202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18485493)
1. The development of Cantonese Lexical Neighborhood Test: a pilot study.
Yuen KC; Ng IH; Luk BP; Chan SK; Chan SC; Kwok IC; Yu HC; Chan TM; Hung TC; Tong MC
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Jul; 72(7):1121-9. PubMed ID: 18485493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Lexical effects on spoken word recognition performance among Mandarin-speaking children with normal hearing and cochlear implants.
Wang NM; Wu CM; Kirk KI
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2010 Aug; 74(8):883-90. PubMed ID: 20846499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Standard-Chinese Lexical Neighborhood Test in normal-hearing young children.
Liu C; Liu S; Zhang N; Yang Y; Kong Y; Zhang L
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2011 Jun; 75(6):774-81. PubMed ID: 21458862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of lexical characteristics and demographic factors on mandarin chinese open-set word recognition in children with cochlear implants.
Liu H; Liu S; Wang S; Liu C; Kong Y; Zhang N; Li S; Yang Y; Han D; Zhang L
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(2):221-8. PubMed ID: 23086423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
Davidson LS
Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Communication abilities of children with aided residual hearing: comparison with cochlear implant users.
Eisenberg LS; Kirk KI; Martinez AS; Ying EA; Miyamoto RT
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 May; 130(5):563-9. PubMed ID: 15148177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Speech and language development in a population of Swedish hearing-impaired pre-school children, a cross-sectional study.
Borg E; Edquist G; Reinholdson AC; Risberg A; McAllister B
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Jul; 71(7):1061-77. PubMed ID: 17512613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ten-year follow-up of a consecutive series of children with multichannel cochlear implants.
Uziel AS; Sillon M; Vieu A; Artieres F; Piron JP; Daures JP; Mondain M
Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):615-28. PubMed ID: 17667770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Speech recognition and language development in prelingually deafened children with multichannel cochlear prosthesis].
Cao K; Wei C; Wang Z; Jiao Z; Li Y
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2000 Feb; 35(1):16-9. PubMed ID: 12768681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Lexical tone perception ability of profoundly hearing-impaired children: performance of cochlear implant and hearing aid users.
Lee KY; van Hasselt CA; Tong MC
Otol Neurotol; 2010 Sep; 31(7):1079-87. PubMed ID: 20634774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Recognition of lexically controlled words and sentences by children with normal hearing and children with cochlear implants.
Eisenberg LS; Martinez AS; Holowecky SR; Pogorelsky S
Ear Hear; 2002 Oct; 23(5):450-62. PubMed ID: 12411778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Speech perception in children with cochlear implants: effects of lexical difficulty, talker variability, and word length.
Kirk KI; Hay-McCutcheon M; Sehgal ST; Miyamoto RT
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 2000 Dec; 185():79-81. PubMed ID: 11141016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Early language development in children with profound hearing loss fitted with a device at a young age: part II--content of the first lexicon.
Nott P; Cowan R; Brown PM; Wigglesworth G
Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):541-51. PubMed ID: 19581807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Speech recognition materials and ceiling effects: considerations for cochlear implant programs.
Gifford RH; Shallop JK; Peterson AM
Audiol Neurootol; 2008; 13(3):193-205. PubMed ID: 18212519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Perception of suprasegmental features of speech by children with cochlear implants and children with hearing AIDS.
Most T; Peled M
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2007; 12(3):350-61. PubMed ID: 17478417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Lexical effects on spoken word recognition by pediatric cochlear implant users.
Kirk KI; Pisoni DB; Osberger MJ
Ear Hear; 1995 Oct; 16(5):470-81. PubMed ID: 8654902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Phonological mismatch makes aided speech recognition in noise cognitively taxing.
Rudner M; Foo C; Rönnberg J; Lunner T
Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):879-92. PubMed ID: 17982373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Separating contributions of hearing, lexical knowledge, and speech production to speech-perception scores in children with hearing impairments.
Paatsch LE; Blamey PJ; Sarant JZ; Martin LF; Bow CP
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Aug; 47(4):738-50. PubMed ID: 15324283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cochlear implantation outcome in prelingually deafened young adults. A speech perception study.
Santarelli R; De Filippi R; Genovese E; Arslan E
Audiol Neurootol; 2008; 13(4):257-65. PubMed ID: 18259078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Music perception of cochlear implant users compared with that of hearing aid users.
Looi V; McDermott H; McKay C; Hickson L
Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):421-34. PubMed ID: 18344870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
