These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

556 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18482352)

  • 41. The service life of implant-retained overdenture attachment systems.
    Pigozzo MN; Mesquita MF; Henriques GE; Vaz LG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Aug; 102(2):74-80. PubMed ID: 19643220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Effect of dislodging forces on mandibular implant attachment-retained overdenture.
    Elkerdawy MW; Radi IA
    Implant Dent; 2011 Jun; 20(3):246-54. PubMed ID: 21613951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. [The three-dimensional analysis of mandibular overdenture supported by implants].
    Luo X; Ouyang G; Ma X; Jia A; Guo T
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 1998 Jun; 15(2):167-71. PubMed ID: 12548907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Influence of implant distribution on the biomechanical behaviors of mandibular implant-retained overdentures: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Liao X; Cao R; Zhong J; Chen C; Pan S
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Mar; 24(1):405. PubMed ID: 38555452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Mandibular implant-supported overdenture: an in vitro comparison of ball, bar, and magnetic attachments.
    Manju V; Sreelal T
    J Oral Implantol; 2013 Jun; 39(3):302-7. PubMed ID: 22891704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Prosthetic aspects and patient satisfaction with two-implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a 10-year randomized clinical study.
    Naert I; Alsaadi G; Quirynen M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(4):401-10. PubMed ID: 15382775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Three-dimensional finite element analysis and comparison of stress distribution in overdentures supported with bar attachments and telescopic crowns.
    Pan S; Yin Y; Feng H
    Chin J Dent Res; 1999 Feb; 2(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 10557179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The effects of two attachment types on the stresses introduced to the mandibular residual ridge: a 3D finite element analysis.
    Dashti MH; Atashrazm P; Emadi MI; Mishaeel S; Banava S
    Quintessence Int; 2013; 44(8):585-90. PubMed ID: 23757462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with a milled bar: a retrospective study.
    Krennmair G; Krainhöfner M; Piehslinger E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):987-94. PubMed ID: 18271381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Stress transfer of four mandibular implant overdenture cantilever designs.
    Sadowsky SJ; Caputo AA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Oct; 92(4):328-36. PubMed ID: 15507904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [A three-dimensional finite element stress analysis of implant-supported prosthesis and its supporting tissue in the edentulous mandible. Part 5. The influence of implant type in complete implant overdenture and its supporting tissue].
    Cen Y; Mao X; He J
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1997 Feb; 15(1):64-6. PubMed ID: 11480065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A randomized clinical trial comparing two mandibular implant overdenture designs: 3-year prosthetic outcomes using a six-field protocol.
    Walton JN
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(3):255-60. PubMed ID: 12854788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Stress analysis at bone-implant interface of single- and two-implant-retained mandibular overdenture using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Lahoti K; Pathrabe A; Gade J
    Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(6):597-601. PubMed ID: 28169256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [Three-dimensional finite element stress analysis of magnetical retaining and bar retaining in overdenture implants].
    Xu S; Cheng X; Hua X
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1997 Mar; 32(2):105-7. PubMed ID: 10677962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. In vivo force measurements on maxillary implants supporting a fixed prosthesis or an overdenture: a pilot study.
    Mericske-Stern R; Venetz E; Fahrländer F; Bürgin W
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Nov; 84(5):535-47. PubMed ID: 11105009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Maxillary interim overdentures retained by splinted or unsplinted provisional implants.
    Krennmair G; Fürhauser R; Weinländer M; Piehslinger E
    Int J Prosthodont; 2005; 18(3):195-200. PubMed ID: 15945304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Retention of maxillary implant overdenture bars of different designs.
    Williams BH; Ochiai KT; Hojo S; Nishimura R; Caputo AA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Dec; 86(6):603-7. PubMed ID: 11753311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Comparison of retention and stability of two implant-retained overdentures based on implant location.
    Scherer MD; McGlumphy EA; Seghi RR; Campagni WV
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):515-21. PubMed ID: 24819528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Biomechanical rationale for a single implant-retained mandibular overdenture: an in vitro study.
    Maeda Y; Horisaka M; Yagi K
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Mar; 19(3):271-5. PubMed ID: 18081872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Control of jaw closing forces: a comparison between implant-stabilised overdenture wearers and complete denture wearers.
    Leung T; Haag BM
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2000 Dec; 8(4):145-8. PubMed ID: 11692997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 28.