These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
795 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18484589)
1. Percentage of high-grade carcinoma as a prognostic indicator in patients with renal cell carcinoma. Serrano MF; Katz M; Yan Y; Kibel AS; Humphrey PA Cancer; 2008 Aug; 113(3):477-83. PubMed ID: 18484589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Original and reviewed nuclear grading according to the Fuhrman system: a multivariate analysis of 388 patients with conventional renal cell carcinoma. Ficarra V; Martignoni G; Maffei N; Brunelli M; Novara G; Zanolla L; Pea M; Artibani W Cancer; 2005 Jan; 103(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 15573369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multicenter determination of optimal interobserver agreement using the Fuhrman grading system for renal cell carcinoma: Assessment of 241 patients with > 15-year follow-up. Lang H; Lindner V; de Fromont M; Molinié V; Letourneux H; Meyer N; Martin M; Jacqmin D Cancer; 2005 Feb; 103(3):625-9. PubMed ID: 15611969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Pathological prognostic indicators in renal cell carcinoma]. Rey Rey J; León Ramírez D; López García S; Fernández Vázquez P; Benavente Delgado J; Ojea Calvo A Actas Urol Esp; 2010 Jan; 34(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 20223135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prognostic value of renal vein and inferior vena cava involvement in renal cell carcinoma. Wagner B; Patard JJ; Méjean A; Bensalah K; Verhoest G; Zigeuner R; Ficarra V; Tostain J; Mulders P; Chautard D; Descotes JL; de la Taille A; Salomon L; Prayer-Galetti T; Cindolo L; Valéri A; Meyer N; Jacqmin D; Lang H Eur Urol; 2009 Feb; 55(2):452-9. PubMed ID: 18692951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prognostic significance of perinephric fat infiltration and tumor size in renal cell carcinoma. Yoo C; Song C; Hong JH; Kim CS; Ahn H J Urol; 2008 Aug; 180(2):486-91; discussion 491. PubMed ID: 18550101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Microvascular tumor invasion, tumor size and Fuhrman grade: a pathological triad for prognostic evaluation of renal cell carcinoma. Dall'Oglio MF; Ribeiro-Filho LA; Antunes AA; Crippa A; Nesrallah L; Gonçalves PD; Leite KR; Srougi M J Urol; 2007 Aug; 178(2):425-8; discussion 428. PubMed ID: 17561167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fuhrman grading is not appropriate for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma. Delahunt B; Sika-Paotonu D; Bethwaite PB; McCredie MR; Martignoni G; Eble JN; Jordan TW Am J Surg Pathol; 2007 Jun; 31(6):957-60. PubMed ID: 17527087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Histological subtyping and nuclear grading of renal cell carcinoma and their implications for survival: a retrospective nation-wide study of 629 patients. Gudbjartsson T; Hardarson S; Petursdottir V; Thoroddsen A; Magnusson J; Einarsson GV Eur Urol; 2005 Oct; 48(4):593-600. PubMed ID: 15964127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prognostic value of histologic subtypes in renal cell carcinoma: a multicenter experience. Patard JJ; Leray E; Rioux-Leclercq N; Cindolo L; Ficarra V; Zisman A; De La Taille A; Tostain J; Artibani W; Abbou CC; Lobel B; Guillé F; Chopin DK; Mulders PF; Wood CG; Swanson DA; Figlin RA; Belldegrun AS; Pantuck AJ J Clin Oncol; 2005 Apr; 23(12):2763-71. PubMed ID: 15837991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. External validation of the Mayo Clinic cancer specific survival score in a Japanese series of clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Fujii Y; Saito K; Iimura Y; Sakai Y; Koga F; Kawakami S; Kumagai J; Kihara K J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1290-5; discussion 1295-6. PubMed ID: 18707704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Grading of clear cell renal cell carcinoma should be based on nucleolar prominence. Delahunt B; Sika-Paotonu D; Bethwaite PB; William Jordan T; Magi-Galluzzi C; Zhou M; Samaratunga H; Srigley JR Am J Surg Pathol; 2011 Aug; 35(8):1134-9. PubMed ID: 21716085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Collecting system invasion and Fuhrman grade but not tumor size facilitate prognostic stratification of patients with pT2 renal cell carcinoma. Brookman-May S; May M; Zigeuner R; Shariat SF; Scherr DS; Chromecki T; Moch H; Wild PJ; Mohamad-Al-Ali B; Cindolo L; Wieland WF; Schips L; De Cobelli O; Rocco B; Santoro L; De Nunzio C; Tubaro A; Coman I; Feciche B; Truss M; Dalpiaz O; Hohenfellner M; Gilfrich C; Wirth MP; Burger M; Pahernik S; J Urol; 2011 Dec; 186(6):2175-81. PubMed ID: 22014800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prognostic significance of clinicopathologic and deoxyribonucleic acid flow cytometric variables in non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the modern era. Clark PE; Veys JA; Eskridge MR; Woodruff RD; Hall MC Urol Oncol; 2005; 23(5):328-32. PubMed ID: 16144666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multi-institutional validation of a symptom based classification for renal cell carcinoma. Patard JJ; Leray E; Cindolo L; Ficarra V; Rodriguez A; De La Taille A; Tostain J; Artibani W; Abbou CC; Guillé F; Chopin DK; Lobel B J Urol; 2004 Sep; 172(3):858-62. PubMed ID: 15310983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A novel tumor grading scheme for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: prognostic utility and comparison with Fuhrman nuclear grade. Paner GP; Amin MB; Alvarado-Cabrero I; Young AN; Stricker HJ; Moch H; Lyles RH Am J Surg Pathol; 2010 Sep; 34(9):1233-40. PubMed ID: 20679882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Nucleolar grade but not Fuhrman grade is applicable to papillary renal cell carcinoma. Sika-Paotonu D; Bethwaite PB; McCredie MR; William Jordan T; Delahunt B Am J Surg Pathol; 2006 Sep; 30(9):1091-6. PubMed ID: 16931953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Long-term outcomes after nephron sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma larger than 4 cm. Peycelon M; Hupertan V; Comperat E; Renard-Penna R; Vaessen C; Conort P; Bitker MO; Chartier-Kastler E; Richard F; Rouprêt M J Urol; 2009 Jan; 181(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 19012929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]