BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

537 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18482477)

  • 1. Estimating the pi* goodness of fit index for finite mixtures of item response models.
    Revuelta J
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 May; 61(Pt 1):93-113. PubMed ID: 18482477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Application of the pi* goodness-of-fit index to latent structure models].
    Revuelta J; Kessel D
    Psicothema; 2007 May; 19(2):322-8. PubMed ID: 17425905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Marginal likelihood inference for a model for item responses and response times.
    Glas CA; van der Linden WJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Nov; 63(Pt 3):603-26. PubMed ID: 20109271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The construction and implementation of user-defined fit tests for use with marginal maximum likelihood estimation and generalized item response models.
    Adams RJ; Wu ML
    J Appl Meas; 2009; 10(4):355-70. PubMed ID: 19934525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bayesian item fit analysis for unidimensional item response theory models.
    Sinharay S
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2006 Nov; 59(Pt 2):429-49. PubMed ID: 17067420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Type I errors and power of the parametric bootstrap goodness-of-fit test: full and limited information.
    Tollenaar N; Mooijaart A
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2003 Nov; 56(Pt 2):271-88. PubMed ID: 14633336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Limited-information goodness-of-fit testing of item response theory models for sparse 2 tables.
    Cai L; Maydeu-Olivares A; Coffman DL; Thissen D
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2006 May; 59(Pt 1):173-94. PubMed ID: 16709285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Heteroscedastic one-factor models and marginal maximum likelihood estimation.
    Hessen DJ; Dolan CV
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Feb; 62(Pt 1):57-77. PubMed ID: 17935662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bootstrapping the estimated latent distribution of the two-parameter latent trait model.
    Knott M; Tzamourani P
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2007 May; 60(Pt 1):175-91. PubMed ID: 17535586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Goodness-of-fit in generalized nonlinear mixed-effects models.
    Vonesh EF; Chinchilli VM; Pu K
    Biometrics; 1996 Jun; 52(2):572-87. PubMed ID: 10766504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimation of IRT graded response models: limited versus full information methods.
    Forero CG; Maydeu-Olivares A
    Psychol Methods; 2009 Sep; 14(3):275-99. PubMed ID: 19719362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A nonparametric smoothing method for assessing GEE models with longitudinal binary data.
    Lin KC; Chen YJ; Shyr Y
    Stat Med; 2008 Sep; 27(22):4428-39. PubMed ID: 18613210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rasch analysis of distractors in multiple-choice items.
    Wang WC
    J Outcome Meas; 1998; 2(1):43-65. PubMed ID: 9661731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mixture models for eye-tracking data: a case study.
    Pauler DK; Escobar MD; Sweeney JA; Greenhouse J
    Stat Med; 1996 Jul; 15(13):1365-76. PubMed ID: 8841647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A graded response model for measuring person reliability.
    Ferrando PJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Nov; 62(Pt 3):641-62. PubMed ID: 19159504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence analysis for the factor analysis model with ranking data.
    Xu L; Poon WY; Lee SY
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 May; 61(Pt 1):133-61. PubMed ID: 18482479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rasch fit statistics as a test of the invariance of item parameter estimates.
    Smith RM; Suh KK
    J Appl Meas; 2003; 4(2):153-63. PubMed ID: 12748407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Goodness-of-fit tests for GEE modeling with binary responses.
    Barnhart HX; Williamson JM
    Biometrics; 1998 Jun; 54(2):720-9. PubMed ID: 9629652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Goodness of fit in polytomous items: Type I error rates and empirical power for three fit-indexes].
    Sueiro MJ; Abad FJ
    Psicothema; 2009 Nov; 21(4):639-45. PubMed ID: 19861112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adjusted Rasch person-fit statistics.
    Dimitrov DM; Smith RM
    J Appl Meas; 2006; 7(2):170-83. PubMed ID: 16632900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.