These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18484824)

  • 1. ERP evidence that surface-based attention biases interocular competition during rivalry.
    Khoe W; Mitchell JF; Reynolds JH; Hillyard SA
    J Vis; 2008 Mar; 8(3):18.1-11. PubMed ID: 18484824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Exogenous attentional selection of transparent superimposed surfaces modulates early event-related potentials.
    Khoe W; Mitchell JF; Reynolds JH; Hillyard SA
    Vision Res; 2005 Nov; 45(24):3004-14. PubMed ID: 16153678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Endogenous attention selection during binocular rivalry at early stages of visual processing.
    Mishra J; Hillyard SA
    Vision Res; 2009 Jun; 49(10):1073-80. PubMed ID: 18384833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nonlinear SSVEP responses are sensitive to the perceptual binding of visual hemifields during conventional 'eye' rivalry and interocular 'percept' rivalry.
    Sutoyo D; Srinivasan R
    Brain Res; 2009 Jan; 1251():245-55. PubMed ID: 18952069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interocular rivalry revealed in the human cortical blind-spot representation.
    Tong F; Engel SA
    Nature; 2001 May; 411(6834):195-9. PubMed ID: 11346796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development of rivalry and dichoptic masking in human infants.
    Brown RJ; Candy TR; Norcia AM
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1999 Dec; 40(13):3324-33. PubMed ID: 10586959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Object-based attention determines dominance in binocular rivalry.
    Mitchell JF; Stoner GR; Reynolds JH
    Nature; 2004 May; 429(6990):410-3. PubMed ID: 15164062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Inter-ocular transfer of stimulus cueing in dominance selection at the onset of binocular rivalry.
    Kamphuisen AP; van Wezel RJ; van Ee R
    Vision Res; 2007 Apr; 47(9):1142-4. PubMed ID: 17360017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Role of primary visual cortex in the binocular integration of plaid motion perception.
    Saint-Amour D; Walsh V; Guillemot JP; Lassonde M; Lepore F
    Eur J Neurosci; 2005 Feb; 21(4):1107-15. PubMed ID: 15787716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Temporal frequency and contrast tagging bias the type of competition in interocular switch rivalry.
    Silver MA; Logothetis NK
    Vision Res; 2007 Feb; 47(4):532-43. PubMed ID: 17182075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interacting competitive selection in attention and binocular rivalry.
    Stoner GR; Mitchell JF; Fallah M; Reynolds JH
    Prog Brain Res; 2005; 149():227-34. PubMed ID: 16226587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Different time courses of Stroop and Garner effects in perception--an event-related potentials study.
    Boenke LT; Ohl FW; Nikolaev AR; Lachmann T; Leeuwen Cv
    Neuroimage; 2009 May; 45(4):1272-88. PubMed ID: 19349240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How does binocular rivalry emerge from cortical mechanisms of 3-D vision?
    Grossberg S; Yazdanbakhsh A; Cao Y; Swaminathan G
    Vision Res; 2008 Sep; 48(21):2232-50. PubMed ID: 18640145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Binocular rivalry is partly resolved at early processing stages with steady and with flickering presentation: a human event-related brain potential study.
    Roeber U; Schröger E
    Neurosci Lett; 2004 Nov; 371(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 15500965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Early correlates of visual awareness following orientation and colour rivalry.
    Veser S; O'Shea RP; Schröger E; Trujillo-Barreto NJ; Roeber U
    Vision Res; 2008 Oct; 48(22):2359-69. PubMed ID: 18727933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A binocular rivalry study of motion perception in the human brain.
    Moutoussis K; Keliris G; Kourtzi Z; Logothetis N
    Vision Res; 2005 Aug; 45(17):2231-43. PubMed ID: 15924938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Neural activity associated with attention orienting triggered by gaze cues: A study of lateralized ERPs.
    Holmes A; Mogg K; Garcia LM; Bradley BP
    Soc Neurosci; 2010; 5(3):285-95. PubMed ID: 20162493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of attention on the VEP in binocular and monocular conditions.
    Heravian-Shandiz J; Douthwaite WA; Jenkins TC
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1992 Oct; 12(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 1293531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Monocular rivalry exhibits three hallmarks of binocular rivalry: evidence for common processes.
    O'Shea RP; Parker A; La Rooy D; Alais D
    Vision Res; 2009 Mar; 49(7):671-81. PubMed ID: 19232529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Exogenous attention and endogenous attention influence initial dominance in binocular rivalry.
    Chong SC; Blake R
    Vision Res; 2006 May; 46(11):1794-803. PubMed ID: 16368126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.