These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18482478)

  • 1. Power of pairwise comparisons in the equal variance and unequal sample size case.
    Ramsey PH; Ramsey PP
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 May; 61(Pt 1):115-31. PubMed ID: 18482478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Power and Type I errors for pairwise comparisons of means in the unequal variances case.
    Ramsey PH; Ramsey PP
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 May; 62(Pt 2):263-81. PubMed ID: 18331666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using the Tukey-Kramer omnibus test in the Hayter-Fisher procedure.
    Richter SJ; McCann MH
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2012 Nov; 65(3):499-510. PubMed ID: 22335527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optimum sample size allocation to minimize cost or maximize power for the two-sample trimmed mean test.
    Guo JH; Luh WM
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 May; 62(Pt 2):283-98. PubMed ID: 18157920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of closed testing procedures for pairwise testing of means.
    Ramsey PH
    Psychol Methods; 2002 Dec; 7(4):504-23. PubMed ID: 12530706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A general approach for sample size and statistical power calculations assessing of interventions using a mixture model in the presence of detection limits.
    Nie L; Chu H; Cole SR
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2006 Oct; 27(5):483-91. PubMed ID: 16769254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sample size determination in step-up testing procedures for multiple comparisons with a control.
    Kwong KS; Cheung SH; Wen MJ
    Stat Med; 2010 Nov; 29(26):2743-56. PubMed ID: 20799258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Power evaluation of various modified Bonferroni procedures by a Monte Carlo study.
    Morikawa T; Terao A; Iwasaki M
    J Biopharm Stat; 1996 Jul; 6(3):343-59. PubMed ID: 8854237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A simple procedure to compute the sample size needed to compare two independent groups when the population variances are unequal.
    Singer J
    Stat Med; 2001 Apr; 20(7):1089-95. PubMed ID: 11276038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tests for inter-subject and total variabilities under crossover designs.
    Lee Y; Shao J; Chow SC; Wang H
    J Biopharm Stat; 2002 Nov; 12(4):503-34. PubMed ID: 12477072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Application of false discovery rate procedure to pairwise comparisons of refractive index of glass fragments.
    Pawluk-Kołc M; Zieba-Palus J; Parczewski A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2006 Jun; 160(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 16221535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Test equality and sample size calculation based on risk difference in a randomized clinical trial with noncompliance and missing outcomes.
    Lui KJ; Chang KC
    Biom J; 2008 Apr; 50(2):224-36. PubMed ID: 18264992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A note on the power of Fisher's least significant difference procedure.
    Meier U
    Pharm Stat; 2006; 5(4):253-63. PubMed ID: 17128424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sample size and statistical power assessing the effect of interventions in the context of mixture distributions with detection limits.
    Chu H; Nie L; Cole SR
    Stat Med; 2006 Aug; 25(15):2647-57. PubMed ID: 16456897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Power and sample size calculations for discrete bounded outcome scores.
    Tsonaka R; Rizopoulos D; Lesaffre E
    Stat Med; 2006 Dec; 25(24):4241-52. PubMed ID: 16947202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Testing the ratio of two poisson rates.
    Gu K; Ng HK; Tang ML; Schucany WR
    Biom J; 2008 Apr; 50(2):283-98. PubMed ID: 18311854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sample size determination for assessing equivalence based on proportion ratio under a randomized trial with non-compliance and missing outcomes.
    Lui KJ; Chang KC
    Stat Med; 2008 Jan; 27(1):47-67. PubMed ID: 17708514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Group sequential t-test for clinical trials with small sample sizes across stages.
    Shao J; Feng H
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2007 Sep; 28(5):563-71. PubMed ID: 17434814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An improved uniformly more powerful exact Fisher-Hayter pairwise comparisons procedure.
    Wang B; Cui X
    Biom J; 2017 Jul; 59(4):767-775. PubMed ID: 28436123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sample size determination for logistic regression revisited.
    Demidenko E
    Stat Med; 2007 Aug; 26(18):3385-97. PubMed ID: 17149799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.