These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
556 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18482352)
1. Comparison of stress distribution between complete denture and implant-retained overdenture-2D FEA. Assunção WG; Tabata LF; Barão VA; Rocha EP J Oral Rehabil; 2008 Oct; 35(10):766-74. PubMed ID: 18482352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Finite element analysis to compare complete denture and implant-retained overdentures with different attachment systems. Barão VA; Assunção WG; Tabata LF; Delben JA; Gomes EA; de Sousa EA; Rocha EP J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 20(4):1066-71. PubMed ID: 19553853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison between complete denture and implant-retained overdenture: effect of different mucosa thickness and resiliency on stress distribution. Assunção WG; Barão VA; Tabata LF; de Sousa EA; Gomes EA; Delben JA Gerodontology; 2009 Dec; 26(4):273-81. PubMed ID: 19076244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of single-standing or connected implants on stress distribution in bone of mandibular overdentures: a two-dimensional finite element analysis. Tabata LF; Assunção WG; Barão VA; Gomes EA; Delben JA; de Sousa EA; Rocha EP J Craniofac Surg; 2010 May; 21(3):696-702. PubMed ID: 20485031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Photoelastic stress analysis of various retention mechanisms on 3-implant-retained mandibular overdentures. Celik G; Uludag B J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Apr; 97(4):229-35. PubMed ID: 17499093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In vitro study of a mandibular implant overdenture retained with ball, magnet, or bar attachments: comparison of load transfer and denture stability. Tokuhisa M; Matsushita Y; Koyano K Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):128-34. PubMed ID: 12737242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of different mucosa thickness and resiliency on stress distribution of implant-retained overdentures-2D FEA. Barão VA; Assunção WG; Tabata LF; de Sousa EA; Rocha EP Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2008 Nov; 92(2):213-23. PubMed ID: 18783845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of stress patterns produced by implant-retained overdentures and implant-retained fixed partial denture. Mazaro JV; Filho HG; Vedovatto E; Pellizzer EP; Rezende MC; Zavanelli AC J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 22(6):2153-7. PubMed ID: 22067869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Implant-retained mandibular bar-supported overlay dentures: a finite element stress analysis of four different bar heights. Rismanchian M; Dakhilalian M; Bajoghli F; Ghasemi E; Sadr-Eshkevari P J Oral Implantol; 2012 Apr; 38(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 20545552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bone strains around immediately loaded implants supporting mandibular overdentures in human cadavers. Akça K; Akkocaoglu M; Cömert A; Tekdemir I; Cehreli MC Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(1):101-9. PubMed ID: 17340903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mandibular implant-retained overdenture: finite element analysis of two anchorage systems. Menicucci G; Lorenzetti M; Pera P; Preti G Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(3):369-76. PubMed ID: 9638007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [A three-dimensional finite element stress analysis of implant-supported prosthesis and its supporting tissue in the edentulous mandible. Part 6. The influence of superstructure in mandibular complete implant overdenture and its supporting tissue]. He J; Cen Y; Mao X Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1997 Feb; 15(1):67-9. PubMed ID: 11480066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Photoelastic analysis of the distribution of stress in different systems of overdentures on osseous-integrated implants. Machado AC; Cardoso L; Brandt WC; Henriques GE; de Arruda Nóbilo MA J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 22(6):2332-6. PubMed ID: 22134270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Finite element analysis of stress-breaking attachments on maxillary implant-retained overdentures. Tanino F; Hayakawa I; Hirano S; Minakuchi S Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 17455444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A clinical trial of patient satisfaction and prosthodontic needs with ball and bar attachments for implant-retained complete overdentures: three-year results. MacEntee MI; Walton JN; Glick N J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jan; 93(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 15623995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of the number of supporting implants on mandibular photoelastic models with different implant-retained overdenture designs. Celik G; Uludag B J Prosthodont; 2014 Jul; 23(5):374-80. PubMed ID: 24417330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Photoelastic analysis of the effect of palatal support on various implant-supported overdenture designs. Ochiai KT; Williams BH; Hojo S; Nishimura R; Caputo AA J Prosthet Dent; 2004 May; 91(5):421-7. PubMed ID: 15153848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-retained overdentures and conventional dentures among middle-aged edentulous patients: satisfaction and functional assessment. Awad MA; Lund JP; Dufresne E; Feine JS Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 12737240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The influence of bar design (round versus milled bar) on prosthodontic maintenance of mandibular overdentures supported by 4 implants: a 5-year prospective study. Krennmair G; Krainhöfner M; Piehslinger E Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(6):514-20. PubMed ID: 19149069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Attachment systems for mandibular single-implant overdentures: an in vitro retention force investigation on different designs. Alsabeeha N; Atieh M; Swain MV; Payne AG Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(2):160-6. PubMed ID: 20305857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]