These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18482517)

  • 1. Fluorescence changes in remineralized and nonremineralized enamel adjacent to glass ionomer ART restorations: an in vitro study.
    Gaskin EB; Harless JD; Wefel JS; Guzmán-Armstrong S; Armstrong SR; Vargas MA; Hernández MM; Qian F
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2007; 74(3):215-20. PubMed ID: 18482517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prevention of demineralization around orthodontic brackets in vitro.
    Sudjalim TR; Woods MG; Manton DJ; Reynolds EC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jun; 131(6):705.e1-9. PubMed ID: 17561043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Enamel remineralization on teeth adjacent to Class II glass ionomer restorations.
    Segura A; Donly KJ; Stratmann RG
    Am J Dent; 1997 Oct; 10(5):247-50. PubMed ID: 9522700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The in vitro effect of glass-ionomer cement restoration on enamel subjected to a demineralization and remineralization model.
    Serra MC; Cury JA
    Quintessence Int; 1992 Feb; 23(2):143-7. PubMed ID: 1641453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mineral loss on adjacent enamel glass ionomer cements restorations after cariogenic and erosive challenges.
    Salas CF; Guglielmi CA; Raggio DP; Mendes FM
    Arch Oral Biol; 2011 Oct; 56(10):1014-9. PubMed ID: 21489401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In situ effects of restorative materials on dental biofilm and enamel demineralisation.
    Sousa RP; Zanin IC; Lima JP; Vasconcelos SM; Melo MA; Beltrão HC; Rodrigues LK
    J Dent; 2009 Jan; 37(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 19026481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Demineralization inhibition of direct tooth-colored restorative materials.
    Gonzalez Ede H; Yap AU; Hsu SC
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(5):578-85. PubMed ID: 15470881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Enamel demineralization and remineralization under plaque fluid-like conditions: a quantitative light-induced fluorescence study.
    Lippert F; Butler A; Lynch RJ
    Caries Res; 2011; 45(2):155-61. PubMed ID: 21454979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In vitro evaluation of secondary caries development in enamel and root dentin around luted metallic restoration.
    Shinkai RS; Cury AA; Cury JA
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 11203778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Enamel de/remineralization on teeth adjacent to fluoride releasing materials without dentifrice exposure.
    Bynum AM; Donly KJ
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1999; 66(2):89-92, 84. PubMed ID: 10431616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of fluorides from various restorative materials on remineralization of adjacent tooth: an in vitro study.
    Baliga MS; Bhat SS
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2010; 28(2):84-90. PubMed ID: 20660973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An in vitro comparison of three fluoride regimens on enamel remineralization.
    Marinelli CB; Donly KJ; Wefel JS; Jakobsen JR; Denehy GE
    Caries Res; 1997; 31(6):418-22. PubMed ID: 9353580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of laser fluorescence in the monitoring of the initial stage of the de-/remineralization process: an in vitro and in situ study.
    Spiguel MH; Tovo MF; Kramer PF; Franco KS; Alves KM; Delbem AC
    Caries Res; 2009; 43(4):302-7. PubMed ID: 19439952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inhibition of demineralization in vitro around amalgam restorations.
    Pimenta LA; Fontana UF; Cury JA; Serra MC; Elderton RJ
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Jun; 29(6):363-7. PubMed ID: 9728147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vitro enamel effects of a resin-modified glass ionomer: fluoride uptake and resistance to demineralization.
    Wandera A
    Pediatr Dent; 1998; 20(7):411-7. PubMed ID: 9866145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vitro evaluation of the cariostatic action of esthetic restorative materials in bovine teeth under severe cariogenic challenge.
    Pin ML; Abdo RC; Machado MA; da Silva SM; Pavarini A; Marta SN
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(3):368-75. PubMed ID: 15986958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fluoride release and cariostatic potential of orthodontic adhesives with and without daily fluoride rinsing.
    Chin MY; Sandham A; Rumachik EN; Ruben JL; Huysmans MC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Oct; 136(4):547-53. PubMed ID: 19815157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Early detection of secondary caries using quantitative, light-induced fluorescence.
    González-Cabezas C; Fontana M; Gomes-Moosbauer D; Stookey GK
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(4):415-22. PubMed ID: 12877427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. VariGlass fluoride release and uptake by an adjacent tooth.
    Modesto A; Chevitarese O; Cury JA; Vieira AR
    Am J Dent; 1997 Jun; 10(3):123-7. PubMed ID: 9545886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vitro enamel caries formation and orthodontic bonding agents.
    Cain K; Hicks J; English J; Flaitz C; Powers JM; Rives T
    Am J Dent; 2006 Jun; 19(3):187-92. PubMed ID: 16838485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.