ID: 10864986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Detection of weak D with a fully automated solid-phase red cell adherence system.
    Lai M; Mavilia G; d'Onofrio G; Leone G
    Transfusion; 2005 May; 45(5):689-93. PubMed ID: 15847655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Type and screen completion for scheduled surgical procedures. A College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 8941 type and screen tests in 108 institutions.
    Friedberg RC; Jones BA; Walsh MK;
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2003 May; 127(5):533-40. PubMed ID: 12708894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The blood bank "black box" debunked: pretransfusion testing explained.
    Yazer MH
    CMAJ; 2006 Jan; 174(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 16389232
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Enhanced detection of blood bank sample collection errors with a centralized patient database.
    MacIvor D; Triulzi DJ; Yazer MH
    Transfusion; 2009 Jan; 49(1):40-3. PubMed ID: 18798804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Blood ordering in obstetrics and gynecology: recommendations for the type and screen.
    Hill ST; Lavin JP
    Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Aug; 62(2):236-40. PubMed ID: 6408546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Thirty-day typing and screening for patients undergoing elective surgery: experience at a large cancer center.
    Narvios AB; Rozner M; Lichtiger B
    Transfusion; 2006 Mar; 46(3):348-51. PubMed ID: 16533275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Implementation of a two-specimen requirement for verification of ABO/Rh for blood transfusion.
    Goodnough LT; Viele M; Fontaine MJ; Jurado C; Stone N; Quach P; Chua L; Chin ML; Scott R; Tokareva I; Tabb K; Sharek PJ
    Transfusion; 2009 Jul; 49(7):1321-8. PubMed ID: 19389026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. New techniques for compatibility testing.
    Plapp FV
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1989 Mar; 113(3):262-9. PubMed ID: 2493236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The College of American Pathologists comprehensive blood bank survey program, 1973.
    Myhre BA; Koepke JA
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1975 Jun; 63(6 SUPPL):995-1001. PubMed ID: 807100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Toward extended phenotype matching: a new operational paradigm for the transfusion service.
    Klapper E; Zhang Y; Figueroa P; Ness P; Stubbs J; Abumuhor I; Bailey J; Epperson L; Tauscher C; Enriquez E; Hashmi G; Seul M
    Transfusion; 2010 Mar; 50(3):536-46. PubMed ID: 19929860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of the gel system for ABO grouping and D typing.
    Langston MM; Procter JL; Cipolone KM; Stroncek DF
    Transfusion; 1999 Mar; 39(3):300-5. PubMed ID: 10204594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. CAP comprehensive blood bank survey--1985.
    Cooper ES; Ryden SE; Schmidt PJ; Walker RH
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1987 Oct; 111(10):899-903. PubMed ID: 3115222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Revised guidelines for compatibility testing in hospital blood banks: important changes for quality assurance and procedures.
    Voak D; Waters AH
    Clin Lab Haematol; 1990; 12(2):235-6. PubMed ID: 2119933
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The 1986 Comprehensive Blood Bank Survey of the College of American Pathologists.
    Cooper ES; Polesky HF; Harrison CR; Schmidt PJ; Simon TL
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Sep; 112(9):878-82. PubMed ID: 3137910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of Erytra® fully automated analyser for Routine Use in Transfusion Laboratory.
    Chang C; Brown M; Davies L; Pointon L; Brown R; Barker D
    Transfus Med; 2014 Feb; 24(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 24188135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 30.